DC Films Vs Marvel Films

Started by TheFilmProphet4 pages
Originally posted by §nakehead
Marvel is supiror to dc

Agreed

for how long.

Hey Batman 89 and Batman returns were great movies, and because of these movies, US Bat Fans can enjoy Batman TAS. If these Movies flop I dont think Batman TAS will come true.

Originally posted by Shadow_King
for how long.

Only the future success of DC's and Marvel's films can tell us that.

Originally posted by who?-kid
DC : The first Superman is still the best superhero movie ever in my opinion. But all the Batman movies where painful, to say the least. And I refuse to mention Catwoman.

Marvel : two great Spider-Man movies, two almost as great X-Men movies, one decent Punisher movie, one bad Hulk movie. O yeah, before I forget, a very average Daredevil movie. And the FF movie will probably suck too, I'm afraid.

Which Punisher movie are you talking about the first one the new remake? For me the first was better.

Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Agreed

yeap

Originally posted by Lenord
Which Punisher movie are you talking about the first one the new remake? For me the first was better.

The Punisher 2004 was at least a million times better than The Punisher 1990 version.

Well I think if they do it right they can make Alba look really great for the role. I just think she sucks as an actress.

100 million budget (F4 Maximum) isn't bad at all. 50 million of Hulk's 150 was Hulk himself. So it only took 100 to make that. Budget isn't much considering the actors.

-AC

5. Julian McMahon is playing Dr. Doom.

No, why couldn't they have Gary Oldman!

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Well I think if they do it right they can make Alba look really great for the role. I just think she sucks as an actress.

100 million budget (F4 Maximum) isn't bad at all. 50 million of Hulk's 150 was Hulk himself. So it only took 100 to make that. Budget isn't much considering the actors.

-AC

I do agree Alba is a terrible actress. It depends how many shots of the more expensive scenes they will shoot.

Shadow_King

for how long.

Forever. Or unless DC heroes can be as interesting and down to earth like Marvel ones. In the comicverse, you have to agree that Marvel has most the best characters around. The interesting world and character of each Marvel heroes is why Marvel is superior to DC in the comic realm.

This transcends to movies as well. The only reason those early Marvel movies sucked was because of low budgetting and poor special effects, unlike today where CGI's and stunt performances are far better than in the early days.

Originally posted by Beyonder
[b]Shadow_King

for how long.

Forever. Or unless DC heroes can be as interesting and down to earth like Marvel ones. In the comicverse, you have to agree that Marvel has most the best characters around. The interesting world and character of each Marvel heroes is why Marvel is superior to DC in the comic realm.

This transcends to movies as well. The only reason those early Marvel movies sucked was because of low budgetting and poor special effects, unlike today where CGI's and stunt performances are far better than in the early days. [/B]

The reason why Marvel movies were terrible back in the days was because Marvel was giving up rights to their characters left and right. Example The Punisher 1990, The Fantastic Four unreleased 1994, and the Captain America films. It wasn't until 1999 that Marvel realized what they had to do.

Source: www.filmrot.com

Jack Black has closed his deal. He will be playing Green Lantern in a film that has been described as a “zany comedy version a la THE MASK.” All rights to the DC comic have been worked out as well, so you can expect to start hearing more about this project in the months ahead. As I understand it, DC Comics tried desperately to dodge this bullet, but ultimately, they don’t have the right to veto something if Warner Bros. really wants to make it happen. This is the problem with the way DC’s deal with their corporate overlords is structured. Their hands are tied. As much as they are aware of the problem with this approach to the material, they just have to sit back and watch it happen along with fans of the character and the rich mythology that has been established over the long run of the various GREEN LANTERN titles.

Stephen Sommers Adapting Flash Gordon Source: Variety Thursday, August 5, 2004

"The Mummy", "The Mummy Returns", and "Van Helsing" writer/director Stephen Sommers and his producing partner Bob Ducsay have landed the rights to Flash Gordon, and will adapt a feature film based on the iconic comic book superhero for Universal, reports Variety. Sommers is producing the project and may write the film. He has yet to direct a project he hasn't scripted.

Flash Gordon dates back to 1934, when it was created by famed comic strip artist Alex Raymond, and for decades after appeared in movie serials, animated fare, TV shows and a 1980 feature helmed by Mike Hodges ("Croupier"😉.

DC FILMS CONFIRMED SO FAR:

Superman
Green Lanthern
Catwoman
Batman Begins
Flash Gordon

Dc take greater risks, but Marvel makes better execution

marvel movies are way better

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Dc take greater risks, but Marvel makes better execution

True. DC takes alot more risks for example just look at Catwoman.

Superman1 and batman2 were great because you couldn't fault the casting, direction and film score but the new crop of marvel movies that i've enjoyed in they're entirity as a viscral form of entertainment are even better as they're more fun and reach people who don't read comics but also appeal to those of us who are blessed too. god bless stan lee.

Originally posted by jayson
Superman1 and batman2 were great because you couldn't fault the casting, direction and film score but the new crop of marvel movies that i've enjoyed in they're entirity as a viscral form of entertainment are even better as they're more fun and reach people who don't read comics but also appeal to those of us who are blessed too. god bless stan lee.

Marvel films usually reach large amounts of people just look at the Spider-Man and X-Men franchises. Stan Lee is the ENTIRE reason why Marvel is where it is today.

Stan lee IS the man. What a visionary. when you think that the current crop of writers and artist struggle to produce one comic per month and he was maybe writing 6 you begin to understand the genius of the man.

With all due respect he didn't have to write as deep or thoughtful stories but I do agree with you.

He didn't even create some of the famous characters till he was in his 30s or something. By the time he was my age he was senior writer at Marvel, or editor. Something.

-AC