Ok, whoever said he would have just shot sleeping gas out, that wouldn't stop the thugs. Joker would have just sent new guys out there. I think it was the right thing to do. He needed to end it, and he did. Keaton was the best.(don't give me no crap about Kilmer, he wore a silver suit. That is sad. At least Keaton had a decent costume.) Keaton was best. Kilmer was ok, Clooney sucked, and that's how we stand.
Originally posted by Bat Dude
Ok, whoever said he would have just shot sleeping gas out, that wouldn't stop the thugs. Joker would have just sent new guys out there. I think it was the right thing to do. He needed to end it, and he did. Keaton was the best.(don't give me no crap about Kilmer, he wore a silver suit. That is sad. At least Keaton had a decent costume.) Keaton was best. Kilmer was ok, Clooney sucked, and that's how we stand.
He is very cute to. The car was done right then to.
Then the more movies they made the more it seemed to suck. Hopefully they will turn things around with the new batman movie.
yes, We would had it made indeed.
So who wants to watch Batman and Robin again?? How many walk out the theater when you saw it?? I did. And they should have never put it out on Tape and DVD.
I bought it, because well, I hope my eyes were not fooling me, I was wrong, it was not my eyes, it was the movie.
Well, at least something is being done about it.
With the new Batman Trilogy (apparently its a trilogy with Scarecrow, Two-Face and finishing with Joker - rock on!) coming up, EVERYONE can erase the previous Batman movies from their minds if they like and pray that these new ones are the definitive Batman movies. So far the new Batman looks absolutely stunning.
I on the other hand quite like Tim Burtons two films. Sure I know they aren't truly in line with the comics, but I love how Burton adapted the story and made them brilliant stories and movies in their own right.
I think there's enough room for the new Batman movies and the Burton movies.
Batman Forever I actually ENJOY. I consider it to be a crappy Batman movie, and nowhere near as dark or serious as it should be, and it falls victim to some terrible Hollywood cliches, but for some reason, I can watch it and enjoy it.
Batman & Robin is just, urgh. Man how could anyone make such a bad movie? The fact that it involves Batman, arguably the finest comic book character of all time, makes it worse.
Lets just wait until the new Batman movie arrives. I'm totally stoked and looking forward to this "reboot" of the Batman franchise easily as much as Star Wars Episode III (and thats good considerring I'm a HUUUUUGE Star Wars nut)
Originally posted by Red Superfly
Well, at least something is being done about it.With the new Batman Trilogy (apparently its a trilogy with Scarecrow, Two-Face and finishing with Joker - rock on!)
Where did you hear this? If they were making new movies featuring the Two-Face and the Joker that would be f**king sweet! Since Batman Forever I've been wanting to see a movie that had only Two-Face as a villain like they've done with the Spidey movies, kind of like the 2 part Animated Series episode.
If you look at the evidence so far, it points in the direction of Two Face and Joker.
It isn't set in stone, but from the reports of Harvey Dent being in the movie, as well as Two-Face being pretty much made for a Director like Chris Nolan, I'd put my money on Two-Face being the next bad guy.
But, it's cool that there's definitley going to be three of them.
I seriously doubt Nolan would choose to do Clay Face or Man-bat or any other "supernatural" character. Even someone like Mr. Freeze is pushing it. Remember, these new Batman films are going for the super-realistic style, someone like Clay-Face or Freeze would completely defeat the idea.
The only other villains apart from Two-Face and Joker, would be Catwoman, Penguin and The Riddler.
The Penguin could make it into one of them I think, after all he is a self-appointed Kingpin type character, he's just a fat business man and probably the most realistic of all of Batmans villains. I hope they don't, because Penguin bores the living crap outta me.
I prefer the idea of ending the series with The Joker. Just because Joker appeared first in the comics doesn't mean anything to me. From a movie standpoint, it means nothing and actually is refreshing to see the arch nemesis being used last, to end the series with a bang.
If that's the case what about Spider-Man? Would you have preffered if The Green Goblin was replaced by The Chameleon? Would it have been better if the sequel had The Vulture instead of Doc Ock? Well Chameleon and Vulture were the first super villains Spidey fought, so they should have been first right? Also, Doc Ock came before Green Goblin, but the movies didn't do it like that and still worked.
The order in which the villains come into it has no meaning. It's always better in my opinion to have the arch enemy at the end of a saga.
These are movies after all. I mean, would you kill off Sauron at the start of Lord Of The Rings? Would you kill off Darth Vader in the first Star Wars? Would you kill off The Joker in the first movie?
Seriously, saving the best till last is a good thing. As a guy who seemingly loves the Joker I'd have thought you would understand that.