Originally posted by shockimebones
i personally think the meaning of our existence is to create the perfect being. We have been evolving for millions of years. We are meant to keep evolving until the perfect being is created. But what that being is needed for, I do not know.
adiosJim
That's exactly what my boyfriend thinks shock
Originally posted by Barakus
i do not intend to disrupt harmony in this thread.. i would just like to ask (innocently) why it is that you have a thirst to obtain the knowledge of the meaning of life. Can you not just accept the great gift that you have recieved and live each day to the fullest?
My brother, my baby brother. You sound just like me cry
I think the above idea is much more realistic than a lot of BS that the conspiracy theorists of the world come up with. It's almost outlandish enough that it makes more sense everytime you think about it.
If you really wanted to, you could probably convince a lesser mind, or most minds, that it was realistic.
-AC
Life needs no meaning
Yup, why do philosophers seek the meaning of life when there's enough stimulation in merely observing daily life? The finding of official meaning of life, will simply cast all of life into a simple reason for existence, which will just create a fight over the actual meaningfulness of the very reason.
I don't think life needs any meaning - it is enough of a presence without a superimposed meaning.
What do you think?
IMO, meaning is unavoidable. To say, "There is No Meaning to life," is still a conclusion by which one can bring meaning into one's existence. This aside, even if there is an overriding "Meaning of Life" in the traditional sense, this still doesn't mean everyone marches to the same drummer. Life/Reality/Existence is an infinite story in which we all play our parts.
However, if I were to try and pin down some kinda definite Meaning to it all, I would start from the observation that the Universe appears to have--despite entropy-- a strong tendency toward self-organization into higher and higher-level wholes. An evolutionary directive? Perhaps.