Originally posted by Vengeance
well plp might think he is a super hero and who knows maybe your right CD but he's a super loser when it comes to box office charts lol.
The 2 movies combined have made $286 Million dollars (B.O.G.), in addition to the millions of dollars the DVD release has made both 2, and the original, it's far from a flop.
Why do you people even bother particpating in these threads when you don't know what you're talking about? 😕
Originally posted by Cinemaddictionyea i no its no flop but look prolly even donnie darko made more money then that im not sure, but god knows shrek 2 did lol. anyway im just saying not a best series out there in sales.
The 2 movies combined have made $286 Million dollars (B.O.G.), in addition to the [b]millions of dollars the DVD release has made both 2, and the original, it's far from a flop.Why do you people even bother particpating in these threads when you don't know what you're talking about? 😕 [/B]
Originally posted by Vengeance
yea i no its no flop but look prolly even donnie darko made more money then that im not sure, but god knows shrek 2 did lol. anyway im just saying not a best series out there in sales.
No, you said it was a flop, and now your backpeddling. "Donnie Darko" in 2001, made $500,000 dollars. It was only in 50 theatres anyway, so bad example.
"Blade" has a very, very limited audience. To make $280 Million dollars make it the 3rd best selling comic movie franchise, behind "Spiderman" and "Batman".
Of course "Shrek" is going to do better, it's a family movie. Just another bad example.
Originally posted by Cinemaddictioni said blade did bad, i didn' say it was a f'ing flop so dont tell me i did. plus i no shrek is a bad example since it kicked alot of movies out of the way. but still just saying that blade sucked compaired to high ranked movies.
No, you said it was a flop, and now your backpeddling. "Donnie Darko" in 2001, made $500,000 dollars. It was only in 50 theatres anyway, so bad example."Blade" has a very, very limited audience. To make $280 Million dollars make it the 3rd best selling comic movie franchise, behind "Spiderman" and "Batman".
Of course "Shrek" is going to do better, it's a family movie. Just another bad example.
Originally posted by Cinemaddictionyea didn't make to many either so w/e. plus im not wrong i said it made little money and it did. so i would say your wrong since you dont know wtf im talking about. i never said it made the worst money ever in movie history so dont shit your self, i just said it didn't become a block buster k so dont freak out.
Flop, loser, what's the difference? The franchise didn't lose a single penny. You're just wrong, so admit it.
Right, lets settle this.
Look this up: Marvel characters
Blade has superhuman strength. The strength of a vampire.
He also has a healing factor, and vampire senses.
He is an expert melee fighter and uses bladed weapons and guns.
He is, therefore, almost like Wolverine, and considerring Wolverine is widely considerred a superhero, then so is Blade.
Look at the facts people.