Alpha Centauri
Restricted
"What im saying is that Kirsten isnt a bad actress, is much more the script fault and raimi fault than her fault. Althought she was a little lazy to prepare the part more, isnt really her fault."
It's not her fault that SHE was lazy? Of course it was. Sam didn't make her lazy. I never said she was a shit actress either, just saying she was lazy and THAT'S why.
"The movie is man spider, because it is about a guy with organics and not funny at all, and spider man is a guy with webshooters and funny, so, the character in the movie is man spider, there are a clear difference with spider man"
I think you will find, Boybaker, that the movie is infact called "Spider-Man". The character in it is called Spider-Man. It's not called Man-Spider just because you want it to be.
"If you cant deal with that, is your problem."
If I can't deal with it? You're the person who has such a hard time dealing with the fact that some people DO actually like the movies. If you hate them with such a passion that you let it consume you, go for it man. Totally. That doesn't mean you have the right to try and make it seem like it's a fact. Your opinion is that the movie sucks. Mine is that it doesn't. End.
"A good script and a good movie doesnt need to be Hamlet or Macbeth. Superman has a pretty good script and wasnt Shakespeare. That argument is ridiculous."
Out of Spider-Man you are expecting a performance of classical levels though. That's the ridiculous thing.
"Clearly, man spider and its sequel were two of worst movies that i have ever seen in years, as bad as catwoman was , as you have said, it a matter of opinion and taste."
What movie are you talking about? What Man-Spider movie? Has anyone here seen it? Anyway, no Superhero movie is as bad as Catwoman. None. To put any other movie on that level is just stupid.
"I dont say what mr parker say, im agree with him in this matter , but we have different points of view in another things. If he is agree with me in that, is normally that we post almost the same arguments and points of view. I dont know who Ekleton is, is the first time that i have seen his posts, but im agree with him in what he posted for the moment. "
Of course you do, because you all say the same thing.
"And at last, you are the disgracee for the true spider fans. People like you, acepting any movie about the character are the ones who are proud to be true spider man fans and then go to the cinema and see any kind of spider man movie because is only a guy with a spider man costume on screen. you are the only disgracee here, sir."
I was thinking of taking it back when I called you an idiot but I realise now it wasn't an insult. You actually are incompetent. Your whole hatred of the movie is him not having webshooters.
Let's take a look at that again, coz it's a little baffling at first glance.
Your reason for hating this movie is because he doesn't have webshooters. Ok he doesn't have webshooters, but he still shoots web from his arms by curling in his fingers. You're no true fan. You've abandoned Spider-Man as soon as something YOU didn't like happened. Stan Lee and Steve Ditko obviously thought genetic webbing was a great idea and they created the character that you claim to love. If they thought it was good and if they aren't sitting there bitching, whining and crying about it, why are you?
The answer is because you want Marvel to change everything and apologise to you. You feel like Marvel OWE it to you.
Newsflash buddy: They've got real fans like me, Cat, PR and many others in the comics forum who support them and their choices provided that the changes are justified. You are so far up your own crack to swallow your pride and admit that you're insignificant.
This whooping has been presented courtesy of Alpha Centauri Incorporated.
-AC