Black Cat = Mary Jane Watson

Started by Movie_Geek_7 pages

Well I think they could of found a better person to play MJ but they can not change out the actress other wise the people who do not know the real SM story ( which is most people ) will freak.

Re: Black Cat = Mary Jane Watson

Originally posted by abys_ad
..Id just find it interesting if MJ comes into the 3rd movie becoming the black cat!..

Although it may sound retarted. Hey! anything could happen. 😱 and Kristen Dunst get to wear that tight black suit. 😆

-If you think Im F***** crazy.. 🤘 well, too bad.

Stupid idea. What the hell are you thinkin. The movies are screwing up Spider-man as it is. Now, when kids see the movie with MJ as the Black Cat, and then they start reading the comics, they'll be confused. I was confused when Peter Parker had his own organic webbing in the movies.....

Originally posted by Mr Parker
and neither was organics or mary janes character being much more like gwen stacy or doc ock being a nice guy and turning good at the end and nothing like mj from the comics ect.I have said this time and time again,I am all for changes just as long as they are reasonable changes.The changes made in these two films were completely stupid and unreasonable.those changes I mentioned were NOT needed either so since they are making changes that are not needed,might as well make mary jane the black cat at this point as well.

for goodness sake! Just because some stuff in Spider-Man changed doesn't mean they'd change the identity. they change some character's personality. and they changed the webs to organic because... think about it... the audience wouldn't believe that an eighteen-year-old would create a webshooter all by himself if scientists are STILL trying to figure out what webs are made of, and not to mention how much money problems peter has that he could even buy that material. plus, do you know how bulky the webshooter would look? no one would believe that that thing would be under his glove! and the changes in the films are made to make it more understandable to the comics.

I agree with #1 Rupert_Lover you guy are being a little harsh. I do not really like CD as MJ but it is not like she was bad as the character or or anything.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
for goodness sake! Just because some stuff in Spider-Man changed doesn't mean they'd change the identity. they change some character's personality. and they changed the webs to organic because... think about it... the audience wouldn't believe that an eighteen-year-old would create a webshooter all by himself if scientists are STILL trying to figure out what webs are made of, and not to mention how much money problems peter has that he could even buy that material. plus, do you know how bulky the webshooter would look? no one would believe that that thing would be under his glove! and the changes in the films are made to make it more understandable to the comics.

chick/dude,
if the writers of Spider-man comics can make the readers believe the webshooter thing, why not th e audience of the movie?

What about Elisha Cuthbert for Felicia Hardy/Black Cat?

Eliza Dushku
Jessica Alba
are perfect to play The Black Cat

Originally posted by freezedoom
Eliza Dushku
Jessica Alba
are perfect to play The Black Cat

Jessica Alba already played invisible woman in the fantastic four, though. didn't she?

Originally posted by WAF3001
chick/dude,
if the writers of Spider-man comics can make the readers believe the webshooter thing, why not th e audience of the movie?

because that was a comicbook. comicbooks have a reputation of being unrealistic. movies, on the other hand, are different. they would've had to put in a whole explanation of how Spider-Man doesn't accidentally hit the button that shoots out webbing every time he punches a bad guy. it's more easier to explain if the audience sees that it's organic, and only shoots out using a hand gesture. it gives it a better explanation, and it's a quicker explanation as well. people want quick explanations when it comes to movies.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
Jessica Alba already played invisible woman in the fantastic four, though. didn't she?

HELL YEAH SHE DID!!!droolio

Originally posted by freezedoom
Eliza Dushku
Jessica Alba
are perfect to play The Black Cat

I think Eliza Dushku would make a great black cat.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
for goodness sake! Just because some stuff in Spider-Man changed doesn't mean they'd change the identity. they change some character's personality. and they changed the webs to organic because... think about it... the audience wouldn't believe that an eighteen-year-old would create a webshooter all by himself if scientists are STILL trying to figure out what webs are made of, and not to mention how much money problems peter has that he could even buy that material. plus, do you know how bulky the webshooter would look? no one would believe that that thing would be under his glove! and the changes in the films are made to make it more understandable to the comics.

Please stop it with that laughable and old lame excuse about a teenage kid creating a chemical that no scientists could create that an audience wouldnt believe it.According to that adsurd logic then classic movies like Back to the future where things that happened in that movie are much more far fectched than things that happened in manspider.According to your adsurd logic,movies like that shouldnt be made.I also addressed that issue to you once before but I see you chose to ignore it that thats no more unbelievable than a kid gaining the powers of a spider from a spiderbite able to walk on walls ect,if anything,thats just as much unbelieveable as the mechs are and there are other things in that movie that are far more unbeliveable as that is. This is hollywood we are talking about,you would be surprised at the things they can pull off.they dont have to show the mechs under the gloves but I see you fail to use your imagination on that or that would have occured to you.We also dont know that the chemicals he gets is not inexpensive.The organics were only in the film because of sheer laziness on Raimi's part but I see you choose not to believe that as well.

