Official Spiderman 3 Updates & News thread

Started by Mr Parker114 pages

Originally posted by Freddy_vs_Jason
Mr. Parker above the place were your avatar would be it says "loyal spiderman fan" but a loyal Spider-Man fan would not change the name to Man-Spider too suit himself.

But in Spidey 3 when J.J.J son comes back he could maybe just bring back the symbiote which finds its way to Eddie Brock. But I think bringing Venom in so soon to the movies is wrong, in every sequel the villians should become a bit more dangerous and stronger, like its obvious that Doc. Ock is a bit stronger then The Green Goblin, as I've seen in a clip from Spidey 2, Spider-Man is thrown through the windshield or a cab by Doc. Ock, but Venom is a LOT stronger then Doc. Ock so it's giving the villains a step-up to big and fast.

I would personally like to see a connection with Venom in Spidey 3 like Spidey gets his black costume which is the Symbiote. AND COULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME MYSTERIOS POWERS, EITHER THE OLD OR NEW ONE I DON'T CARE, thank you.

Also I'm very sure that The Lizard will not be in Spidey 3 because The Lizard is in the Spidey 2 game, and Sony and Activision would not just give Lizard a bigger role in the third game, it would either be he's not in the second game but in the 3rd movie, or hes in the second game but not in the same movie. And they choose to put him in the Spidey 2 game.

its not to suit myself,that IS the character he has become now because he is a damn monster now because of the organics just like he was called manspider in the spiderman 90's cartoon show because he transformed into a monster he is ALSO MAN-SPIDER now because he still is a monster because of the organics hence ORGANICS=MAN-SPIDER. 🙄

The Spider-Man movies (or Man-Spider if you prefer) have sinned against us too much to go out and change the origin of a character. If Eddie + The Symbiote do not = VENOM, then there are going to be far too many pissed off people.

Introducing Eddie can take place during the third movie, while Spidey is busy with whoever they throw in there. The main character in any movie has to evolve a little, grow somewhat, or nobody will care; comic fan or not.

Regardless, they have changed TOO MUCH to screw this up.

Didn't I say that S2 would end with "to be continued..." a cliffhanger of sorts? I said it in another thread if Venom is to make an appearance in S2. With S3, S4, S5 & S6 already contracted for I would expect nothing less. The universe of Spiderman is a huge franchise and having a series of movies to flesh out the characters is a great idea!

Originally posted by Mr Parker
its not to suit myself,that IS the character he has become now because he is a damn monster now because of the organics just like he was called manspider in the spiderman 90's cartoon show because he transformed into a monster he is ALSO MAN-SPIDER now because he still is a monster because of the organics hence ORGANICS=MAN-SPIDER. 🙄

Okay, I'm not attacking you or something like that, but I just don't see the problem here. If I understand it correctly, you consider the Spider-Man of the movies as a monster ONLY because he has, in the movies, organic webshooters instead of his (dated) webcanisters ? Organic webshooters, who make more sense by the way... he HAS something of a spider in him after all, so he has got to have some way to produce a web.

Recently, somebody wrote on the forum (do not remember where) that the webshooters are the soul of Spider-Man. Not true. The heart and soul of Spider-Man are his determination, his courage, his sense of humor, his strength, his reflexes, the ability to climb walls and of course his spider-sense.

His webshooters are of course also quite important, no denying that, but it only serves him as a means of transportation, and also comes in handy when fighting some criminals/villains. But it is definitely not the soul of Spider-Man, by no means.

Without his webshooters, he remains exactly the same man and hero he always was.

I never understood why the organic webshooters-thing is such a big deal. Films based on comics are NEVER the same, far far from it. Only a few minor changes have been made in this movie, so that the story could be acceptable for the non-Spidey-lovers too.

Originally posted by Reborn Again
Didn't I say that S2 would end with "to be continued..." a cliffhanger of sorts? I said it in another thread if Venom is to make an appearance in S2. With S3, S4, S5 & S6 already contracted for I would expect nothing less. The universe of Spiderman is a huge franchise and having a series of movies to flesh out the characters is a great idea!

How do you know this? And you sound like a representative of Sony, that sounds very much like a press release to me.

And why would you expect nothing less for Venom in S3?

