Do guns in the home make us safer?

Started by Ushgarak11 pages

Not that I can see that this is remotely philisophical...

But the whole idea of gun responsibility is a massive red herring. I am fully trained and cleared to operate army-grade weaponry (though point of trivia, due to an outstanding medical declaration from the Royal Army Medical Corps, I cannot fire them unsupervised...) but I don't think that kind of thing makes any difference to the situation at all.

First of all, you cannot compare guns and cars. Like them or not, modern society would cease to function without cars. Guns are a luxury item. Luxuries are far more prone to be legislated out if they are causing trouble.

Secondly, it does not matter how much the problem is lack of good gun education. The fact is simply that the high supply of guns in the US is a drect contributing factor to its enormous gun death rate. Decades of trying to educate people has had no discernible effect. People are dying, and in the US, the rate at which they are dying is ridiculous compared to the rest of the world. There is no damn time to try and get education working. Legislation to stop this death rate is the only sane solution at this point- and I am sorry for those who want to own guns, but like I say, people are dying and it is not worth it. And yess, 99% of those affected by such legislation would not be remotely criminal people but it if improves the gun death situation- and it will- that is a necessary sacrifice.

Thirdly, blaming it all on cultural problems with youth in certain cities is a distraction. The US gun death rate problem is spread all over US society. That the gun death rate amongst the criminal elemet is very high is not remarkable, because it is also very high everywhere ELSE. Obviously, that is just more discernable in criminal observation.

Originally posted by Cyclops
EXACTLY!

Too many people have this frame of mind:

"Who can we rely on to save our families? The police? When it comes time for my family's well-being, I would prefer to have a gun."

That just make things worse!

I don't think Cops care about other people's families. The only reason they protect is because they are getting pay to do it! Many times cops just don't bother to show up to scene right after a report has been filed. Some cops are even racist! Do you think a dept. like the LAPD are dedicated cops? HELL NO! So many crimes happen because thugs know the police will show up late! The days of the good cop serving the community are long gone! All we got left are a bunch of RACIST PIGS! That only want to harrass minorities!

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Not that I can see that this is remotely philisophical...

But the whole idea of gun responsibility is a massive red herring. I am fully trained and cleared to operate army-grade weaponry (though point of trivia, due to an outstanding medical declaration from the Royal Army Medical Corps, I cannot fire them unsupervised...) but I don't think that kind of thing makes any difference to the situation at all.

First of all, you cannot compare guns and cars. Like them or not, modern society would cease to function without cars. Guns are a luxury item. Luxuries are far more prone to be legislated out if they are causing trouble.

Secondly, it does not matter how much the problem is lack of good gun education. The fact is simply that the high supply of guns in the US is a drect contributing factor to its enormous gun death rate. Decades of trying to educate people has had no discernible effect. People are dying, and in the US, the rate at which they are dying is ridiculous compared to the rest of the world. There is no damn time to try and get education working. Legislation to stop this death rate is the only sane solution at this point- and I am sorry for those who want to own guns, but like I say, people are dying and it is not worth it. And yess, 99% of those affected by such legislation would not be remotely criminal people but it if improves the gun death situation- and it will- that is a necessary sacrifice.

Thirdly, blaming it all on cultural problems with youth in certain cities is a distraction. The US gun death rate problem is spread all over US society. That the gun death rate amongst the criminal elemet is very high is not remarkable, because it is also very high everywhere ELSE. Obviously, that is just more discernable in criminal observation.

I'm quoting this coz I don't think it should go unnoticed. I absolutely love it when Mike gets his knickers in a twist, gets me all excited 😗

😂 nickers is such a funny word....

Oooh, I excite Syren...

😮

You know you do, you naughty boy!

Milla? Knickers? How about Pants?

Nah, nickers is so funny....nickers. hah!

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Yeah, lovely, give everyone a gun, let everyone kill each other. On the other hand, why the hell do we need police and law at all, we can all own a gun and that would be the end of everyone troubles.
What a wonderful idea!

