Originally posted by dark1365
Read the damned Halo novels. He's human, alright. They only reason why they called him "cyborg" is that scientists grafted stuff in his body, like ceramic layering on his skeletal structure, and capilliary boost under his eyes.. Jeez, I'll send you a couple passages from The Fall of Reach if it takes that to convince you he's human.
Seriously....you're asking me to read a book about a video game. 🤨
Originally posted by Linkalicious
Seriously....you're asking me to read a book about a video game. 🤨
And we haven't been doing that?
And I'd like to direct Master Chief supporters here
Originally posted by dark1365
Nope...put them both without armor, and with only a plasma pistol., nothin' else. Samus relies on technology so much, that she'll lose, easy.
i just wanna say before i post this that i dont really know that much about either character, i have not researched them or anything like that.
my opinions have been based upon what i have read in this thread, as its the place ive learent about both characters most, which leads me yp what you said dark. i have read a lot of people say that MC is a cyborg with a human brain, so when you say samus RELIES on technology, which is bad, doesnt this mean that masterchief IS technology? which would be worse, reliying(sp?) on technology or being technology?
i dont want this to be taken the wrong way like my last adding was 😮 and appologies if i got the wrong end of the stick!
Intresting point but I'm not sure. I'd like to say something in MC's favor because there is something he has that I'm fairly sure Samus doesn't...a sniper rifle. If MC could get into a good posistion he could just camp there and take out Samus with a high velocity bullet to the face. Close up and personal though I still say Samus'll come out on top.
Originally posted by ChickinMeat
i just wanna say before i post this that i dont really know that much about either character, i have not researched them or anything like that.my opinions have been based upon what i have read in this thread, as its the place ive learent about both characters most, which leads me yp what you said dark. i have read a lot of people say that MC is a cyborg with a human brain, so when you say samus [b]RELIES
on technology, which is bad, doesnt this mean that masterchief IS technology? which would be worse, reliying(sp?) on technology or being technology?i dont want this to be taken the wrong way like my last adding was 😮 and appologies if i got the wrong end of the stick! [/B]
Originally posted by dark1365.... both of them without armor? do you realise that armor is 50% of thier arsenal? in any case, if you've seen samus by using the justin bailey code for NES, you'd know she's just as agile w/o armor on.. I cant say the same for chief.... and why would samus want to use a plasma pistol of the halo world?.. her beam cannon would slaughter a silly halo weapon.
Nope...put them both without armor, and with only a plasma pistol., nothin' else. Samus relies on technology so much, that she'll lose, easy.
Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
.... both of them without armor? do you realise that armor is 50% of thier arsenal? in any case, if you've seen samus by using the justin bailey code for NES, you'd know she's just as agile w/o armor on.. I cant say the same for chief.... and why would samus want to use a plasma pistol of the halo world?.. her beam cannon would slaughter a silly halo weapon.
Prime is really not a good game to judge the Metroid series by. If you want a fair assestment of Metroid, try Super Metroid.
Again, auto-aim is irrelevant to this discussion.
And as far as how Samus has more than MC and that somehow makes it "easier" for her, so what? Look at it this way: If someone is coming at YOU with a 16th-century revolver, and you have to choose between a like revolver or a machine gun, which are you going to choose? If I were to apply your thinking to that situation, then you would be not as good because you had a better weapon.
Since when is using the best available to you a sign of weakness? Seems more like a sign of intelligence, to me.
I don't know about this one. Master Chief is definetly way cooler cause he's a badass, and I'm not saying Samus isn't, it's just that Master Chief is, well, cooler. dj
Samus, though, has all that high-tech weaponry.
But then again, Master Chief has some good weapons, too.
But then again, it depends on what's open to them.
But then again, it depends on where they're at.
But then again, I don't know why I keep saying but then again.
Overall, even though I think Master Chief is cooler and the Halo games are better, I'm going to have to vote for Samus on this one.
See, the problem I see here is that Chief supporters keep saying that Chief is "cooler," but I have yet to read any actual REASONS why they think so.
"Master Chief is cooler because... well, he just is."
I could easily say, "Master Chief is really C-3PO because... well, he just is."
Both assertions are equally illogical, because neither offers PROOF.
Some correct logical assertions:
Samus is cooler because she's infuzed with Chozo blood.
Samus is cooler because she's got ultra-high-tech advanced weaponry, all in a compact little arm cannon that reloads instantly, and usually doesn't need ammo.
Samus is cooler because she's a bounty hunter, and all bounty hunters are cool.
(Yes, this is a correct logical assertion. For the speaker, part B (about all bounty hunters being cool) is taken as fact, and the fact in B instantly proves part A to be fact as well.)
You see? If you want to say Chief is cooler, please give some ABSOLUTE reasons why. Otherwise, you just look like a fool.