Does God have a right to judge us?

Started by Philosophicus16 pages
Originally posted by finti
so you started talking to yourself then

No. I said I was responding to idiocy - I was responding to you.

No. I said I was responding to idiocy - I was responding to you
the only idiot in here is you

the only idiot in here is you

what a luni

what a luni and what an idiot

what an anxious and deluded sorry little soul you are

No. Humans created God.

Originally posted by finti
what an anxious and deluded sorry little soul you are

Are you talking to yourself? 'Cause I would think you are an anxious and deluded sorry little soul .

Are you talking to yourself? 'Cause I would think you are an anxious and deluded sorry little soul

considering your little attempt to draw some symphaty

also be due to the fact that I suffer from mental disorders such as Clinical Depression, Anxiety disorder, ADHD, obsessive compulsive behaviour and Megalomania. I'm on strong medication for all of these.
makes one wonder

FINTI: "considering your little attempt to draw some symphaty
quote:
also be due to the fact that I suffer from mental disorders such as Clinical Depression, Anxiety disorder, ADHD, obsessive compulsive behaviour and Megalomania. I'm on strong medication for all of these.
makes one wonder"

All the greatest geniuses had mental disorders - it's the price you pay for having a brilliant mind. And I do have one - my poetry is admired in the USA and has been described by more than one individual of being ingenius and utterly unique and original. What do you have to show?

All the greatest geniuses had mental disorders - it's the price you pay for having a brilliant mind. And I do have one - my poetry is admired in the USA and has been described by more than one individual of being ingenius and utterly unique and original. What do you have to show?
all the great geniuses yes but we were talking about you, and the fact that you published some poetry doesnt make you a genious. And admired in the USA so what. Used to live in the States and there they admire the fact that I was bilangual just to show what little it takes to be admire there.
What I have to show, besides the fact that I am able to function in the real world and dont have mental disorders you mean?

Dont get me wrong I hold nothing against the fact that you are able to publish your work thats grteat, but it takes more than that to be considered a genious

"All the greatest geniuses had mental disorders - it's the price you pay for having a brilliant mind. And I do have one - my poetry is admired in the USA and has been described by more than one individual of being ingenius and utterly unique and original."

Yeah, just like how you are a philosophy teacher? Oh wait...

Backfire, go to voicesnet.org and search for my name: Werner Reyneke - you'll see my published poems. Also Meeting of the Mind Journal - the Labyrinth edition.

What proof do you have that this Werner Reyneke is actually you? Or that you wrote these poems?

Should I sent you the original manuscripts and a photocopy of my ID book? I don't have to proove it to you, because I know my real name is Werner Reyneke and that I really wrote the poems.

First lesson in basic argument/debate - If you're going to make a claim about yourself that is meant to give you some kind of credibility in a certain area of discussion, be prepared to conjure proof of said claim. Posting some craptastic website that looks like it was created by a college student who just read "Webpages for dummies" that has some poems, and saying "I wrote these, look, I'm a genius because of this" is not proof of anything. If you can't prove it's you then stop using it for the sole defense of your "genius".

You have to understand (seeing as you've admitted to lying before in order to gain credibility), that I do not trust any claim you make from here on out, unless you can prove that claim in some way.

Well, I'm sorry, I can't proove it to you, allthough it is the truth.

Originally posted by clickclick
Thats just not true and the argument is faulty at best. Once sin entered the world, so too could the bad things. That is the result of sin, the world was tainted and so was the line of men. However, God still allows for the good in the world, if people follow him and do what he asks, then they can be saved. If somebody decides not to, then they take responsibility.

why is that this time?
so when sin came in play, bad things arrived?
THAT is not true and faulty at best, the devil was already there and in my book that stands as a bad thing, he was there before sin

why is that this time?
so when sin came in play, bad things arrived?
THAT is not true and faulty at best, the devil was already there and in my book that stands as a bad thing, he was there before sin

Why is it what this time? They got punished for their disobedience and kicked out of paradise.

The devil was but a tempter, he couldnt make paradise cease.

Originally posted by clickclick
Why is it what this time? They got punished for their disobedience and kicked out of paradise.

The devil was but a tempter, he couldnt make paradise cease.

If the world was without evil, how do you explain the existence of the serpent? The serpent used deceit (evil) to tempt (evil) Eve into disobeying (evil) God.

Furthermore, if we presume that no evil existed in the world, how was Eve to know the difference between right and wrong?