Batman vs Spiderman

Started by brainchild81343 pages

Was Wolvie trying to hurt him?

He just went and grab him. But Parker's confusions of his Spider sense says somethings of that incident

Originally posted by joesha28
I'm not a fanboy. I'm do a analysis (or whatever crap is that ). I;m not givin it to Batman neither Spidey. I don't write off the contestants. If it a big enviroment it might be Batman, enclosed area Spiderman. Batman has to stop Spidey from moving fast. Spidey has to finish Bats fast from using his gadgets.

Who keeps saying you're a fanboy. You're far too reasonable for one.......

I've read quite a few good posts on this thread....most of them were from Mister......and the way i see...in this battle the result would be fifty, fifty.....Fifty percent chance that Spidey would kick Bats ass, and Fifty percent chance that Bats would get beat down by spidey 😄

so thats your conclusion now?

Yep....from page 31 of this thread...most compelling argument

cool

Originally posted by havok801125
I've read quite a few good posts on this thread....most of them were from Mister......and the way i see...in this battle the result would be fifty, fifty.....Fifty percent chance that Spidey would kick Bats ass, and Fifty percent chance that Bats would get beat down by spidey 😄

I appreciate your compliment man. 😮‍💨

don't flatter the MISTER

Originally posted by brainchild81
To be honest the poll is great and I'm glad more people voted the right way🙂, but it doesn't really prove anything. If Batman was winning for some crazy reason, I doubt you or I or anyone with a brain would accept that as proof. Believe me, I've seen polls where Bats wins. WTF!?

Wow, stop it right there.

I never said it was proof, not in the least.

I just said his comparisons sucked ;-.

you know people who have no more arguments post on things irrelevant, lol.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
you know people who have no more arguments post on things irrelevant, lol.

😉

batman wins with prep time

otherwise spidey wins

spidey has come up with prep time solutions as well, he's more of the scientific mind, whileas, bats is more detective like.

A detective mind and scientific. bat's that is

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
don't flatter the MISTER
😆

All this talk of Batman being able to hit harder than Spider-Man got me interested, so I dug back through...

Batman does not hit harder than Spider-Man. He does, however, hit more effectively (which was already stated by several people) and knows how to take a shot better.

Despite what people may think, Spider-Man does not punch with 10 tons (20,000 lbs) of force. Peter can bench 10 tons, which is mostly the chest muscle group at work. When we eliminate the use of his chest muscles and limit it to one arm's shoulder and elbow manipulators (these are the biceps and triceps), the force at which he throws a single punch is significantly lower. Take into account the fact that Spidey really doesn't know any technique, it gets even worse.

There was talk about punching a bone and why Spider-Man doesn't break them. It's because he doesn't know how. If you hold out your arm and punch it, what happens? Your arm swings and the impact is lessened. If someone punches you in the chest and focuses on hitting the chest, not through the chest, what happens? You bounce backwards and it doesn't hurt quite as much as if he had you pinned against a wall. This is what's happening as Spider-Man is punching someone, and though it hurts, it's simply his brute force doing it. Now we take into account the fact that Batman is a highly trained hand-to-hand combatant, who is more than capable of rolling with a strike possessed of a ballistic armor suit (it taking a shot from Superman is still completely ridiculous and I believe that one or a handful of shots from Spider-Man would shatter the armor), and Spider-Man's apparent strength advantage is significantly lessened.

On the other hand, we have Batman, who knows where to hit and how to hit it. Spider-Man's body is augmented so that it can take more punishment, but at least eventually, he'd take severe damage.

Of course, if Spidey gets a hold of Batman and manages to throw him, the Bat is in a load of trouble.

spidey has come up with prep time solutions as well, he's more of the scientific mind, whileas, bats is more detective like.

Spider-Man's strategies are usually simple, but effective, ones unless they deal with what he knows best: science. If a strategy employs a scientific fact or whatever, such as electro's electricity being affected by water, then he's good at it; he's book-smart. That, however, isn't entirely what I call tactical know-how, which is what Batman has.

Spidey's best strategy is trickery, and that's more acting ability and creativity than anything else.

Originally posted by Wanderer259
All this talk of Batman being able to hit harder than Spider-Man got me interested, so I dug back through...

Batman does not hit harder than Spider-Man. He does, however, hit more effectively (which was already stated by several people) and knows how to take a shot better.

Despite what people may think, Spider-Man does not punch with 10 tons (20,000 lbs) of force. Peter can bench 10 tons, which is mostly the chest muscle group at work. When we eliminate the use of his chest muscles and limit it to one arm's shoulder and elbow manipulators (these are the biceps and triceps), the force at which he throws a single punch is significantly lower. Take into account the fact that Spidey really doesn't know any technique, it gets even worse.

There was talk about punching a bone and why Spider-Man doesn't break them. It's because he doesn't know how. If you hold out your arm and punch it, what happens? Your arm swings and the impact is lessened. If someone punches you in the chest and focuses on hitting the chest, not through the chest, what happens? You bounce backwards and it doesn't hurt quite as much as if he had you pinned against a wall. This is what's happening as Spider-Man is punching someone, and though it hurts, it's simply his brute force doing it. Now we take into account the fact that Batman is a highly trained hand-to-hand combatant, who is more than capable of rolling with a strike possessed of a ballistic armor suit (it taking a shot from Superman is still completely ridiculous and I believe that one or a handful of shots from Spider-Man would shatter the armor), and Spider-Man's apparent strength advantage is significantly lessened.

On the other hand, we have Batman, who knows where to hit and how to hit it. Spider-Man's body is augmented so that it can take more punishment, but at least eventually, he'd take severe damage.

Of course, if Spidey gets a hold of Batman and manages to throw him, the Bat is in a load of trouble.

true he doesn't hit at ten tons, but he has superhuman velocity and speed, he doesn't stand still and punch, he uses web kicks,and other high velocity moves. magnificent post, you put work into it.

true he doesn't hit at ten tons, but he has superhuman velocity and speed, he doesn't stand still and punch, he uses web kicks,and other high velocity moves. magnificent post, you put work into it.

True, but if Spider-Man keeps trying to gain momentum and speed to attack with, Batman will anticipate, see it coming, and evade as need be. I think Spider-Man's best bet would be wrestling, where brute strength really becomes the best thing to have. If he can just grab Bruce a lot, he'll win; Batman won't be able to use his gadgets and his technique will be useless.