Batman vs Wolverine

Started by FujiFuu19 pages

Originally posted by Punkyhermy
Also...what exactly is the definition of victory here?Surely, for Batman, killing Wolverine or any of his opponents would not equal to anything close to the term victory. Wolverine, on the other hand is the kind of guy who wons by killing.They are two polar personalities, both with a different state of mind about victory.

So if Batman gets away unscathed, defeating Wolverine WITHOUT killing him, which Batman ofcourse is capable enough to do,Batman wins. And since Batman will get away without getting himself killed by Wolverine,Wolvie looses, while for Batman, it may be victory.

If batman can incapacitate him long enough for wolverine not to get up 10 seconds later run him down and chop his head off, then sure he wins... this isnt if batman can run away before wolverine kills him then he wins... I still think wolverine would take it with or without claws.

No he wouldnt he would get knocked out in a second and then Batman would go take out fifty more henchmen just like him. Because without his powers he is not even wourthy to fight anyone from DC...those rich snobby bastards!

Originally posted by Cosmo Kramer
No he wouldnt he would get knocked out in a second and then Batman would go take out fifty more henchmen just like him. Because without his powers he is not even wourthy to fight anyone from DC...those rich snobby bastards!

Why are you refusing to accept that wolverine is probably more skilled in combat then batman, with or without his powers. It is obvious that you don't care how skilled wolverine is, or the very high likelyhood that he would beat batman, you're just trying to find ways that batman would beat him, because you don't look at facts, you only consider what you want.

Stop doing ths buster

Wow...so much angst in this thread. I think Punky said it best. Bats getting away unscathed would be a victory, and it is probably what WOULD happen SINCE THE WRITER wouldn't let the dark knight die. But writer interference notwithstanding, Bats would be the meat, tomato, or tin can on your next Ginsu commercial. I like Bats as much as the next guy because he is refreshingly human, not a suped up alien from out of this world, or some mutant.

Now to the real topic, and all you Bat lovin' wanne be drivin in his passenger seat of his bat mobile car: shut up!! You guys make me puke when you defend him from the most insane places of your brain.

The fight simply comes down to this: All Wolvie needs is that one window of opportunity before Bats pulls something out of his belt that would sudbue him (IFFFFF there's anything in there that could), or before Bats flees.

Yes, let us not forget that supreme intelligence also means you may flee to fight your opponent better another day, which Bats would probably do here, and makes the writer save face doing so too.

Someone please educate me about what Bats has in his belt that could slow or stop Wolvie.

Bah, Batman would just drive over Wolverine with his Batmobile until he would be unconscious.

Good on, Crawler. 😉

Originally posted by Cosmo Kramer
Im just saying Batman has to actually avoid the bullets or hed die, while Wolverine has been hit where he should already. That makes Batman a much better fighter. So if anything Logans healing factor shows just how much worse he truly is than any other comic book character.

Batman has taken so many bullets, hits, punches... you name it, that it's a miracle he's still able to walk. I'm beginning to wonder who the real mutant is...
So if anything Logans healing factor shows just how much worse he truly is than any other comic book character.

And didn't it ever occur to you that from the moment some comic-hero gets himself a healing factor, you can bet your life that in the next comic he will be shred to pieces, or blown to pieces, only to heal himself in a spectacular manner (ask Hulk, or Juggernaut, or Lobo, or Wolverine, or Deadpool, or even Spider-Man).

Do you really think if Batman would have a healing factor like Wolverines', writers would still make him dodge bullets ? Hah, think again !

Originally posted by BobbyD
Wow...so much angst in this thread. I think Punky said it best. Bats getting away unscathed would be a victory, and it is probably what WOULD happen SINCE THE WRITER wouldn't let the dark knight die. But writer interference notwithstanding, Bats would be the meat, tomato, or tin can on your next Ginsu commercial. I like Bats as much as the next guy because he is refreshingly human, not a suped up alien from out of this world, or some mutant.

Now to the real topic, and all you Bat lovin' wanne be drivin in his passenger seat of his bat mobile car: shut up!! You guys make me puke when you defend him from the most insane places of your brain.

