Batman vs Spiderman

Originally posted by havok801125
Damn man...give it up already......don't start this shit up again.....cos then somebody is gonna say your'e wrong and that spiderman wins....yada yada yada...and the same whole argument is gonna start up again........anyway according to the poll (and popular opinion) spiderman wins....so accept it and get over it...and quit this shit

You guys keep bring this back up.....why???

Anyways onless spiderman starts throwing punches harder than superman.....BATMAN wins...more times than not....🙂

I think all the versus forums are a matter of opinion and no one can say who will win what fight as a fact. I'm sure others have stated this. Also Batman is my hero, but I say Spidey has this because Batman doesn't have any actually super power. Plus Spider-Man has a lot more agility having the power of a spider and all.

My dad once told me that speed is power. Which I find to be very true.

Originally posted by CobbleR
I think all the versus forums are a matter of opinion and no one can say who will win what fight as a fact. I'm sure others have stated this. Also Batman is my hero, but I say Spidey has this because Batman doesn't have any actually super power. Plus Spider-Man has a lot more agility having the power of a spider and all.

My dad once told me that speed is power. Which I find to be very true.

So in your opinion, Batman wins because he doesn't have any super powers? So then maybe you can explain to me how batman beats people like Man-bat, Killer croc, all 5 clayfaces, Blockbuster, Solomun Grundy and the likes?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot

Stop trolling, that was a valid question.

He stated this is all a matter of opinion, and he stated his opinion. Yet you question his opinion.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
He stated this is all a matter of opinion, and he stated his opinion. Yet you question his opinion.

Oh I see so I'm not suppose to question opinions in an arguement.

This isn't actually and arguement unless you make it one. The versus forums are all a matter of opinion. It's all based on who you think will win. I think Spider-man because Batman has no pwers and Spider-man does end of my opinion. It's people like who take these forums too seriously and try to force people to think what you think.

Originally posted by CobbleR
This isn't actually and arguement unless you make it one. The versus forums are all a matter of opinion. It's all based on who you think will win. I think Spider-man because Batman has no pwers and Spider-man does end of my opinion. It's people like who take these forums too seriously and try to force people to think what you think.

Don't be foolish, of course it's not an arguement, I'm trying to make it one. Not because I want to get under you skin but because I enjoy a good arguement. And I'll continue, it's not all based on who you think will win, "I think Punisher can beat Superman" is an opinion, it doesn't make it a good one. No one's trying to force you to do anything, If you saw my attempt at trying to get you to use a different perspective as agressive, good. Then maybe you'd reply and I could have an enjoyable arguement. It's a shame you've decided to debate my tactics instead of my arguement, are you sure it is I who is taking this personally?

I said too seriously not personally. Those are two different words with different meanings and yes I'm sure. Also the point of arguing is to get someone to take your side. Which in a point of view is forcing someone to believe what you want them to.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot

What happened x, you use to debate stuff. I guess you have more fun posting pics of your troll collection.

Originally posted by CobbleR
I said too seriously not personally. Those are two different words with different meanings and yes I'm sure. Also the point of arguing is to get someone to take your side. Which in a point of view is forcing someone to believe what you want them to.

So what's the problem? Quit debating tactics and answer the original question. And if in doing so your opinion hasn't changed I'd like a reason why and another try. What's so hard to follow here?

Originally posted by MERCILOUS
What happened x, you use to debate stuff. I guess you have more fun posting pics of your troll collection.

My opinion hasn't changed and I still feel Spider-man would beat Batman. As I stated in my first post in this thread speed is power and Spider-man is very fast.

Originally posted by CobbleR
My opinion hasn't changed and I still feel Spider-man would beat Batman. As I stated in my first post in this thread speed is power and Spider-man is very fast.

Well that still doesn't answer my question. Spiderman is very fast, but no so fast that he is wholy above the speed of characters like Batman. Spiderman is indeed very strong, but not stronger than other opponents batman has defeated. On the other hand Batman is similar to characters who give Spiderman trouble or have defeated him.

Spider-man is also stronger than an average human. Which is what Batman is if you have forgotten.

Originally posted by CobbleR
Spider-man is also stronger than an average human. Which is what Batman is if you have forgotten.

Just to warn you "average" isn't a good term to use around here when describing characters like Batman. Spiderman is currently in the fifteen ton range, I know this well, but it does nothing to change my opinion. Strength is only one factor in this fight. Solomun Grundy is many times stronger and durable then Spiderman, and yet Batman beat him with punches and kicks.

This is very true. I will also heed your warning about using the term average. What I'm not sure of is did Spider-man fight someone like Grundy? If not then you are using him as a bad example. Batman has no powers. His gadgets are kick ass but I doubt any of them will be any use to him when fighting Spider-man who really incorperates jumping in his fighting style.