Originally posted by MERCILOUS
Batman doesn't need assassins to defend him. Makes a guy wonder.Your "lethal force" arguement works against you too. It is harder to take a guy down with non lethal force. Much much harder to take a guy down with fist than blades. This and your "runs a country" arguement both insist that Batman is the better fighter.
In addition, It is assumed that both people in a vs. thread will win at any means. Again, meaning that Batman is incalculably more dangerous than you assume.
I thought the vibranium only stopped metal? This would do nothing against Batman's punches. Feel free to correct me on this one.
His vibranium claws would never connect. A detail you have chosen to ignore even though you insist Batman is a better figher.
As for not comparing fair fights, I think it was you (although i'm not sure) who brought up BP beating Iron Man. And if we don't compare who've they've beat, how will we compare two different characters from two different universes? I'm open to suggestions on this one.
whether or not its harder, It says something about their character...just like u said GL had more of a warrior spirit than IW because he was willing to kill...well BP has more of a warrior spirit than Bats.
You dont know the properties of vibranium? I have to question your credibility since you dont seem to know much about Marvel...and its not vibranium claws...its antimetal claws...vibranium is what insulates his costume...if u want me to just ask, and I will inform you of vibranium's qualities...and BP has only encorporated the antimetal claws relatively recently...he has one the vast majority of his fights without, but they r a hell of an upgrade...
I brought up Iron Man...I was demonstrating BP's fighting style and superior agility and speed...however, saying BP can beat Bats because he beat Iron Man, would not be a good argument, I agree.
I see a pattern of you supporting DC guys over marvel guys and talking on and on about the DC guys with nothing to say about MArvel...why is this?