government links to this site:
enter the state and you get the congressmens official website were it shows if you look right thier list of hard and soft money contributions. 😐
government links to this site:
enter the state and you get the congressmens official website were it shows if you look right thier list of hard and soft money contributions. 😐
The last debate sealed my vote for Kerry. I'll tell you what did it..
Bush's response to the question about gay marriage was absolutely sickening. As he answered the question babbling about how gay marriage would basically ruined the 'sanctity of marriage" I was reminded of all the blindly religious hick retards who think gay people getting married would somehow ruin it for everyone else. Then, I realized that's pretty much who Bush is, a religious, hateful, hypocritical bigot.
"I'm for equal rights and I think ga people should be allowed to live the way they want, but if they are allowed to get married then it will ruin marriage for everyone because GAY PEOPLE ARE DOING IT." What's the underlying message there? You just know he uses the excuse of "well I guess I'm just old fashioned, gay people shouldn't have the same right to get a document pledging their love for one another that's recognized by the country". You know what else is old fashioned? Thinking black people should be forced to ride in the back of the bus. Bigot.
Bush is a dumbass prejudice hick who changed the american constitution to coincide with his prejudice beliefs.
this is even easier for you... enter the fields... OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT RECORDS MIND YOU. A .GOV site
Originally posted by BackFire
The last debate sealed my vote for Kerry. I'll tell you what did it..Bush's response to the question about gay marriage was absolutely sickening. As he answered the question babbling about how gay marriage would basically ruined the 'sanctity of marriage" I was reminded of all the blindly religious hick retards who think gay people getting married would somehow ruin it for everyone else. Then, I realized that's pretty much who Bush is, a religious, hateful, hypocritical bigot.
"I'm for equal rights and I think ga people should be allowed to live the way they want, but if they are allowed to get married then it will ruin marriage for everyone because GAY PEOPLE ARE DOING IT." What's the underlying message there? You just know he uses the excuse of "well I guess I'm just old fashioned, gay people shouldn't have the same right to get a document pledging their love for one another that's recognized by the country". You know what else is old fashioned? Thinking black people should be forced to ride in the back of the bus. Bigot.
Bush is a dumbass prejudice hick who changed the american constitution to coincide with his prejudice beliefs.
i understand. but how do you expect a human being to ignore all the teachings and morals they were brought up with... the guy is 50+ and a new age tells him its ok.. what would you expect your Grandpa or Grandma to say? I would be scared if the President of the United States had no standings and just followed the whims of ups and downs of public opinion. Technically what Massechutes and San Fransisco had done was totally illegel, they tried to force all the States to accept thier ideology.
Originally posted by RaventheOnly
this is even easier for you... enter the fields... OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT RECORDS MIND YOU. A .GOV site
ok, thanks for the link.
so, i searched 3 names so far on the link i gave you and all three are valid.
please search for yourself if you dont believe me.
Originally posted by RaventheOnly
i understand. but how do you expect a human being to ignore all the teachings and morals they were brought up with... the guy is 50+ and a new age tells him its ok.. what would you expect your Grandpa or Grandma to say? I would be scared if the President of the United States had no standings and just followed the whims of ups and downs of public opinion. Technically what Massechutes and San Fransisco had done was totally illegel, they tried to force all the States to accept thier ideology.
My mom's older then he is and she was probably brought up under the same morals, however, she thinks it's stupid that gay people aren't allowed to be married.
It's called THINKING FOR YOURSELF, something Bush should check out. I could care less if he wants to follow outdated morals, he should not be president if he's still using morals from teh 1940's. The morals that existed when he was young are not the same as now. The morals from when he was a child also stated that it was okay for black people to be forced to ride in the back of a bus and force them to have their own drinking fountain because white people didn't want them contaminating theres. Morals must change, if they didn't change slavery would still exist in this country.
Outdated, prejudice morals have no place in the presidential office, PERIOD.
Originally posted by hunchy
I'm sure there are fans of both parties out there that thinks that their candidate was best in each debate.
I agree with you to a point. The trouble with your argument is not everyone is in a party. I say that Kerry won the last debate. Not just because I think he is the better candidate but because independents overwhelmingly said Kerry won.
'A CNN/USA Today/Gallup snap poll taken immediately after the presidential debate found that respondents gave a significant edge to Kerry with 52% over Bush with 39%. The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.