Originally posted by #1Rupert_Lover
because that was a comicbook. comicbooks have a reputation of being unrealistic. movies, on the other hand, are different. they would've had to put in a whole explanation of how Spider-Man doesn't accidentally hit the button that shoots out webbing every time he punches a bad guy. it's more easier to explain if the audience sees that it's organic, and only shoots out using a hand gesture. it gives it a better explanation, and it's a quicker explanation as well. people want quick explanations when it comes to movies.

Your crippling your arguments here big time.Only you are going to be thinking about that,not the general audience.It would be very simple for them to use a quick explanation for all of those things they mentioned with competent screenwriters which they havent had in any of these movies yet. It would be very simple for him to explain that l in the film when constructing the mechs that he has to hit it twice with his palm quickly and thats why it doesnt happen.I have said this before,it can all be done with a quick 5 minute montage sequence.That would have been cool as heck to see.It would have been awesome to see him testing his webbing and constructing his mechs,but no hollywood goes and dumbs down his character making him a dude who is nothing special as a person now.Next question.Although Im sure you wont remember it once I give you the answer. 🙄

Originally posted by doctorstrongbad
I think Eliza Dushku would make a great black cat.

That's why she played Faith in Buffy: the Vampire Slayer.

Eliza Dushku: [Yep, perfect!]

because that was a comicbook. comicbooks have a reputation of being unrealistic. movies, on the other hand, are different. they would've had to put in a whole explanation of how Spider-Man doesn't accidentally hit the button that shoots out webbing every time he punches a bad guy. it's more easier to explain if the audience sees that it's organic, and only shoots out using a hand gesture. it gives it a better explanation, and it's a quicker explanation as well. people want quick explanations when it comes to movies.

Wait, by the logic of the filmmakers he doesn't have the knowledge or resources to make webshooters, yet he can magically create some intricate spandex spidey-jammies? How's a teenage kid gonna do that? Does he have a spider-sweatshop somewhere?

To tell the truth, I didn't even care about the organic webbing. That scene was more about discovering his newfound powers than where the webbing originated from.

Originally posted by Next Venom_girl
Weird thread.
Know what's weirder? Ultimate Spider-man Strange Part 2. MJ appears in both Black Cat's and Elektra's costumes. tomato

Plz post Pics...
And I dont give a F*ck who Plays her so long as SHE is HOT....Any one think it would have been Kewl if She got Toxin's Symbiote when mulligan was Barfing? She was very hot at that moment... Wat about Pamela anderson for Black Cat...Shes got the body.

Originally posted by Next Venom_girl
Wait, by the logic of the filmmakers he doesn't have the knowledge or resources to make webshooters, yet he can magically create some intricate spandex spidey-jammies? How's a teenage kid gonna do that? Does he have a spider-sweatshop somewhere?

Actually, I read the Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 movie novels, and When you read it, you learn that he actually got the costume from a guy who makes wrestling outfits, who had offered Peter to let him design a wrestling costume if he ever desided to become a professional wrestler, after peter's amazing wrestling match, performance. so Peter went there with the wrestling outfit on (Including the mask), and showed the man his sketches. and the man gladly designed it for him for free. And since Directors and screenwriters HIRE these guys to write the stories in book layout, They probably told him to put that in.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Please stop it with that laughable and old lame excuse about a teenage kid creating a chemical that no scientists could create that an audience wouldnt believe it.According to that adsurd logic then classic movies like Back to the future where things that happened in that movie are much more far fectched than things that happened in manspider.According to your adsurd logic,movies like that shouldnt be made.I also addressed that issue to you once before but I see you chose to ignore it that thats no more unbelievable than a kid gaining the powers of a spider from a spiderbite able to walk on walls ect,if anything,thats just as much unbelieveable as the mechs are and there are other things in that movie that are far more unbeliveable as that is. This is hollywood we are talking about,you would be surprised at the things they can pull off.they dont have to show the mechs under the gloves but I see you fail to use your imagination on that or that would have occured to you.We also dont know that the chemicals he gets is not inexpensive.The organics were only in the film because of sheer laziness on Raimi's part but I see you choose not to believe that as well.

Dude, Back to the Future had a SCIENTIST in it, of course he'd be able to build a time machine. it's not an eighteen year old boy who made it. Marty in that movie just got mixed up in that mess he was in. That's totally different. and the reason I disreguarded your explanation was because it was a stupid excuse. There doesn't have to be an explanation for organics. the only reason you don't like the organics is because peter uses webshooters in the comics. but I bet that if it happened differently, and Spider-Man shot organic web, you'd go with organics.