Originally posted by Mr Parker
You need to look in the mirror when calling someone a troll.engaging in name calling just because someone criticises a movie you like would qualify as being a troll. 🙄
Well before you have a hissy fit Mr Parker perhaps you should do some research because I was only quoting the words that have been spoken of you and others several times and even in this very thread as seen below. So before you assume something look around first.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Don't feed the troll, please.
Originally posted by spider-venom
good special effects and alfred played it well,but the backround of ock being good then turning bad was pretty lame
What Bull crap is this?
Otto Octavius was good in the comics too.He wasnt a criminal.He went crazy after his accident.Same with Norman Osborn.
Doctor Octopus-Science created him,evil corrupted him.
Ok did you notice at the demonstration when Spider-Man tried to pull the plug on the reactor Otto viciously swiped him away.That was kinda nasty wouldnt you say 😉
And I loved the A.I. tentacles.Really creepy.And Otto didnt take much convincing to turn bad.He just needed a nudge which is what the tentacles gave him.
He loved being the villain."Butterfingers" 😄
Originally posted by Ock
What Bull crap is this?Otto Octavius was good in the comics too.He wasnt a criminal.He went crazy after his accident.Same with Norman Osborn.
Doctor Octopus-Science created him,evil corrupted him.
Well he wasnt evil by any means but he was an unlikable guy in the beginning,he was an arrogant prick who gave you the impression that he was a madman and mentally unstable even though he is obvioulsy an intelligent guy.But the MOVIE showed NONE of that,just a super nice guy as Red Superfly pointed out.Same old mistake from the first film,Norman Osborn is a good guy in the beginning,but only becomes bad AFTER the accident.In the comics as I remember,he was very unlikable as Norman before the accident,he was corrupted and did not care if he hurt others,just as long as he was rich and powerful was all that mattered to him.He was selfish and greedy,none of which we saw in the movie.So like Red Superfly said so well in his post,kinda ruins it all for The Lizard in the next film since Doc Connors unlike Norman Osborn or Otto Octavious,WAS a good guy before becoming The Llizard.It will just be repeating itself now for the third time as he pointed out.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ock
[B]Ok did you notice at the demonstration when Spider-Man tried to pull the plug on the reactor Otto viciously swiped him away.That was kinda nasty wouldnt you say 😉
Sure that was nasty of him to do that to him but it didnt by any means show that he was a jerk of a guy.Here he was getting ready to fulfill his dream of what he was working on,and the last thing he wanted was someone to stop him so just a mere slap at Peter as spiderman didnt do anything to indicate to the audience that he was a jerk before becoming DOC OCK.
Please, im sick of that bullshit. Please, man spider fans, read a comic before posting. Because in the comics, OTTO OCTAVIOUS WAS AN ARROGANT AND POMPOUS PRICK , AN UNLIKABLE AND MENTHALLY UNESTABLED GUY OBSESSED WITH HIS EXPERIMENTS. THAT IS IN AMAZING SPIDERMAN NUMBER 3, GO AND READ IT. not like in those man spider movies in what otto octavius is mr nice scientist before the accident and becoming a hero at the end, mr nice guy controlled by the evil tentacles( so, this is possible in a movie and not the web shooters, go to hell, Raimi and sony). And yes, as my friend mr parker has said very well, they did the same thing with norman osborn.
And for that guy who called us trolls, the only trolls here, sir, are the man spider fanatics who insulted us for post that we dont like those movies,so, stop that stupid troll stuff.
Originally posted by Mr Parker
Norman Osborn is a good guy in the beginning,but only becomes bad AFTER the accident.In the comics as I remember,he was very unlikable as Norman before the accident,he was corrupted and did not care if he hurt others,just as long as he was rich and powerful was all that mattered to him.He was selfish and greedy,none of which we saw in the movie.
So you call lying to the authorities about the serum and by doing so putting countless lives in danger and then testing it on himself and mistreating the assistant.........being a good guy and and not being selfish and greedy???
(All before the accident)
Originally posted by bakerboy
Only see the scene with norman , peter and harry. That is a nice guy, not the unselfish and arrogant guy from the comics. And those things that you have said doesnt proove that he was unselfish or unlikable, only obssesed with that experiment.
That was only one scene that you mentioned 😉
It does prove he was selfish, because he only cared about himself and his work, not the well being of his assistant or anyone else who might could have taken the dangerous serum.
Originally posted by TheFilmProphet
Well before you have a hissy fit Mr Parker perhaps you should do some research because I was only quoting the words that have been spoken of you and others several times and even in this very thread as seen below. So before you assume something look around first.
You playing follow the leader though and calling people trolls because someone else called us trolls qualifys YOU as a troll,you cant get around that. 🙄 you want to call someone a troll,then you should look no further than feceman.Vladimire merely stated an opinion and gets greeted as being a troll then you jump on the bandwagon and and do the same thing.duh. 🙄