I know a lot of comic book fans would expect no less than for Venom to make his appearance PROPERLY - which means S3 is WAAAAAY too early for him.

Originally posted by who?-kid
Okay, I'm not attacking you or something like that, but I just don't see the problem here. If I understand it correctly, you consider the Spider-Man of the movies as a monster ONLY because he has, in the movies, organic webshooters instead of his (dated) webcanisters ? Organic webshooters, who make more sense by the way... he HAS something of a spider in him after all, so he has got to have some way to produce a web.

Recently, somebody wrote on the forum (do not remember where) that the webshooters are the soul of Spider-Man. Not true. The heart and soul of Spider-Man are his determination, his courage, his sense of humor, his strength, his reflexes, the ability to climb walls and of course his spider-sense.

His webshooters are of course also quite important, no denying that, but it only serves him as a means of transportation, and also comes in handy when fighting some criminals/villains. But it is definitely not the soul of Spider-Man, by no means.

Without his webshooters, he remains exactly the same man and hero he always was.

I never understood why the organic webshooters-thing is such a big deal. Films based on comics are NEVER the same, far far from it. Only a few minor changes have been made in this movie, so that the story could be acceptable for the non-Spidey-lovers too.

it was me but i dont remember where. its is truly part of Spiderman, soul,im talkin spiderman not pete, cos without the web canister he jump climb wall and super jump, the "spider sense" he had even before being bitten by tha radioactive spider...........as one secret file showed....as they are changin everything, theres was even a gy that said peter was like a egipitian god or so, i dont know if this is true,, the wall stick of parker is magnetic not like spiders and not like in the movie.without the webshooter he wouldnt swing trhow the city of new york and would be a second level daredevil.STATE made.

I respect your opinion, but I don't agree with it. Let's just leave it to that 😉.

Well, I have read from numerous sourses that the end of SM2 has Harry finding his dads hideout and all the goblin stuff. Add to that the no-brainer of Venom appearing in the movies and I come up with this:

In SM3 Harry will become a goblin (hopefully the Hobgoblin) and Jameson will bring the symbiote back from space (sorry, but the animated version works better than the Secret Wars version on film). Also a sub-plot featuring Brock's growing hatred for Parker will have to happen in 3. The symbiote will bond with Parker, and Spidey will kick the goblins a$$ so bad and so viciously that he will give up the symbiote, realizing that it makes him crazy. The end of SM 3 will have Brock bonding with the symbiote and SM 4 will be all set up.

I hope one of the last movies has the entire Sinsiter Six. How sick would that be on the big screen!?!?!

Re: Venom WILL be in Spider-Man 3!!!!!!!!! click here for details!

Originally posted by Freddy_vs_Jason
I was searching this site and it said that Kraven and The Chameleon might be in Spidey 3 but some guy who works at song pictures said this:

"I worked at Sony while they were putting together the script for #2 and fleshing out the basic story for #3 and I tell you, the last guy who left that stupid stuff about Kraven and The Chameleon was totally wrong. Spider Man 2 will leave off with a bit of a cliffhanger which will lead to #3, which will be friggin' AWESOME! Trust me, the villain WILL be VENOM. As you will see in #2 Mary Jane will marry J.J. Jameson's son who is an astronaut and planning to go up into space. This will pull Mary Jane away from Peter and in Peter's eyes keep her "safe". Well hold on, while in space J.J. Jameson's son will be infected by some weird alien organism. The alien will travel back to earth with him and J.J. Jameson's son will either become VENOM or Peter will be infected with VENOM and go on a rampage. Either way Spider Man will have to KILL J.J. Jameson's son/Mary Jane's husband in the end, which will bring Peter and Mary-Jane back together again. That's what I read as the summary of Spider Man #3, as you know they can change it, but from what I read, it will be Friggin' BAD ASS!!! You will be blown away, Sam really is the man when it comes to directing these things" . Thanks to DarkHorizons.com and Aint-it-Cool-News.

I apologise for some of the material in that but I didn't write it, heres the link:

http://www.efavata.com/CBM/Spiderman3.htm

From watching the 1st movie I am going to say that Eddie Brock will ultimately end up as Venom because they were talking about Eddie in J.J.'s office before Peter shows up with his first pics of Spiderman.

venom could work. maybe sam rami will take the actor and use cgi for the venom suite.

not only will brock be human but when brock turns into venom they can use c.g.i. or just a cgi venom and have an actor do the voice.

