Katie Leung [the cho-sen one]

Started by Anan34053 pages

Thats why I said it was a maybe, just wanted to put in some stuff about her acting.

Originally posted by Anan340
Prove to me that shes not. All I am saying is that she MAY be. So who can judge? That is all that is being said. Plus, it was based on acting too, and a lot of the articles say that shes a natural.

Prove to me they're correct.

Er, I'm NOT. Thats why I said that it was a maybe, and not makiing any assumptions.

Then stop, because that is subjective material. Maybe's aren't allowed in Debates.

What are you talking about? I never even said that I wanted to debate on her acting skills, that would jsut be stupid. All I am saying is that she was fairly chosen.

Doesn't look that way.

Yeah... 😕 😬

Why do you say that?

You seem to be more of a fangirl... a fangirl of someone who hasn't even been in a single movie yet.

I also find it odd that you're stalking this thread.

Um what are you talking about. I am clearly NOT a fan at all, I find her to be average looking. And that is why I said maybe, because I am not juding, if i was a fan, i would have said yes she is a GREAT actress. You seem to be more of a hater then, because you obviously don't think taht she was fairly chosen, without solid proof of anything,

I am not stalking anything, this thread is about the her, it can be for those who are for her or against her, or someone who is neutral. I don't find her to be pretty, and I am not afraid to say it, but I am saying that it is unfair to say that she does not deserve th role, when no one has seen the movie yet. Also, quit with teh ad hominem.

Did I say that? You don't assume, that only makes you look ignorant. I'm not a "hater" of someone i've enver seen act. I might have a personal dislike for her for personal reasons, but those normally don't affect my logic. She might've been fairly chosen, but only in the eyes of someone who might not have had half a brain. And if you weren't a fan, then why are you defending "her side"?

Might not have half a brain? That is extremly insulting. What if I was a fan, with a different standard of beauty, would I be considered to have half a brain? I was only doing what you were doing, insulting someone by jsut assuming.
I am not a fan, because I don't judge someone until I have seen them act, which is why, again, I said maybe. I was saying that the audition process was fair, because she appears to be one of the best auditioners. I did not say that she was perfect Cho or anything, I said that I thought that she was the most qualified out of the auditioners.

Insulting to who? You? Did you choose her to be the actress for the part?

Insulting because you are claiming that those who find her to be pretty enough for the role have half a brain. Just because you arn't insulting me, doesnt mean that that comment wasn't offensive.

Oh, did I now? Let me quote that for you:

Originally posted by Snoopbert
Did I say that? You don't assume, that only makes you look ignorant. I'm not a "hater" of someone i've enver seen act. I might have a personal dislike for her for personal reasons, but those normally don't affect my logic. She might've been fairly chosen, but only in the eyes of someone who might not have had half a brain. And if you weren't a fan, then why are you defending "her side"?

Note the word "Might" there. It was a hypothetical scenario.

Notice how youa re attacking the person rather than the subject at hand. Even if I was a fangirl, that doesn't change the subject. You re assuming a lot about me, but that doesn't even matter. I found that there were 4000 other audtioners there, and that they had just as much of a chance as her. All fo tehm had their pics taken, all of them tried out. How else could she have been picked. HAD the auditons been rushed, would they not have assumed that she wasn't pretty, and not chosen her. But apparently, at least, they found her to be the most qualified.
that ONE audtioner(one with the white tanktop) who was in the top 12 was 5 foot 8, and rest of them weren't so great looking for the part. Plus, she could have been good at acting. MAYBE if there were picture sof teh 4000 girls who looked and acted better, then that could say something, but so far, there hasn't been solid proof. Considering the girls who were picked to be the finalists, and the pictures of the long lines, and close ups of others, she was a lot prettier than all of them/looked the right age more than them.
however, IF it was all based on looks, here are some reasons.
http://veritaserum.com/media/feb/choauditions.shtml
Those are most of the auditioners.
http://veritaserum.com/movies/movie4/valeriepics.shtml
NOT the right age (looks wise, would look bad with cedric)
http://veritaserum.com/movies/movie...tashapics.shtml
Based on looks, it isn't really that hard to rush, because if they had to take the time on whether or not a girl is pretty, then they probably won't want to choose her, theyll want someone who makes the best impression for the movie. And its not liek theyve never done this before, theyre probably used to it.
And that pic of the four girls, msot likely theyw ere the top 12, because what a coincidence that the girl who was in the top 12 out of 4000 was in the pic. Plus, that other girl, that one that is too tall happens tob e in the pic.

When was I attacking you? You did say you weren't interested in a debate, but it looks otherwise. 🙄 Thanks for proving my point, I'm done in this thread.

That it not most 😐 There were 4000 girls.....In those pictures there's like 100 😕 and you can't even see them properly 😬