oh i know that. I just judge them from their actions. Their actions which make them to be ass-holes. The burning of American establishments,just because they dont agree with the war. Swastika's being drawn on the American flags at schools by teachers. I mean what is that shit. It is one thing to disagree with another countries actions, but totaly another to take on a holier than thou mentality when you take no stand in the situation other than, i dont want anything to do with it or the people involved. Also to out right openly bash the same country that irebuilt yours. that is crap.
Originally posted by pr1983
yes, am sure you right about the navy and airforce, but ragesremorse is right, u cannot say one nation because right now, if china and america went to war, there are a hell of a lot of countries with an axe to grind with america, and even the U.N., so im sure if the time came the other countries would give china all the resources they need, and assuming the americans landed on chinese soil, thats an awful big country, and if u remember a little place called vietnam, military might is meaningless in guerrilla warfare.
I know we're discussing the red dawn, and well beyond this post but i have to comment on the Vietname remark.
I DO remember a little place called Vietnam. And I assure you...it would be no Vietnam. Comparing a plane that drops Napalm on open jungle to GPS navigated Tomahawk missles is rediculous. Terror would rain down on that country from hundreds of miles away on a battleship, not walking thru the jungle.
If the war in Iraq showed the world anything...it showed how extremely lethal the upper echelon nations that use advanced weaponry can truly be. A little recon from GPS thermal readouts, and a barrage of bunker buster bombs...would decimate a countryside and any underground tunnels around.
To me....Iraq's streets are comparable to Vietnam's jungles.
Just like to point out a new issue...
In 1994 a ban on military-style assault weapons was made.
It was renewed by Clinton for extra wepons that made it past the loophole.
But now, Bush has not done anything about the ban expiring.
"The question is really this: Do we, as a nation, want to make it easier for terrorists to obtain such weapons?
Ask President Bush."
Assualt weapons are certainly important to keep off the streets and they in no way should be permitted... but then again an unregistered AK smuggled in and totally unexpected is far worse then a rifle that the police can expect... as long as they don't let hand grenades or C4 legally be sold i think we are ok 😂
Originally posted by RaventheOnly
Assualt weapons are certainly important to keep off the streets and they in no way should be permitted... but then again an unregistered AK smuggled in and totally unexpected is far worse then a rifle that the police can expect... as long as they don't let hand grenades or C4 legally be sold i think we are ok 😂
That the police can expect? 🤨 You do realize that just because someone has records of a man purchasing such a weapon means absolutely nothing when it comes to that person using it against other people, in criminal methods, other than locating the suspect? I'd rather piss off a thousand hunters than have twenty people killed then the culprit put behind bars.