Villain For Spider-Man 3?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Haha nearly done.

You were done about three pages back.I kept this up because it's the most fun I've had in this thread in ages 😄

Now I'll reply to the "relevant"

So prove it. You made a claim you cannot prove. I'm sitting here, not seeing proof.

Are you incapable of reading??? Or just ignorant?? Maybe both.

You can't produce what is long gone.

Get that thru your head and move on.There's a good lad.

Well you are of the opinion that people shouldn't say things for sure without proof. You spoke specifically of your distastes for those kind of people. You are now doing the same.

I bet your school teachers loved you,assuming you went to school that is.How many times did they have to say 1+1=2 before it sunk in???

You CAN'T prove what is long gone.However any so called facts about a current blockbuster movie in the making should be readily availible.

It is not unreasonable to ask for proof of these facts when someone struts in here and declares something as a cold hard fact.

Now if your only response to this is your blah blah blah show me proof of rumours from SM-2 again.Then save it.

I don't genuinely think you know anything, much less all.

And once again pointing out the obvious.I bet you stop in the middle of the street and shout "Look everyone.The sky is blue"

I never EVER said I know everything.I'm flattered you get that impression off me though.

I'm trying to discover what your flawed rationale and logic is.

Quit while you're not ahead kiddo.Every one step forward,you're taking two steps back.

Yeah, stupid isn't it?

What you just said??? Darn right.

Then you should have said "I recall this being the statistic, but I can't prove it."

No the way I said it is just fine.Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that ancient rumours from movies long since released,are deleted from websites.

I've found magazine articles on the net from the 70s. If things exist on the net from decades when the net wasn't even existing, Spider-Man rumours are around. Find them or admit you cannot prove it.

Were these magazine articles about movie rumours??? If so prove it.Since you are able to find them.Let's see them.

Well until you admit you can't prove your stat, you are a hypocrite.

Just by your definition.Which is worth less than nothing to me 😄

http://pakavenue.com/webdigest/art_and_entertainment/movie_018.htm

There we go.A website that reports Ock and Lizard in SM-2 thanks to Dunst's bull s***

That was mega hard to find.Now I'll try and track one down where Dunst says Lizard is a villain with Ock.

Hope this is to your liking Mr Centauri 😉

http://www.comics2film.com/ProjectFrame.php?f_id=187&f_page=4

Bottom article,where it says Dunst says Sandman and Venom are the SM-3 villains.

Then it says Dunst said before Black Cat and Lizard are the villains.

See how her BS spreads all over the place??? Much like it is now with the Venom stuff.

All the websites lap up her rubbish.

http://www.geocities.com/famousflix/spiderman2

Oh look,another website that Lizard was in there with Ock.

You know Centauri I stand corrected on that one point you made.Some rumours are still around.

Was that so hard? Laziness is a bad thing. I didn't need confirmation that they were still around, I knew they were. You still haven't answered my question or provided proof.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
You were done about three pages back.I kept this up because it's the most fun I've had in this thread in ages 😄

Now I'll reply to the "relevant"

I was done, true. Not because of you, but because I proved my point three pages back. The most cliched debate tactic is to say "You were done". Venture into the OTF or Philosophy forums sometime and see how poor of a debator you actually are. Staying in this one forum replying every second to idiots doesn't make you a good debator.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Are you incapable of reading??? Or just ignorant?? Maybe both.

You can't produce what is long gone.

Get that thru your head and move on.There's a good lad.

Haha, you should be feeling quite stupid right now.

Moreover, are you forgetting the issue? I never asked for proof that she said it or that there were rumours.

You: "99.99% of them are all irrelevant to the movies or wrong." Well? You can't quote a statistic and then not prove it. I want proof that 99.99% of all Spider-Man rumours are fake.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
I bet your school teachers loved you,assuming you went to school that is.How many times did they have to say 1+1=2 before it sunk in???

You CAN'T prove what is long gone.However any so called facts about a current blockbuster movie in the making should be readily availible.

It is not unreasonable to ask for proof of these facts when someone struts in here and declares something as a cold hard fact.

Now if your only response to this is your blah blah blah show me proof of rumours from SM-2 again.Then save it.

Hahaha, only to go and make a little effort and find 3 links that describe the rumours in depth. I warned you not to dive in and assume things boy. I'm losing count of the hypocritical mistakes you keep making.