What point are you proving with this statement?

We're talking about owning a gun in the peacful confines of a household. Not walking down the street shooting people at will.

Why did they have police or a sheriff back in the western days if everyone was aloud to carry a gun on their person? Because the police can only do so much to protect you. Their job is to do their best to protect the innocent, but their primary job is to uphold the law. And the law states that you have a right to protect YOURSELF against unwanted and unlawful trespassers.

I got a wonderful idea. Lets create technology that will enable Police to stop someone from commiting a crime before it happens. Then we won't need guns to protect ourselves. Oh wait, that didn't work in Minority Report and it won't work in real life.

Guns are allowed in the home for a 2 reasons.

1. To hold guns that you would use for things like hunting or target practice.
2, To protect yourself.

I can't really think of another reason....oh, execpt if you use it to change the channel. 😄

''We're talking about owning a gun in the peacful confines of a household.''

That statement is so ridiculous! You are buying a gun in an intention to hurt someone! Thats what guns are for, they help people kill other people!

Not the whole USA is you Link.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Not that I can see that this is remotely philisophical...

But the whole idea of gun responsibility is a massive red herring. I am fully trained and cleared to operate army-grade weaponry (though point of trivia, due to an outstanding medical declaration from the Royal Army Medical Corps, I cannot fire them unsupervised...) but I don't think that kind of thing makes any difference to the situation at all.

First of all, you cannot compare guns and cars. Like them or not, modern society would cease to function without cars. Guns are a luxury item. Luxuries are far more prone to be legislated out if they are causing trouble.

Secondly, it does not matter how much the problem is lack of good gun education. The fact is simply that the high supply of guns in the US is a drect contributing factor to its enormous gun death rate. Decades of trying to educate people has had no discernible effect. People are dying, and in the US, the rate at which they are dying is ridiculous compared to the rest of the world. There is no damn time to try and get education working. Legislation to stop this death rate is the only sane solution at this point- and I am sorry for those who want to own guns, but like I say, people are dying and it is not worth it. And yess, 99% of those affected by such legislation would not be remotely criminal people but it if improves the gun death situation- and it will- that is a necessary sacrifice.

Thirdly, blaming it all on cultural problems with youth in certain cities is a distraction. The US gun death rate problem is spread all over US society. That the gun death rate amongst the criminal elemet is very high is not remarkable, because it is also very high everywhere ELSE. Obviously, that is just more discernable in criminal observation.

When i used guns and cars as a comparison i was using them as an example of how easy it is for a child to obtain possession of a lethal object. Don't down play the fact that more un-licensed, underage kids die from "joy riding" each year than little children shooting themselves.

As for "proper gun education" well I don't recall the US requiring more than your legal age consent and a 2 week waiting period. There are no classes or courses required to own a gun in the US.

In which case. These "vast" numbers of deaths caused by gun violence in the US are not a result of children finding their daddy's gun under his bed. Those cases are few and far between. Gun violence in the US stems from uneducated, socially outcast, misunderstood teens that chose the road of a criminal instead of a "normal" member of society.

The city with the most gun deaths in the United States, probably, also has the most gun related Police fatalities. In which case, I'm almost willing to guarantee that the majority of gun related fatalities in the United States are from unregistered guns.

Our gun control problem doesn't start in the home....it starts on the streets. Guns are just as easy to get as cocaine, speed, or E if you know who to talk to. And those are unregistered weapons that the cops are incapable of keeping under control.

If someone wants a gun...making it illegal isn't going to change a damn thing.

Often times its much easier for inner city youths to obtain a firearm through a friend of a friend than it is to sneak into daddy's room, find the key to his gun case, and then take it out of there. ANY responsible father would put belt to ass on a kid for fiddling with a gun without permission or supervision. Sorry if you're against physical punishment...but a quick foot to the ass often works better than "go to your room."

clap

You get me so hot when you talk intelligently baby, much more so than when you make statements about a world made of cheese 😗

Originally posted by Linkalicious
The city with the most gun deaths in the United States, probably, also has the most gun related Police fatalities. In which case, I'm almost willing to guarantee that the majority of gun related fatalities in the United States are from unregistered guns.