Spiderman Rj I'm not sure if you realise this but in the movie Spider-Man can stick to walls due to tiny hairs on his fingers which I think is better because the static electricity thing seems to fruity, no spider crawls walls because of static electricity.

Originally posted by Freddy_vs_Jason
Spiderman Rj I'm not sure if you realise this but in the movie Spider-Man can stick to walls due to tiny hairs on his fingers which I think is better because the static electricity thing seems to fruity, no spider crawls walls because of static electricity.

At least it explained how he could stick to walls wearring shoes and gloves.

I'd like to see the "tiny-hairs" concept get around that one so easily.

I'm not sure about that one, the hairs can probably go right through his gloves as the material isn't that thick, also the small hairs on his hands are so strong that he might not need to use his feet.

the glove statement u made is aceptible , but theres no way phisicaly he can stick into a wall and climb it iwithout using his feet (i say phisicaly becouse spider isnt as superman so gravity DOES have her share on his fantasy world, only not when he jumps)
and the static is more like that geek lizard, so more belieble and like sup red said i get away easily with the shoes wich was my doubt when i first met spidey comics.i personaly HATE the tiny hairs more than organics webbing when i saw the movie.........even if he has it there was no need to show us that (ok maybe sami though it would be more the arachne way) so Mr parker thats a trhut that the movie is indeed spider-man movie and the comics we read for long man-spider ones. LOL just kidding no need to come back to this issue again ok?

Originally posted by Freddy_vs_Jason
Spiderman Rj I'm not sure if you realise this but in the movie Spider-Man can stick to walls due to tiny hairs on his fingers which I think is better because the static electricity thing seems to fruity, no spider crawls walls because of static electricity.

about "fruity" go on nasa research site open to public and read the fruitivity of electric static.............yah like
WOW

there isnt no clue now, that parker aquired his power due to the "radioactive spider" anymore .so we cant tell he climbs like a spider.theres a old guy with parker sames habilities..........

but theres no way phisicaly he can stick into a wall and climb it iwithout using his feet

Spidey is pretty strong...he can throw cars around. Theres no way you can say he couldn't lift his own body weight up the side of a building using only his hands.

NOW we're looking too much into this.

The comics thought about it, the movies didn't, end of story.

And, if Lizard isn't in Spidey 3, I'd like to see Harry Hobgoblin. I don't want Harry to be 2nd GReen Gobby, and the Hobgoblin character was weak anyway - so I'd love them to make Harry Hobgoblin.

But - don't you think another Goblin is a little um, too soon?

It would make sense for the movies to go:

1) Green Gobby

2) Ock

3) The Lizard

4) Venom

5) Harrys Hobgoblin

6) I'd like to see Scorpion, but Carnage would be great too.

I think that sequence breaks up the villains perfectly.

They would have to end 6 with a great finale though - so who could they use to save until the final movie?

Originally posted by Creechuur
Spidey is pretty strong...he can throw cars around. Theres no way you can say he couldn't lift his own body weight up the side of a building using only his hands.

lets make it clear. u´re completely right about the strong fact.ok? but think in moving not only up. but asides without ur legs suporting u? have u ever clmbing or rafting.yah just try it without using ur legs would be the same......to go up he wouldnt have problems but to the side or on diagonals he would not be able to.

Originally posted by Red Superfly
NOW we're looking too much into this.

The comics thought about it, the movies didn't, end of story.

And, if Lizard isn't in Spidey 3, I'd like to see Harry Hobgoblin. I don't want Harry to be 2nd GReen Gobby, and the Hobgoblin character was weak anyway - so I'd love them to make Harry Hobgoblin.

But - don't you think another Goblin is a little um, too soon?

It would make sense for the movies to go:

1) Green Gobby

2) Ock

3) The Lizard

4) Venom

5) Harrys Hobgoblin

6) I'd like to see Scorpion, but Carnage would be great too.

I think that sequence breaks up the villains perfectly.

They would have to end 6 with a great finale though - so who could they use to save until the final movie?

who are u taking as hobbie the first or the second? the second was pretty strong ......and smart...........
the last one should be kraven definetely and the movie should be like lord of the rings 2;:40 or so. would be great .do u agree?