Originally posted by DarkDethbringer
Kirstan Dunst has said that Venom and Sandman will for sure be in it, where is teh official SpiderMan 3 trhead? someone said that he posted a picture showing Hobgoblin behind Mary Jane at the end of SM2 unless eh posted it her aiI want to see it
Originally posted by Tekno Boy
Shut Up! Tobey is a very good actor. 😒
You shut up. It has absolutely nothing to do with Tobey Maguire. It has to do with the script and the director. Tobey is perfectly capable of playing the role of Spider-Man properly, just like Alfred Molina is more than perfectly capable of playing Dr. Octopus properly, but both were given sub-par scripts and sub-par direction.
Alright some people took what I said in different ways from what it was intended to be.
I thought it was implied just out of movie knowledge that a 5 hour film would have an intermission, first off...not 5 hours straight of sitting in a theatre seat.
LOTR was boring because of Jackson. Look at how King Kong is doing because of its length - he doesn't edit for story and content, he just keeps a lot of things in and goes "its unnecessary...but...eh, I shot it right?"
Some of you think that I meant a 5 hour Spider-Man film like the ones we've been having, just longer. Good lord no. I would not be able to sit through that long full of whining and whatnot. I'm talking about a 5 hour Spider-Man film that has several villains in it and is an epic story. Think about a film that can successfully introduce the whole Venom origin (with the symbiote and all of that), plus have some emotional stuff going on, and some minor villains like Shocker and Rhino. First two and a half hours focus on the symbiote (with Peter facing Shocker and Rhino to show off his augmented powers), plus some Harry stuff and some MJ crap. Then there's the church scene, and he gets rid of the symbiote, and we have intermission. We come back from intermission and Venom is the focus, with some GOOD emotional stuff (like Brock tormenting Parker through Mary Jane and Aunt May). Finally ends with Brock being sent to Ravencroft, where in the cell next to him is a freakshow of a person...you guessed it, good old CK.
Carnage obviously won't be in this film, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have a shot at being in future ones (if they make them). He is after all a fan favorite and a large character in the Spider-Man saga.
Casting-wise...I'd say Brad Pitt or Sean William Scott would be a good choice - either them or Jake Busey (if he lost weight).
Sean Williams Scott would make a good Deadpool, but if you want a good Carnage, you need someone insane with a cool laugh. If he were younger, I'd say Ralph Fiennes. As for Venom, I think Topher could do it, but I think that maybe Scott Speedman could have done it. If he beefed up a little more, he'd look like Brock with long hair. Ah, for Carnage, Steve Zahn could do it if he got a lesson in intensity and crazy.
Originally posted by Marcus4600
Sean Williams Scott would make a good Deadpool, but if you want a good Carnage, you need someone insane with a cool laugh. If he were younger, I'd say Ralph Fiennes. As for Venom, I think Topher could do it, but I think that maybe Scott Speedman could have done it. If he beefed up a little more, he'd look like Brock with long hair. Ah, for Carnage, Steve Zahn could do it if he got a lesson in intensity and crazy.
Fiennes is a great actor, but idk if I see him as Carnage.
Speedman, yeah I have to agree with you, he does look a lot like Brock and would be a better choice (if bulked up of course).
Zahn...hm, maybe. Never thought about him. http://www.hotflick.net/flicks/2001_Joy_Ride/Thumb/001JRD_Steve_Zahn_007.jpg
