Originally posted by WindDancer
I hope Bradbury sues Moore's.http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/21/bradbury.fahrenheit.ap/index.html
Oh, I'm sorry! I forget! The media distorts the truth but not Moore. 🙄
last time I looked, the word 'fahrenheight' was not copywrited. besides, the numbers are different, so it is an utterly invalid claim.
so there! 😛
😉
Originally posted by WindDancer
I hope Bradbury sues Moore's.http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/06/21/bradbury.fahrenheit.ap/index.html
Oh, I'm sorry! I forget! The media distorts the truth but not Moore. 🙄
Oh my gawd Ray Bradbury is still alive?!?...anywho
Yup! He still alive and kicking! 😄
LMAO! When will the madness ever stop?!?!
Originally posted by Vengeance
k, back when i was in school we were read that and it always claims that anything that bad happened to him was a white mans fault, and he even goes to say that black men are infact better then the white becuase they have done nothing to hurt him and when they do it goes on the news. or some crap like that. so if thats not racist then w/e man you go dream your dream. but in my opionin grizzly adams is a racist, and a stupid one seeing that he is indeed a white man.
You know what the other thing about that book is? It's a comedy. It's meant to be funny. Not all of it is 100% serious. Mike Moore isn't a racist, get the hell over it.
Originally posted by Darth Revan
You know what the other thing about that book is? It's a comedy. It's meant to be funny. Not all of it is 100% serious. Mike Moore isn't a racist, get the hell over it.
Originally posted by Darth Revan
uh... Excuse me, but if you haven't noticed, Michael Moore IS white. He doesn't hate white men, that's ridiculous.I agree with BackFire for once... Yes he has an opinion, yes he is voicing it very strongly, but he never said the film was non-partisan. You accuse him of being biased, as if it's a horrible crime, when he himself admits to it. Another thing is, there are so damn many CONSERVATIVE guys out there doing exactly the same thing, what's wrong with having one liberal doing it? Plus, Moore is funnier than all the conservative talk show hosts combined 😛
can you imagine michael SAVAGE doing a movie like this? it would be three hours of exposition about the black and hispanic conspiracey to destroy white america by spreading homosexuality and furthering the gay agenda. What about anne coulter? she'd probably make a Joseph Goebbles styles propaganda film featuring "liberal" rats scurying through the streets and claiming that liberals are the lowest caste in society. btw, she's made some very interesting comments recently about "jewish infiltration" in the democratic party.
My point is that of all the pundits, moore is the funniest and most creative. and people who use the word "liberal" in the same way that war hawks used words like "pinko" and "faggot" during the vietnam war should get their dictionaries and look up the word. Liberalism is the foundation of this country. unfortunately, nearly all of our current politicians can be categorized as either right-authoritarians (fascists), libertarians, and religious conservatives (not true conservatives).
if you would like to live in an illiberal democrasy, i recommend India, Russia, and Mexico.
so please, unlike the retards on fox news or on AM radio, please make sure you can define words like "conservative" and "liberal" before you fling them around.
Originally posted by Vengeance
lol u think its a comedy if that was a comedy then no one would pay serious attention to it. and think not about what he says.which would infact take away a few dollars that he would spend on porn and donuts.
I think the correct term is ironic. THe book (although I haven't read it, but I can still judge by it's title and content matter which was discussed in these forums) has a lot of irony.
"last time I looked, the word 'fahrenheight' was not copywrited. besides, the numbers are different, so it is an utterly invalid claim"
Give me a break. Bradbury is (rightfully) afraid that the public will subconsciously connect Moore's film with his book. Since Moore's film has been in the public eye, whats the first thing you think of when I say "Farenheit 451'? Mr. Bradbury is totally justified in his contempt, I say. Can't the far left nuts think up their own damn names? First Franken rips off O'Reilly, and now this. All politics aside, thats just uncreative...and unprofessional.
Moore should truthfully advertise his films as fictional and one man's opinion. When your moviemaking style incorporates quoting people out of context, creative editing of interviews, leaving important facts out of your commentary to strengthen your points and staging events for your film, you aren't making a documentary.
Its convenient that Moore's films never have a counterpoint. No surprise though, when youre twisting the truth as much as him, you don't want a devil's advocate. His films are clearly made for the shiftless masses, people that don't want to have to form their own opinions or see through the lies shoved down their throats.
Better that Moore convert these idiots to the far left, thats where idiots belong.
BTW, as a middle-conservative, Even I am scared of a Michael Savage movie. Yipes!
Michael Moore is nothing more than an Anti-American, Bush hating, bin Laden sympathizing, opportunistic "documentary" film maker.
What more proof do you need to back these claims than the following..
Michael Medved pressed Michael Moore's agents & distributors to reject Hezbolla's endorsement of his Fahrenheit 9/11 propaganda effort. Medved received official rejection of such calls today with Moores' agents noting that to do so would deny Moore the millions of $$$ he is expecting to receive from his terrorist supporters in Lebanon + Syria.
Moore is knowingly about to accept terrorist funding for the distribution of his film, in turn funding the Hezbollah terrorist clan. Correct me if I am wrong, but thats a violation of federal law, the Patriot Act, and he should immediatly be investigated and subsequently prosecuted, no?
I give you, Michael Moore. Jihad's newest supporter.