Should gays be allowed to adopted kids?

Started by Afro Cheese41 pages

Of course they are "allowed" to be straight. They have the right to be heterosexual.. just not the ability.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Of course they are "allowed" to be straight. They have the right to be heterosexual.. just not the ability.

That a load of bullcrap elton john can bang paris hilton just as easy as anybody else

That doesn't make him straight. Being heterosexual means being attracted only to the opposite sex, not simply having sexual intercourse with the opposite sex. If he was attracted to Paris Hilton and had sex with her, that still wouldn't make him heterosexual, that would make him bisexual.

i would have sex with Paris!!

Scarpa> “My answer: HEll NO!”

There is nothing like an unfounded yelling like that. Well-put, a good argument, setting the stage for debating the pro’s and con’s of a topic…
Ah, blah!

This topic somehow reminds me of the “Is having children a right” thread a few months back.
Being “a” human being is unfortunately not the same as being a good parent. Anyone who disagrees should look up the definition of child-abuse, incest and child-beatings and other things parents seem perfect capable of inflicting on their children.
So… what is it that a priori should make a homosexual person a LESS fit parent than a straight person?
NOTHING!

So, is there anything in a persons sexuality that – a priori - makes him or her an unfit parent? No.

I can only assume that those who do not think gay people should be allowed to adopt, are the same people who still think homosexuality is a choice.

I voted for "I don't really care". Not my problem if gays adopt kids or not. And honestly......is the same crap to me whether they have parents or not.

There shouldn't be a problem with gay couples adopting children.... If they choose to then so be it.. A lack of respect is what america is today... People need to realize that gay people are entitled to adopt a child as much as a straight person is..If there was true respect, people would respect gay couples to adopt children..... I mean people would respect it if the couple was straight rite?....

I disagree with what some of you are saying.
What is the difference between a gay guy or a straight guy adopting kids. One of my friends dad is gay and he had been married for 29 years. Just because your gay it dosent mean that you are a kiddy fiddler or you don't love them, infact personally I think that gays are more loving and more sensitive. I mean look at marco out of BB5, I thought that he was lovely!

I totaly agree with AdventChild

Originally posted by AdventChild
There shouldn't be a problem with gay couples adopting children.... If they choose to then so be it.. A lack of respect is what america is today... People need to realize that gay people are entitled to adopt a child as much as a straight person is..If there was true respect, people would respect gay couples to adopt children..... I mean people would respect it if the couple was straight rite?....

No If gays what something to love and take care of they should go get a cat or something

Scarpa... If you're so against gay people then why were you avoiding my question onto which why being gay was unntaural... Until you can answer that i have nothing to discuss with you...."End of Story"...

i think it sould be ok that they sould because its not wrong to be gay what do you think?

I think there's nothing wrong with being gay... And there shouldn't be any problem if a gay couple wants to adopt a child... Theres no reason why gay couples should adopt a child.... As long as they are capable of raising the child is all that matters and to provide love and care as well...

Originally posted by AdventChild
Until you can answer that i have nothing to discuss with you...."End of Story"...

that would work in real life if he was your kid
but this is the internet, and you/he can just shrug and stick his/her own opinion 😬

yea... good point i thought of that... i just didn't think any one would say anything though.... ✅

People have said it before, and I will say it again, I see no evidence, just opinion, that suggests a gay person is unfit, or less fit, to raise a child then a heterosexual, I see nothing that suggests its unnatural (we're humans, we do unnatural things, like care for our elderly, where as if we were animals we would probably let the wolves take them), no reason why it would harm a child, no reason why a gay person has no right. I would like to see hard fact against it, instead of just conjecture, especially as I am all for it.

Wait wait wait one second.
We care for our elders?
Why the **** are we doing that.
Anyway why shouldn't gays be allowed, is there actually a reasonable reason (I don't mean a 4000 year old part in the Bible Christianns shouldn't believe in anyway)
I mean Gays are just as Loving and as good as Parents as anyone else, the only thing that is said here is that other kids would be mean to them, but that is the fault of Society not of the Gays, they shouldn't suffer from that.

I'm having problems with this term "allowed". At some point, perhaps everyone will realize that it's degrading to have to ask for permission to exist.

True, true. But sadly as law doesn't permit gay people easy access to adoption etc that is the whole thing "should gay people be allowed to adopt, just as heterosexual people are allowed to adopt"? But you are right, every person has a right to have a child unless they do something that makes them unsuitable to have children, and to be honest I see nothing that makes a homosexual unsuitable.

I completly agree!