ahhh...she WAS the best auditioner there though, well at least from MOST of the girls. that ONE audtioner(one with the white tanktop) who was in the top 12 was 5 foot 8, and rest of them weren't so great looking for the part. Plus, she could have been good at acting. MAYBE if there were picture sof teh 4000 girls who looked and acted better, then that could say something, but so far, there hasn't been solid proof. Considering the girls who were picked to be the finalists, and the pictures of the long lines, and close ups of others, she was a lot prettier than all of them/looked the right age more than them. She was the best audtioner there, so I'm not disapointed, and I'm not going to dislike her based on her looks. and about teh ced comment, nothing can be concluded, except that I don't think that they are interested in each other. She probably isn't interested in him either. Shes not that terrible, like she doesn't look like frankenstein or anything. People are acting as though they casted the HULK or something. I mean, if you saw her down the street, would you really catagorize her as ugly? By ugly, I mean those examples above. She has extradinarily regular features, nothing is really scary about her, so shes at least a little below avergae, not hideous.
however, IF it was all based on looks, here are some reasons.
http://veritaserum.com/media/feb/choauditions.shtml
Those are most of the auditioners.
http://veritaserum.com/movies/movie4/valeriepics.shtml
NOT the right age (looks wise, would look bad with cedric)
http://veritaserum.com/movies/movie4/cho/natashapics.shtml
way to old looking
I would have rather have had someone who looked the right age and can act, than someone who well, was like those auditioners above.
THerefore, in the end, nothing could be done. While she may not be exatly teh BEST canditate for Cho, she is one of the best. Nothing could really be done. I don't find her pretty, but I'm not disapointed, because the audtions came and went, and 4000 came, and she happened to be the best.
Hmm...Everyone has a different opinion about her. And mine is that she's not hideous, but I'm not going as far as to say she's pretty. I might sound mean, but that's just what I think. The reason I go on about it is because I'm really disappointed. Maybe she was the best there, maybe she wasn't....But I don't think so, and this is what I think. I dislike her, and will do until I see the film and definitely make up my mind.
EDIT: Yeah, those are a few people in the line....there were 4000 girls. I don't think those picture sum it up. And I was in the line....Like I've said before, I don't know whether I saw Katie, but if I did I don't actually think I'd have looked twice at her...Oh well, we'll have to wait until the film I suppose.
Dislike her looks you mean? I'm not going to actually dislike people based on looks. Yes, it is a maybe, but there is so much more proof that when they were eliminating thousands of girls based on looks, that they picked ones that weren't even the right age, that she was one of the best. If she is a good actress, then that gives her an even better chance. There really wasn't anything that could have been done. I think that the finalists really do show that she is one of teh best. (top 36 and top 12 and that other pic of the top 12, where only that waaay too tall girl was prettier than her)
I'm not going to deny that I dislike her looks, but that's just so far. Like I said, I'm going to have the same view until I see the film. We haven't seen all the final 36 or final 12, we're not really ones to talk. From the ones I've seen, I believe some of them would've been better suited. Again, this is just my opinion, and I will stick to it no matter what anyone tells me 😛 And yeah, she could be a good actress, we'll see 😊
http://www.robertpattinson.org/gall...9a90c8f22e35944
That is her (with contacts)
Originally posted by Anan340
Yes, but the fact that they (the 12 year oldish looking one and the 20 year oldish looking one )fit in the stadnards to BE in teh to 12 or top 36 says a lot.
It says that they rushed choosing, which they did....For 4000 girls it took them only a couple of days to choose they're 36 😬
Originally posted by Snoopbert
Prove to me she's a good actress.
Eh, I would have thought that for those two(they CLEARLY look teh wrong age), it was pretty obvious that they were all wrong, espcially for a 5 foot 8 girl.
I mean, people immediately assumed that she was not pretty, too tall, not freckles, etc. Based on looks, it isn't really that hard to rush, because if they had to take the time on whether or not a girl is pretty, then they probably won't want to choose her, theyll want someone who makes the best impression for the movie. And its not liek theyve never done this before, theyre probably used to it.
Originally posted by Anan340
Prove to me that shes not. All I am saying is that she MAY be. So who can judge? That is all that is being said. Plus, it was based on acting too, and a lot of the articles say that shes a natural.
What I'm trying to say is that we have to wait for the film (obviously) and that I'm not changing my mind about her until I see whether she is a "natural" or not. Articles may say it, but they all also praise Emma and Dan's acting (no offense to Emma and Dan fans) but they're acting is appalling in my opinion. So I won't trust articles just yet.