Missing the point also, I didn't ask for proof she said it. I said for proof that 99.99% of all Spider-Man rumours and/or rumour sources are fake and irrelevant. Can you do that? If the answer is no, then I expect your next reply to hold a passage that says "I shouldn't exaggerate or exaggerate statistics if they A) Do not exist and B) To prove a fake point."

Originally posted by Doc Ock
And once again pointing out the obvious.I bet you stop in the middle of the street and shout "Look everyone.The sky is blue"

I don't think there's a closet on Earth that would be able to hold you, man. Don't act oblivious to the point that I have to point out the obvious to you and then moan about it.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
I never EVER said I know everything.I'm flattered you get that impression off me though.

I don't. I just get the impression that you think you're a quality bearer of opinion and knowledge here, which you have said you do. You're not.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Quit while you're not ahead kiddo.Every one step forward,you're taking two steps back.

Haha, the end is nigh clearly. You're resorting to the old "Reply to anything so I can make up a post" tactic.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
What you just said??? Darn right.

No, because that's what you're essentially doing. Kirsten said something untrue. Believing her wasn't unreasonable, blaming her for you believing her is. If you didn't dive in and waited for confirmation, you wouldn't have got burned. Confirm this or deny this?

Originally posted by Doc Ock
No the way I said it is just fine.Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows that ancient rumours from movies long since released,are deleted from websites.

Hahaha, yeah. They are aren't they. Oh, by the way...someone posting under your name just threw me lots of links with rumours but I bet they're lying and fake.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Were these magazine articles about movie rumours??? If so prove it.Since you are able to find them.Let's see them.

No they were interviews. The point remains the same, articles relevant or not, don't just fade off the net. As I knew, as you denied and have since conceded to being wrong in.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Just by your definition.Which is worth less than nothing to me 😄

Not just my definition, THE definition:

hypocrite:

n : a person who professes beliefs and opinions that he does not hold.

You believe people shouldn't come in and say something for definite if they cannot prove it.

So what's up with your 99.99% statistic? Best show it or else you'll look even more stupid.

-AC

Ok let me sum all this up in a final post to you.You're starting to bore me now because you keep saying the same thing again and again.

I have proven that Dunst is a bull sh1tter.I have proven random websites sport nothing but crap.Crap usually spread by Dunst and her stupidness.

Much like what is happening now.

So I say again,Anyone who comes in here shouting we're definitely getting Venom,I shall challenge them to proof of this.And if they have none,or if it's from any website other than the Sony website,then I shall diss them in a grand and glorious fashion.

If you merely "think" we're getting Venom or whoever.That's fine.Your opinion.But try and state it as a fact with no solid proof.Then I'll shred the statement to pieces.

That's that 😄

Mr "Know it all" has spoken 😉

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri

So what's up with your 99.99% statistic? Best show it or else you'll look even more stupid.

Oh let me address this bit.

I've just shown several sites saying the same crap about Lizard in SM-2.They were wrong,wrong,wrong.

In fact I couldn't find any sites that said Ock was the only villain,except for those who knew it for fact after it was officially announced,and Dunst's BS was thrown on the trash pile.

So there's my statistic.Practically every time they're 99.99% wrong or 100% wrong.

Much like you are with me.

Bye now 😄

Oh and I just had to reply to this bit,as I forgot to earlier,and I just feel like being mean here 😈

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri

Secondly, it depends who. A hollywood actress? Haha, no. I have a life.

Coming from a guy with nearly 17'000 posts on an internet message board,who just joined last year,I find that hilariously funny 😆

You must do alot of this,you know strut in here and try to "expose" people.I emphasise the word TRY 😄

Great life you have there LMAO!

Bye now 😄

Haha, "mean". Yes, how horrible you were to refer to "Internet Cheap Ways Out 101". Haha, funny. If you visit KMC just once a day and post many times in various forums, you rack up post count. Time/Post has no corrolation. At least I'm discussing worthwhile subjects in other forums rather than purposefully waiting on the Spider-Man forum to gain "thrill" from "shredding" idiots.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
I have proven that Dunst is a bull sh1tter.I have proven random websites sport nothing but crap.Crap usually spread by Dunst and her stupidness.

Much like what is happening now.

