All I ever said was that you and Stormy were on the same brainlength, given you're both usually pretty stubborn, don't like to listen to reason, and present opinion as fact.
Not once did I call anyone stupid, nor use the word. In addition, I never claimed to be right all of them. Take what I said however you want, I left it open to interpretation.
Originally posted by Cinemaddictionyour telling me that saying me and stormy had the same brainleanth is nothing like saying were stupid. i would really have to be stupid to have thought it ment anything else. and by even saying me and stormy not listening to reason i take it your just spilling another fact that your always right becuas eyour the only one that usally agrues with me.
All I ever said was that you and Stormy were on the same brainlength, given you're both usually pretty stubborn, don't like to listen to reason, and present opinion as fact.Not once did I call anyone stupid, nor use the word. In addition, I never claimed to be right all of them. Take what I said however you want, I left it open to interpretation.
I can't believe I missed this thread ! Look at all the ill tempered bitterness thats gone down without me....
Rather than going back over the points that baldnuts and his buddies have pointed out - let me say that I was a fan of blade from back when he was an afro sporting hipster in the Gene Colan styled comics.
If Gene had drawn him in a skintight yellow suit with a big "B" on the chest we wouldn't be having the conversation: the nay-sayers are confused because of the way blade dresses, not because of his abilities.
Appearing in a comicbook fighting badness and getting superpowers from being bitten by something weird - Blade or Spider-man? Doesnt matter both superheros as per the definition: Only the dress sense is different.
Originally posted by Mr Zerolol. u did miss alot of fighting. but still i just cant put my self to say that just becuase someone has powers makes them super hero, like batman has no powers but he is still a super hero. but say lets go past that, i dont realy feel like blade is being a hero by killing vamps even though its good he does i only out of a grudge against vamps for making him one to. he cares nothing about human kind or so he shows.
I can't believe I missed this thread ! Look at all the ill tempered bitterness thats gone down without me....Rather than going back over the points that baldnuts and his buddies have pointed out - let me say that I was a fan of blade from back when he was an afro sporting hipster in the Gene Colan styled comics.
If Gene had drawn him in a skintight yellow suit with a big "B" on the chest we wouldn't be having the conversation: the nay-sayers are confused because of the way blade dresses, not because of his abilities.
Appearing in a comicbook fighting badness and getting superpowers from being bitten by something weird - Blade or Spider-man? Doesnt matter both superheros as per the definition: Only the dress sense is different.
Originally posted by Major Knight
lol. u did miss alot of fighting. but still i just cant put my self to say that just becuase someone has powers makes them super hero, like batman has no powers but he is still a super hero. but say lets go past that, i dont realy feel like blade is being a hero by killing vamps even though its good he does i only out of a grudge against vamps for making him one to. he cares nothing about human kind or so he shows.
He's actually protecting the innocent.
He's fighting an unseen enemy.
Just because the hero doesn't fight some diabolical madman that threatens to blow up a country doesn't mean his fight is any less significant.
Without Blade, the vampires would be running roughshod all over the place. Several have tried to take over the world/become all powerful. Blade has stopped them. Just because people don't go "Look there goes Blade to save the day" doesn't mean he ain't a superhero.
For crying out loud, read my last post, he does at least as much superhero type things as the likes of Wolverine, yet because Wolverine is part of the X-Men and dresses in traditional looking superhero get-up, nobody has any qualms about calling him a superhero.
Blade = superhero.
Anybody that has given any arguemnet against that fact, has done so with their own opinion and without fact.
Originally posted by Red Superflyi also said he does kill vamps but it is not to protect crap, he does it to make him happy becuase he hates vamps and nothing more. i would say he did protect one girl in the first movie but thats about it. he has no intention of being a hero or helping plp, maybe he does but he doesn't show it. i just read an old comic i found of spider-man with blade in it. and all he wanted was to kill one vamp and he killed anything in his way to do so even innecent plp that knew nothing about the vamp.
He's actually protecting the innocent.He's fighting an unseen enemy.
Just because the hero doesn't fight some diabolical madman that threatens to blow up a country doesn't mean his fight is any less significant.
Without Blade, the vampires would be running roughshod all over the place. Several have tried to take over the world/become all powerful. Blade has stopped them. Just because people don't go "Look there goes Blade to save the day" doesn't mean he ain't a superhero.
For crying out loud, read my last post, he does at least as much superhero type things as the likes of Wolverine, yet because Wolverine is part of the X-Men and dresses in traditional looking superhero get-up, nobody has any qualms about calling him a superhero.
Blade = superhero.
Anybody that has given any arguemnet against that fact, has done so with their own opinion and without fact.
I would say that blade is'nt a super hero , I agree that he has certain
types of super human abllities , but I believe that he's a anti hero , he
does'nt fit the mainstream profile of a typical hero.
Blade's definitely not a zero, and I also believe the franchise has at least 1 or 2 more movies to offer !
Originally posted by prozuim88exactly how i feel, he is more of anti hero. normal real super hero's are all "save him save her" kinda stuff. which blade is nothing like. but i would dissagree with the movie thing, once you make a shitty shitty film like blade 2 u might find hard times to make a better one. but i do pray it will be good.
I would say that blade is'nt a super hero , I agree that he has certain
types of super human abllities , but I believe that he's a anti hero , he
does'nt fit the mainstream profile of a typical hero.Blade's definitely not a zero, and I also believe the franchise has at least 1 or 2 more movies to offer !
"Blade" had little to offer in the way of character development. That was all in "Blade 2".
The plot in "Blade 2" was that Blade was approached by the Bloodpack to join sides with them to be rid of the Reapers and Damaskino's clan.
However, The Bloodpack figured they'd get Blade killed, knock off the Reapers, and they'd be the ones left standing. Of course, that didn't happen, and the only one left was Blade.
Originally posted by SnakeEyesok i'll try to act as stupid as that.
i repeat and still agree with my previous statement