for someone located in the states one asume English being the first language since that is the official language of that place.
Well there are a number of people out here whos first language is Spanish, one shouldn't really assume. Im not orginally from america anyway. French was my first language to be honest.
Which is not true.
Ok, why do you believe this to be true?
How can I, when you stubbornly refuse to tell me at which skill-level of physics you want your answer.
I’m beginning to suspect you do not WANT the answer, and prefer to remain ignorant. If this is not the case, let me know how much you know about space-time singularities, and how and why they arise in the general theory of relativity. If you have no clue it is okay, I can still explain it to you somewhat in laymens terms.
You asked me if I knew what singularities were, to which I told you yes. I dont see how that constitutes stubborness.
Go back a few pages and see when you attacked my use of the English language. Then you’ll realise it was simply bad argumentation technique having zip to do with my understanding a concept of yours.
I did go back and it remains the same. The meaning of impossibility is that a possibility simply does not exist. So if the possbility does not exist, what relevance is infinite time?
Let’s take the simple function f(x)=1/x which is only possible for x real except zero. You with me? You just answer “yes” or “no” here.
You DO know what a simple function in 1D is, right???
Please just get to the point.
No, you’re making a fool of yourself trying to understand what I mean.
Well it would seem that you were refering to the creation of the universe right? Beyond space and time. If I assumed incorrectly and you were talking about something else, then my mistake.
Ah, so you do not want to know? How am I supposed to explain how the impossible becomes possible, when you do not want to learn, do not want to see it mathematically and do not want to tell me what your knowledge of singularities are, so I can give you your answer?
Oh, well… I tried, you seemed to want to know to begin with, but it’s no loss for me.
In truth my question was about existence of the singularity. Id prefer it be a short answer but an answer at all should suffice.
French was my first language to be honestmy condolences
Well there are a number of people out here whos first language is Spanish, one shouldn't really assume.even so, in an English speaking country you do assume the first language of people is the official languages of the country. Citizens of other countries living there may have a different language as first language, but even so they are surrounded by English speaking people and should learn it fast.
Originally posted by The Omega
For me to do that I need to make sure that YOU know what a singularity is. You’ve already complained at previous explanations (such as 1-1=0 and nothingness) so I need to know your skill-level in physics. If I use laymen’s terms you’ll complain, if I start to go tensor-metrics on you you’ll complain, and I won’t waste my time on your complaints.
If you do NOT know what a singularity is – and how they arise in the general theory of relativity (and WHY they arise in said theory) you have NO way of grasping the answers.
Do you understand this?
im sure youre more well versed than me....
but you always post in here... "its the singularity"... thats boring... try something new...
how could the big bang be proven by the singularity considering the relativity of time (when time was at point 0!?), if einstein said that singularity doesnt exist in physics?
i think i understand what youre trying to tell me but, your posts dont seem to be more qualified than mine...
i dont know... are black holes proven (yet)? because of the radiation? i think black holes exist.... (but that doesnt matter right now)
but why would that be a proof of singularity? maybe its just such a high gravity because of the amount of positrons, and so on.....!?
i dont think the singularity theory has been proven..... could you give any evidence for it? if it isnt... then why do you try to prove a theory with a not (yet) proven supposition, which acts as another theory?
sorry if i am wrong but... i dont know much 😉 so please be patient....
Originally posted by Bardock42
Hmm
I belive you are wrong.
I think Humanity created god cause they couldn'T deal with their insignificance.
So the guy with a little Penis drew a guy with a huge penis to make himself feel less inadequate?
Thomas Aquinas said that anything that begins to exist must have a cause (quantum vacuums are made of energy; they need a cause. As many have said, there's no such thing as a free lunch). God didn't begin to exist, so he doesn't need a cause.
People have been thinking that the universe is eternal since Aristotle. This viewpoint is not exclusionary to God
Originally posted by Ytaker
So the guy with a little Penis drew a guy with a huge penis to make himself feel less inadequate?
No the guy with no friends drew a imaginary friend that is way powerful and likes him cause nobody else does.
And even if their has to be something eternal, then to say that it must be a person that cares for some little shitty planet way off in the universe, and that he banged some girl there and got her pregnant is just .... well....weird I guess. If some guy told me that and I never heard of you crazy christians before I tell him to **** off and then I would call the policfe cause that guy needxs ****ing help.
Bardock42
First of all, Jesus Christ was born if a VIRGIN woman.
Second, just because you lack love for the world does not indicate that God hates the world! You have the IQ of a popcorn fart. God loves all His creation; even YOU! And so, Jesus Christ died on the cross to pay the penalty for our sin you wipe the slate clean.
People can except salvation and repent from their sins, or continue being lovers of pleasure, and not lovers of God!
Your choice! And God will punish those who refuse to except Him, and pay no heed to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ accordingly.
The tradition that Jesus was born of a virgin is traced back to a supposed prophecy in Isaiah. The term "virgin" appears in the Greek translation but the original Hebrew word, ha-almah, means "young woman" while it was translated into Greek with the word parthenos, which means virgin.
The Hebrew word for that, if that is what the author had meant to say, would have been bethulah. The phrase in which it appears, ha-alma hara, means "the young woman is pregnant".
Second, just because you lack love for the world does not indicate that God hates the world! You have the IQ of a popcorn fartand still his iq is way above yours
And further more, if what YOU say is true, why was Jesus' birth so famous if not of a VIRGIN woman?well considered that virgin births was considered divine they had no choice but to make the story of jesus birth that of a virgin birth.
Finti
Right, the virgin birth was made up. Why didn't I think of that? Very original.
Try doing that yourself. If your married, try telling family members and friends that your wife became pregnant without intercourse.
When you do this, try not to laugh out loud and divorce yourself from all the laughter around you!
If you did this, and it was successful, those friends and family members would be incredibly stupid.
You can't just make outrageous claims of this caliber if it were not true! You seem to forget, that people (even in biblical times) had eyes and brains to reason.