At the risk of sounding like Chris Rock.. we do not need gun control, we need ammo control. Guns dont kill people, bullets do.

Originally posted by Linkalicious
If someone wants a gun...making it illegal isn't going to change a damn thing.

Half the reason most drugs are as popular as they are is because they are illegal. Legalizing marijuana would probably lower the amount used. Part of the buzz is the risk of getting caught.

Originally posted by Linkalicious
Sorry if you're against physical punishment...but a quick foot to the ass often works better than "go to your room."

The youth of today have more freedom and less respect then ever! Parents rely on a third party to raise their children.

i got 2 guns. i have a permit for them both.

reason why i have them is because where i live man we got more homacide than nyc.

we never know what can happen next.

In the town of Kennesaw, Georgia, every family is required to have a gun in their household. They have one of the lowest crime rates in Metro Atlanta.

The right to bear arms clause was not only intended for protection from others but from our government... we were a rebel cause and we made sure that if this one turned into tyranny we would be ready and able to fight back... imagine if the British had tried to ban muskets...(Logically impossible but imagine anyways.) Today if the government went hay wire we would be completely defenseless against national troops, let alone federal troops.

once again, thank you for you're opinions. Now, it's time for the debate in my class

I own several guns, have one next to my bed, and carry one in my car. I take it with me when I go hiking and camping.

I have several years of training and a concealed weapons permit. My feeling on this is, it's better to have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun and not have it!

Originally posted by Linkalicious
What point are you proving with this statement?

We're talking about owning a gun in the peacful confines of a household. Not walking down the street shooting people at will.

Why did they have police or a sheriff back in the western days if everyone was aloud to carry a gun on their person? Because the police can only do so much to protect you. Their job is to do their best to protect the innocent, but their primary job is to uphold the law. And the law states that you have a right to protect YOURSELF against unwanted and unlawful trespassers.

I got a wonderful idea. Lets create technology that will enable Police to stop someone from commiting a crime before it happens. Then we won't need guns to protect ourselves. Oh wait, that didn't work in Minority Report and it won't work in real life.

Guns are allowed in the home for a 2 reasons.

1. To hold guns that you would use for things like hunting or target practice.
2, To protect yourself.

I can't really think of another reason....oh, execpt if you use it to change the channel. 😄

I admit, my family owns a few guns. However, my sister and I knew from a pretty young age basic gun safety stuff... Don't ever point it at anybody, even if it's not loaded, whenever you pick it up, check to see if it IS loaded, etc. And until we were 11 or 12, the room where my dad keeps them was always locked up. We don't have guns with the intention of protecting ourselves, they probably wouldn't do much good because we'd have to go all the way out to the garage, load one, etc. We have them because we like to go out to the range and shoot a target.

Under these circumstances I am not opposed to people owning guns.

Actually, Link, the police and sheriff back in the western days were mostly there to make sure people didn't have guns. Back in the day, cattle towns were pretty wild places. There were always at least a few cowboys who had just gotten off the trail and were taking some time off to rest up and get drunk. None of these cowboys actually lived in the towns. Almost all of them had guns. The sheriffs got their start when people started settling down and having families. They didn't feel very safe around all the cowboys carrying revolvers. Many sheriffs made laws against carrying guns into town--you had to leave them someplace where they all got locked up before you could go into any buildings.

Actually, Link, the police and sheriff back in the western days were mostly there to make sure people didn't have guns.

Actually I think that's the UK 😱

Re: Do guns in the home make us safer?

Originally posted by Agent Elrond
I have to do a project where I have to say that guns in home make America more unsafe than if there were no guns. All I need are basic arguments; try not to get angry. Your help is greatly appreciated.

I think guns are very safe to have in the household. What if someone broke in and you didn't know how to defend yourself and you weren't near a phone? I couldn't sleep if I didn't have my gun next to me.