Duronkiller> Why should I? I won’t waste my time on blatant ignorance. Come back when you have something that even mildly resembles an argument. 🙄
Clickclick> Well, you think your question is glaringly obvious. It’s not my job to decipher what you think. It’s you job to make your points clear – and NOT change your mind every other post as to WHAT is your question.
“Yes I know what a singularity is, I know what singularities are.”
Fine explain it to me. I want to make sure you understand what it is. Because I’m not sure you DO understand, seeing as you ask: “How the singularity CAME to be, how it existed outside of space and time. Etc.” So, please give me your best shot at what a singularity is – AND – more importantly, why they appear in the general theory of relativity.
“I dont speak your language so suggesting we switch over to that is as at best, as reasonable as my offer to switch over to French..”
Oh no, it’s about time you apologized for attacking my “lousy” English. Not only is it a logic fal-lacy - it’s even worse when you use this against someone whose first language is NOT English. Am I getting through to you at ALL???
“If you wait forever the impossible will happen? Doesnt make much sense. The impossible stays impossible, forever doesnt change that.”
Ah. Now we’re getting somewhere. How well-versed are you in statistics?
We usually use odds, saying there is a 1:6 chance of getting a particular number when rolling a dice. We can also ask, how LONG should we, statistically wait, to be ABSOLUTELY sure to get a, say, 4 on the dice?
Now, both forever and impossible can be described using infinity, yes?
You may call the explanations “laughable” all you like. I know what I’m talking about, so we could also debate WHAT exactly is laughable here
😉
Well, you think your question is glaringly obvious. It’s not my job to decipher what you think. It’s you job to make your points clear – and NOT change your mind every other post as to WHAT is your question.
I dont know what your job is period. It would be easier though if you didnt have such trouble indentifying something so glaringly obvious.
Fine explain it to me. I want to make sure you understand what it is. Because I’m not sure you DO understand, seeing as you ask: “How the singularity CAME to be, how it existed outside of space and time. Etc.” So, please give me your best shot at what a singularity is – AND – more importantly, why they appear in the general theory of relativity.
Im still waiting for my answer. I dont really mind answering your question but im still waiting for you to answer mine.
Oh no, it’s about time you apologized for attacking my “lousy” English. Not only is it a logic fal-lacy - it’s even worse when you use this against someone whose first language is NOT English. Am I getting through to you at ALL???
It wasnt my fault that you didnt understand the term I used. Just grab a dictionary next time, ok? Yeah im right on the verge of giving you an underserved apology. *please not my sarcasm*. I find it moderately amusing that you have the audacity to ask for one. Or was it not you who had that childish outburst?
Ah. Now we’re getting somewhere. How well-versed are you in statistics?
We usually use odds, saying there is a 1:6 chance of getting a particular number when rolling a dice. We can also ask, how LONG should we, statistically wait, to be ABSOLUTELY sure to get a, say, 4 on the dice?
Now, both forever and impossible can be described using infinity, yes?
Odds? Never heard of such a thing, thanks for bringing that to my attention. You can go on forever but the impossible remains impossible.
What you are suggesting is rolling a 6 sided dice, number 1-6 and getting an 18. Roll it all you like.
You may call the explanations “laughable” all you like. I know what I’m talking about, so we could also debate WHAT exactly is laughable here
Ok........
No I don't, I think that Lawlessnes is the state that was in the beginnign then people decided to come together and invent morals and laws to support their own Idea of Moral right behavior. And I agree with that.Are you maybe familiar with Hobbes and Leviathan, parts from it I think are agreeable.
Certainly there would be people who wouldnt take to the idea but I would think that someone who believes in moral subjectivism would need to.
Any parts in particular or overall message??
Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't really get what you are trying to say
Isn't my proverb good? or maybe it should be called a statement instead of a proverb?? what can't u not understand?? okok.. I left out the possibility of nature creating God, but that is because it is not possible, because according to the Bible, God created everything.. within 6 days.. and as I know from science, nature created us, and I'm pretty sure of it, and in case I was/am wrong, I have added that "if God didn't create nature"..... so that should explain everything??
Originally posted by frodo34x
I'd call it a statement.On a tangent, an ex-girlfreind of mine, who was pretty extreme with religion, used to get really pissed at people who made their own proverbs, claiming that adding to the bible (ie the book of proverbs) is a sin.
Erm... to make it clear with you, I didn't add anything to the Bible..... IF YOU READ CAREFULLY..... and I know that it is a sin to change or adding to the Bible is a sin.... thankyou..
It's a sin to add to or change the Bible??? Everything seems to be a sin... but how is that one? There are hundreds of versions out there that are all slightly different, or some very different... and the bible itself was only decided on when the Church decided to put together a cohesive doctrine, so I don't see how it could be a sin...