I didn't ask you to prove Dunst was a bullsh*tter or that 3 random websites spout crap. You're cowardly avoiding backing up your claim.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
So I say again,Anyone who comes in here shouting we're definitely getting Venom,I shall challenge them to proof of this.And if they have none,or if it's from any website other than the Sony website,then I shall diss them in a grand and glorious fashion.

Exactly. I agree that people shouldn't make claims for sure that they can't back up. Like what you are doing now.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
If you merely "think" we're getting Venom or whoever.That's fine.Your opinion.But try and state it as a fact with no solid proof.Then I'll shred the statement to pieces.

You stated something as a fact with no solid proof though. Now you're running the opposite direction trying to escape that.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
That's that 😄

Mr "Know it all" has spoken 😉

Not yet.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
Oh let me address this bit.

I've just shown several sites saying the same crap about Lizard in SM-2.They were wrong,wrong,wrong.

In fact I couldn't find any sites that said Ock was the only villain,except for those who knew it for fact after it was officially announced,and Dunst's BS was thrown on the trash pile.

So there's my statistic.Practically every time they're 99.99% wrong or 100% wrong.

Much like you are with me.

Hahaha, clearly you have no understanding of percentages. You showed me three links displaying a few false rumours each.

This does not prove that 99.99% of all Spider-Man (1 or 2) movie rumours are fake. To claim that 100% of them have been fake would mean that no rumour regarding the movies has ever been correct. I think we know this is false, so there you go again.

Prove to me that 99.99% of all Spider-Man 1 and 2 movie rumours, ever, are fake. Prove it. You are quoting, what I call "look good" stats. They're not real, but they look good.

So again, unless you can prove this, factually, then you are a hypocrite.

You: "So there's my statistic.Practically every time they're 99.99% wrong or 100% wrong"

You're bailing out because you don't like the fact that you posted first and thought second. I'm not one of the idiots who will see the big numbers and be impressed, I expect proof. As you always do.

So I'll be waiting on it.

Incase I lost you there and/or to save you replying to it quote for quote, here's the crux of that last reply:

Can you prove to me that every Spider-Man movie rumour ever (100%) or nearly every one ever (99.99%) has been wrong?

Yes or no? Not "It said on..." no. Can you do this, yes or no?

-AC

well you can debate all you want me i'm gonna wait
til sony say who topher is playing

I'm not too bothered to be honest, as long as whoever plays him can act the part and they make it look like Venom. Not Spider-Man in black.

We're no longer debating, I've proven my point. The only closure I'm waiting on is Doc Ock's ability to factually prove those statistics correct or admit that he was exaggerating.

Because you can't tell people not to say things for definite if they're not true, only to go do it.

-AC

Originally posted by miroku
well you can debate all you want me i'm gonna wait
til sony say who topher is playing

Good for you miroku 😉

Who would you like him to be??

The fact remains that in one way or another, he knows who he is playing.

jeez, everything was fine before Alpha centauri showed up.

oh im gonna answer that question too. I want Topher to play Mysterio. Its the only villain i can actually see him play. Am i right?
-my old idea was he couldve been pre-radiated mac gargan LOL then when he's scorpion thomas hayden church would take over as the bumped scorpion LOL. Other than that i cant see topher play any villain. He'd do an alright peter parker though

Originally posted by Silverstein

oh im gonna answer that question too. I want Topher to play Mysterio. Its the only villain i can actually see him play. Am i right?

What about Electro??.He's young enough for Electro IMO.

Although I love Mysterio too.

Originally posted by Doc Ock
What about Electro??.He's young enough for Electro IMO.

Although I love Mysterio too.

topher just doesnt have the face of a villain. He has the face of a little kid. A villain is supposed to look like a villain. See if Topher is Mysterio he would be covered by the bowl 🙂

So have you all more or less decided that Topher Grace would be horrible as Eddie Brock? Because let's remember, he won't be Venom. Venom (hopefully) will be CGI when he's transformed.

Why don't you wait and see if he turns in a good role before writing him off.

Sam Raimi's most notable movie before Spider-Man was The Gift. Possibly the crappest movie there is.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri

Sam Raimi's most notable movie before Spider-Man was The Gift. Possibly the crappest movie there is.

-AC

Evil Dead.

Topher actually looks a lot like Tobey.

i dont think he looks like Tobey.

Originally posted by Silverstein
i dont think he looks like Tobey.

It's a free country.