should women be aloud to fight on ..........

Started by Juk3n19 pages

Originally posted by chithappens
I'm not sure even sure why you bring this up. I think you would be hard-pressed to find anyone who thinks human males are not going to be physically stronger than a human woman if "trained equally."

To me, that's a moot point.

Point is simple - Strongest in front rest behind - phrase "only as strong as your weakest link" is the most true phrase you will ever hear, it also has one simple counter - Have stronger weak links! Men!!

Do you even know who Sun Tzu is?

Originally posted by chithappens
Do you even know who Sun Tzu is?

What does Three Kingdoms Chinese Tactician have to do with this?

Originally posted by Juk3n
Have stronger weak links!

Well, that's a contradiction in terms. How about, in that case, we just not have any weak links?

Speaking of Sun Tzu, anyone seen the documentary "Mulan", she kicked some ass on the battle field.

Originally posted by Devil King
Well, that's a contradiction in terms. How about, in that case, we just not have any weak links?

Just means - (for the sake of this thread) if your weak link male is stronger than the Strongest Female link..Take the male, afterall..Its war, and you want all the advantages you can get.

Re: should women be aloud to fight on ..........

Originally posted by lady T
should they be able to fight in war if wanted im front line if they wanted to? i thiink women who want to fight on the front line should

If women or anyone for that matter wants to go fight, then just go fight. I'm sick of all this 'you have to be in the military if you want to go fight in a war.' That's crap. People need to start thinking outside the box. If you want to fight in a war, go to where the war is, pull out a weapon, and start fighting. It's really that simple.

Re: Re: should women be aloud to fight on ..........

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
If women or anyone for that matter wants to go fight, then just go fight. I'm sick of all this 'you have to be in the military if you want to go fight in a war.' That's crap. People need to start thinking outside the box. If you want to fight in a war, go to where the war is, pull out a weapon, and start fighting. It's really that simple.

That's an elaborate way of committing suicide, not fighting a war.

Re: Re: Re: should women be aloud to fight on ..........

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That's an elaborate way of committing suicide, not fighting a war.

Not if you happen to be Chuck Norris.

True. True hmm

In a war you are meant to play to your strengths. It would be an utterly stupid strategy if one army decided to field mostly women in their frontlines against another army feilding men considering that it is obvious to evn the most persistent feminist that men are considerably superior physically to women.

Originally posted by ultimatethor
In a war you are meant to play to your strengths. It would be an utterly stupid strategy if one army decided to field mostly women in their frontlines against another army feilding men considering that it is obvious to evn the most persistent feminist that men are considerably superior physically to women.

If the same requirements existed there would be no functional difference.

Re: Re: Re: should women be aloud to fight on ..........

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That's an elaborate way of committing suicide, not fighting a war.

Exactly, so people should stop complaining about it.

Boudica was a fisty old gal,sacked several roman towns.
If you come to london here statue is by westminster pier.Standing in her chariot arm raised,apparently charging at the houses of parliament.