Originally posted by chickenlover98
i dont really think there were many mentions of black people in the bible.
well look at Ruth, Queen of Sheba ,pluse when Moses lead them people out of Egypt there were blacks. So far the only people who hair is like wool are Black people. In the end what dose it really maker he's still Lord
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
But if he can walk on water, rise from the dead and heal the sick he'd still be Jesus. Just the real one not the sugar coated version in the Bible.
mmmk ever heard of a parlor trick? if chris angel can do it it, so can ur jesus.and you know how people blow things out of proportion.
for instance the mythoogical creature the kraken. it was really a take on the giant squid, which is harmless and doesnt attack humans. hell jesus coulda just been a doctor blown WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY outta proportion
The Bible never gives any physical description of Christ. The closest thing we get to a description is in Isaiah 53:2b, “He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to Him, nothing in His appearance that we should desire Him.” All this tells us is that Jesus’ appearance was just like any other man's – He was ordinary-looking. Isaiah was here prophesying that the coming suffering Servant would arise in lowly conditions and wear none of the usual emblems of royalty, making His true identity visible only to the discerning eye of faith.
Isaiah further describes the appearance of Christ as He would appear as He was being scourged prior to His crucifixion. “His appearance was so disfigured beyond that of any man and his form marred beyond human likeness” (Isaiah 52:14). These words describe the inhuman cruelty He suffered to the point that He no longer looked like a human being (Matthew 26:67; 27:30; John 19:3). His appearance was so awful that people looked at Him in astonishment.
Most of the images we have of Jesus today are probably not accurate. Jesus was a Jew, so He likely had dark skin, dark eyes, and dark hair. This is a far cry from the blond-haired, blue-eyed, fair-skinned Jesus in many modern pictures. One thing is clear: if it were important for us to know what He really did look like, Matthew, Peter and John, who spent three years with Him, would certainly be able to give us an accurate description, as would His own brothers, James and Jude. Yet, these New Testament writers offer no details about His physical attributes.
Originally posted by ushomefree
Most of the images we have of Jesus today are probably not accurate. Jesus was a Jew, so He likely had dark skin, dark eyes, and dark hair. This is a far cry from the blond-haired, blue-eyed, fair-skinned Jesus in many modern pictures.
so thats why hitler thought they were the perfect soldiers.