Batman vs Spiderman

Started by StrawNilla343 pages

Originally posted by Creshosk
Batman is closer to existing than spiderman would be technically.

But Batman DOES NOT EXIST. He doesn't exist technically, figuratively, or even kind of. And neither does Spidey.

And real world physics applied to the abilities of both characters should make sense, though I doubt you would find it so seeing as you would either have to admit Spidey being Batman's superior in every physical area many times over, leave the thread, or continue your argument of Bats beating Spidey w/o prep time and risk being mocked and taunted.

Originally posted by The MISTER
I noticed that you appreciate real world logic as well and I believe that it's supposed to exist in fiction as well as non-fiction in almost every instance except cartoons. Even the Sci-fi world has explanations that are rooted in realistic but fictional logic.

kryptonite doesn't exist now but it could in the future...and many other fictional events could become non-fiction as well...If you push your imagination a little...

Even a simple car would be a fantastical nonsense story explained to someone 1000 years ago... 😮‍💨


Exactly.

Originally posted by StrawNilla
But Batman DOES NOT EXIST. He doesn't exist technically, figuratively, or even kind of. And neither does Spidey.

And real world physics applied to the abilities of both characters should make sense, though I doubt you would find it so seeing as you would either have to admit Spidey being Batman's superior in every physical area many times over, leave the thread, or continue your argument of Bats beating Spidey w/o prep time and risk being mocked and taunted.

Good post!

Originally posted by brainchild81
Good post!

I try.

Originally posted by who?-kid
It's only logical when the guy and his opponent are more or less on the same level.

Spider-Man however outclasses Batman in every physical way, has just like the Bats tons of experience, has a spider-sense that in most cases works just fine and is a genius in his own way.

Is it not logical I vote for Spider-Man

Yes it is logical to vote for spiderman why because he is the one with the powers. Put them together without stating their stats and people are going to with batman because he is bigger. Now put their stats and show that spiderman has the power and batman does not have any powers and people are going to with spiderman both scenarios are logical....right..... But there is a reason why the person without powers is here in the first place.The reason.... the person fights people as strong as spiderman, faster than spiderman (i.e. the human flea) and as a track record on the incredible as far as the eye can see (doing superhuman fits). And what makes his fits even incredible he has no superpowers.

Going with the person with powers is logical... but it is not entirely logical (or correct) because there is also a logical reason why the person without powers is here in the first place. You dig. If not I will gladly explain some more.

Originally posted by Zahit
Now can you imagine if that was a punch from Spiderman?
I know Batman wasn't ready for that one.
In a fight he will be ready for anything, but if Hal Jordan
is capable of knocking Batman down with a punch...........
....what do you think a 15 ton lifter who's super-fast would do?

Yes I can imagine but I don't think in an actual fight there is going to be any sucker punches. Especially when your opponent is batman.

Yes I can imagine but I don't think in an actual fight there is going to be any sucker punches. Especially when your opponent is batman. [/B][/QUOTE]

Even if Batman somehow pulled out that miracle gadget, Spidey will overwhelm Bats until He HAS to think on his feet, which is Spideys Strongpoint. Besides, as was stated earlier, Bats is becoming too powerful and is almost never hit anyways.

Did you not see the post by Zahit. And thinking is where batman gets his power, spiderman is not as strong in this depart when your opponent best weapon is that brain of his.

We know Bats best weapon is his brain. But when he goes against more powerful opponents without easily exploitable weaknesses (Deathstroke owns him) he loses.

Yeah...the last I checked Deathstroke had nothing on batman.

You sure about that?

would not be saying if I did not think so

*Even if Batman somehow pulled out that miracle gadget, Spidey will overwhelm Bats until He HAS to think on his feet, which is Spideys Strongpoint. Besides, as was stated earlier, Bats is becoming too powerful and is almost never hit anyways.*

So Bats thinks on his feet and wins.

hmmmm guess they missed the one where batman practically buttraped green lantern and gave him the smack down.....

Originally posted by lifeisaglich
Yeah...the last I checked Deathstroke had nothing on batman.

What doesn't he have on Batman?
Hell, he stole Batman's suit and was batter at being batman than batman.
Get outta here.

Originally posted by jinzin
hmmmm guess they missed the one where batman practically buttraped green lantern and gave him the smack down.....

holy crap, what issue is that!?

ummmm I don't remember I scanned this a lonnnnng time ago for a joke on another forum......I don't even remember what issue it's from.....I'll check though......someday....I still gotta get those man mountain marko pics up though....

Here's some real world logic for you, BATMAN HITS HARDER THAN SPIDER MAN. "Real World" fighters have shown to hit there opponents with devastating effect. Mirko Crocop kicks Heath Herring and crushes his side breaking several ribs and bruising organs. Julio Cesar Chaves leaves that one black guy who use to be champ severely brain damaged while wearing 12 ounce gloves. Tank Abbot crushes opponents face (several fractures to face.) MMA fight Muay Thai trained fighter breaks opponents leg in half (opponent was blocking.)

Spiderman has done nothing like this to the street level opponents he's faced even while trying to severely injure or kill.

Batman injures opponents, seemingly at will.

BATMAN HITS HARDER THAN SPIDERMAN!!!

just given the fact that this is an in character battle, spidey will be holding back regardless of the fact that he can't KO or kill bats so easily as all that even IF he was going all out, batman cheats, and will do whatever it takes to come out on top.........regardless of physical attributes batman's got the winning cards here...not spidey....

Strongest punch ever recorded was nearly 4 tons, that's HUGE....but a jab from Spidey should be around that ammount.

An all out punch should be twice that......more if Spidey was a fighter, but he isn't.

Batman doesn't punch harder than Spidey, he punches more effectively....which is what really matters.

Spidey's hardest punch has WAY more potential to be effective than Batman's hardest punch.