The numbers were similar to the results of a poll taken the night of the first debate September 30 in Miami, Florida. That night Kerry was favored by a 53 percent to 37 percent margin.
Kerry and Bush were almost even in the second debate on October 5, with the numbers falling within the margin of error.
The respondents Wednesday were 511 registered voters who watched the debate. Their political affiliations broke down as 36 percent Republican, 36 percent Democratic and 28 percent independent.'
Let's assume of Bush's 39% that 36% of it is the Republican's that voted in the poll. That only leaves 3% independents saying Bush won. Yes, I am simplifying the results. I am sure that some Republican's stated that Kerry did a better job in the debate. The point is that Kerry is gaining a lead over Bush not only in the debate polls but regular polls.
Polls aren't extremely reliable but I bet the Bush camp is getting a bit concerned. Bush can't expect to win by going around the country talking to people that are already voting for him. His best chance to reach the independent voters was during the debates.
It is like you saw 3 different Bush's during the debates. 1st debate the idiot, 2nd debate the angry guy, 3rd debate the smiley liberal basher.
You say Kerry was a robot. I saw a consistent, passionate person. For Bush I saw a man with no consistency and multiple personalities. 😛
Originally posted by PVS
ok, thanks for the link.
so, i searched 3 names so far on the link i gave you and all three are valid.
please search for yourself if you dont believe me.
you are a total liar. plain and simple. there are over 100+ contributions from everywhere. you cannot tell me you found the spacific ones you are looking for in 5 minutes. i could spend hours sifting through the specific lists.
Originally posted by BackFire
My mom's older then he is and she was probably brought up under the same morals, however, she thinks it's stupid that gay people aren't allowed to be married.It's called THINKING FOR YOURSELF, something Bush should check out. I could care less if he wants to follow outdated morals, he should not be president if he's still using morals from teh 1940's. The morals that existed when he was young are not the same as now. The morals from when he was a child also stated that it was okay for black people to be forced to ride in the back of a bus and force them to have their own drinking fountain because white people didn't want them contaminating theres. Morals must change, if they didn't change slavery would still exist in this country.
Outdated, prejudice morals have no place in the presidential office, PERIOD.
Then non existent new age are? 😑
The predjudice teachings that existed were a product of hate... not Christianity.... the guy is a recovering alchoholic born again Christian... no such thing in the 1940's.... 😬
Originally posted by RaventheOnly
um... are you the same Backfire i've been talking to? 😑
Yes. Why?
"The predjudice teachings that existed were a product of hate... not Christianity.... the guy is a recovering alchoholic born again Christian... no such thing in the 1940's.... "
And this has to do with what exactly?
Originally posted by RaventheOnly
you are a total liar. plain and simple. there are over 100+ contributions from everywhere. you cannot tell me you found the spacific ones you are looking for in 5 minutes. i could spend hours sifting through the specific lists.
there really is no need to accuse and insult me raven.
just follow the link i gave you, it will list the companies.
click the contribution link for one company and it will give
you a list of names of people under that company who contributed.
use the query on the site which you provided and simply type that person's first and last name. it takes little time at all
here's the link again:
http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/read.asp?fn=df03102004.html
Originally posted by BackFire
Yes. Why?"The predjudice teachings that existed were a product of hate... not Christianity.... the guy is a recovering alchoholic born again Christian... no such thing in the 1940's.... "
And this has to do with what exactly?
you are very hostile this time and your sentence structure and manner is different. 😐
nothing 😛 just giving an analysis of why all the stereotypes you drew were wrong 😐
Originally posted by PVS
there really is no need to accuse and insult me raven.
just follow the link i gave you, it will list the companies.
click the contribution link for one company and it will give
you a list of names of people under that company who contributed.
use the query on the site which you provided and simply type that person's first and last name. it takes little time at all
no... you have to give the running date. the election time slot... the actual pre or post part of the election and official dates. 😐 that is far beyond anything that i am willing to find unless i am getting a grade for it... it took me 3 hours to find the info i was looking for last time and there is no way in heck that it only took 5 minutes.
srry but i am touchy when it comes to research.
Originally posted by PVS
here's the link again:http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/read.asp?fn=df03102004.html
thse numbers are not official though. they could be all the money contributed in the past 20 years by the same company. 😐