Homosexuality: Chosen or Genetic?

😂

Originally posted by Robtard
Shouldn't semicolon be one word?

perhaps he refers to the anatomical part ; i could be wrong

THat could be painful.

Well, homosexuality, colon, pain......yadda yadda yadda

Yaddle?

Originally posted by queeq
What's your point, Kram3r?

My point is that I didn't feel your previous answers addressed my phrasing, which, would have made those answers different. Also, you say you didn't dodge, however look at this beauty of an example:

Originally posted by Kram3r
Oi, don't dodge my post.

And your question is stupid. A 5 year old hasn't entered puberty and hence has no sexual attraction towards any gender. That's just science.

Originally posted by queeq
I wasn't dodging your point, I made mine quite a few posts back and was elaborating on it. Obviously you didn't read all of it.

Here you merely address the fact that I asked you not to dodge and not my comments regarding your question about 5 year old's sexuality.

Originally posted by GCG
Yes ; I know i'm right. Thx

text /tɛkst/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[tekst] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. the main body of matter in a manuscript, book, newspaper, etc., as distinguished from notes, appendixes, headings, illustrations,

Originally posted by Kram3r
You are wrong.

Oh yeah; good old times.

Originally posted by GCG
Well, homosexuality, colon, pain......yadda yadda yadda

You're doing something wrong then, amateur.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're doing something wrong then, amateur.

You mean virgin?

Originally posted by GCG
You mean virgin?

That's a double edged "pwnt" right there young man.

Originally posted by Kram3r
Here you merely address the fact that I asked you not to dodge and not my comments regarding your question about 5 year old's sexuality.

So, you admit I was not ignoring you and that your accusation about that was false? Sounds like it.

And since you are so uptight about having your questions answered, I might as well ask you why you didn't answer my question about you having read everything that went on before you posed your first question, which included an offensive remark? Did you read it or not?

Because all that would have answered all your questions. I referred to my previous posts several times and right after your initial remark. What is your problem?

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a double edged "pwnt" right there young man.

You mean "young virgin man" ?

Originally posted by GCG
You mean "young virgin man" ?

You have NO excuse to be a virgin....there is always rape and you know it!!! 😠

I raped my hand....................does that count?

Originally posted by GCG
I raped my hand....................does that count?

No...you have to sit on your hand until it goes numb and THEN rape your hand...it's called the "stranger".

Originally posted by Robtard
Shouldn't semicolon be one word?

The KMC has enough grammar-idiots, it doesn't need another, just because you're slighty older and have slightly better communication skills now.

Originally posted by queeq
So, you admit I was not ignoring you and that your accusation about that was false? Sounds like it.

What? No. You did ignore me. You ignored the most important part of that post. I just showed you, are you blind?

Originally posted by queeq
And since you are so uptight about having your questions answered, I might as well ask you why you didn't answer my question about you having read everything that went on before you posed your first question, which included an offensive remark? Did you read it or not?Because all that would have answered all your questions. I referred to my previous posts several times and right after your initial remark.

Yeah, and I wanted it in MY PHRASING. Did I read the whole thread? No. I don't need to. Why? Because that's a tad extreme and because my question was posed in real time, meaning that it was part of the subject of date that was happening, not something I resurrected out of no where.

Originally posted by Kram3r
What? No. You did ignore me. You ignored the most important part of that post. I just showed you, are you blind?

ig·nore (g-nôr, -nr)
tr.v. ig·nored, ig·nor·ing, ig·nores
To refuse to pay attention to; disregard.

I replied, twice at least, so I was not ignoring you... I just didn't speicifically answer your specific little question in exactly your specific phrasing.... Well, booohooo.

Originally posted by Kram3r
Yeah, and I wanted it in [B]MY PHRASING. [/B]

Chick Hicks: Look at me. ME! ME! ME!

[

Originally posted by Kram3r
Did I read the whole thread? No.

Not the whole thread, just two or three pages before it. And I told you that, fairly right away.

Originally posted by queeq
ig·nore (g-nôr, -nr)
tr.v. ig·nored, ig·nor·ing, ig·nores
To refuse to pay attention to; disregard.

I replied, twice at least, so I was not ignoring you... I just didn't speicifically answer your specific little question in exactly your specific phrasing.... Well, booohooo.that, fairly right away.

It wasn't even about my phrasing that time, it was a new comment dealing with the discussion which you totally ignored.

Originally posted by queeq
Chick Hicks: Look at me. ME! ME! ME!

😐

Originally posted by queeq
Not the whole thread, just two or three pages before it. And I told you that, fairly right away.

Okay, so like I said, directly after that sentence, yes.

And on a side note, why do you think someone SHOULD BY ALL MEANS answer your question if you include "phrasings" like my "stupid logic"?
You start out aggressively and demand a tailor made reply, and demonstrating a laziness to read into what someone said as well. And then you also accuse me of impoliteness. Some nerve... or lack of self knowlegde.