The fight simply comes down to this: All Wolvie needs is that one window of opportunity before Bats pulls something out of his belt that would sudbue him (IFFFFF there's anything in there that could), or before Bats flees.

Yes, let us not forget that supreme intelligence also means you may flee to fight your opponent better another day, which Bats would probably do here, and makes the writer save face doing so too.


so if batman RETREATS, he wins....???? last time i checked that means running away from battle

for batman to retreat unscathed would mean for him to be at a rediculous distance and throw a snowball at wolvie....thats about as far as batmans fight would go before he retreats and ups the ante to a rock

Havoc, I know...sounds silly. But, there in essence sums up the fight in my opinion. Bats could flee and it would still be considered a victory? While someone like Wolvie would need a kill for it to be considered a victory? I think that says it all, and thus why most would say Wolvie should be able to carve up Bats like a Thanksgiving turkey. There's the proof!!

Again, Punky said all of this before me....gotta give my props where they're due.

I don't necessarily agree with this (the victorous outcomes), but I could see it this way. All the more futher, what if Wolvie flees? Which we all know would NEEEEEVVERRRRR happen. Why would he be considered the loser then? That's all the more ammo in this argument that says Wolvie should kill Bats. Yes, I mean homicide, murder, kill him.

Next, we will hear Batman fanboys say he can kill Thanos.

Wolverine isn't some psycho. He won't kill Batman, unless provoked, but otherwise, he won't go for the kill. He's a ferocious fighter with a strong killer instinct, but he's no bloodthirsty animal.

He's a very good fighter without his claws too.

When Wolverine's healing factor was on the fritz he dodged a great many of bullets because he could no longer afford to take them. But why wast your time dodging bullets, swords and thinks of the like if you don't have to. Superman could easily dodge all the bullets and missiles he's been hit with but it's a waste of time, so he doesn't.

Batman's too smart for this crap. First a few batarangs in all the wrong places (for wolvie) just to make him breath the gas harder and never see the flash bang grenade coming. Then Bats returns to squash wolvering under that giant coin he keeps in the cave.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
When Wolverine's healing factor was on the fritz he dodged a great many of bullets because he could no longer afford to take them. But why wast your time dodging bullets, swords and thinks of the like if you don't have to. Superman could easily dodge all the bullets and missiles he's been hit with but it's a waste of time, so he doesn't.

Wouldnt you try to dodge harpoons even if you had a healing factor? Come on so what if your gonna heal you will still have to feel that horrible aganizing pain. I would really try hard to avoid yanking an arrow or dart out of my groin.

Wolverine is a veritable killing machine. His body and mind have been conditioned to be such by the CIA, Weapon X, Team X...etc. Why are we questioning his skill? Wolverine fought through the Spanish American War, World War I & II, Vietnam. He's been battle active for well over half a century and has had more training and battle experience than Captain America. If Batman could keep Wolverine at bay I could see the man having a chance at winning. But once Wolverine got in close enough -- it'd be over. I'm assuming as I do with all these fights that it's a random one on one meeting and that each is fighting with the tools and skills on hand. In that case I still say Wolverine. You can only keep him at arms length for so long and sometimes even a second is TOO long.

Wolverine as said more then once he likes pain... he is a wierdo

woloverine got tooken out 5000 times in the comic by a couple knock out gas and batman has that in his belt the marjarity of the time

Most gasses don't work against Wolverine thanks to his healing factor, plain and simple. Only the strong stuff will have some effect.

I even saw Wolverine using teargas as a deodorant once.

Wolverine likes Beer too...maybe thats why i think he's so cool

Well if they ever fought it wouldnt take Batsy long to figure out James Howlett. Once his claws pop out Batman will change his fight plan you guys know this. Thats what he does. Im pretty sure hell figure out he has a healing factor cause of metal popping out of his knuckles. I think I would anyways. Batman and him are equal in fighitng and I know this is dabatable but its really close. Batman is way smarter than James and the smarter fighter wins most of the time. Batman is smart enough to stay away from his claws. Im sure he has some kind of gadget to make quick work of James. I guess now you boys are gonna take me apart for posting my opinion now. Well bring it on.