Originally posted by dean7879
u son of a *****
paranoid about what?
There won't be any member bashing here! If I catch anyone bashing another member this thread is getting close. And warnings will be issue.
And NO this is not your typical American that sensors other peoples opinions! No bashing means NO bashing!
It's not missing the point- the idea was advanced that attacking Iran could prove the downfall of the US as a superpower just as Germany or France attacking Russia was. And that idea is being throughly rebutted. The difficultites the US might have in an occupation are a different issue; for the time being I am smashing the idea that militarily defeating Iran would be any part of the problem.
That's just wishful thinking on your part, KD. I can't think of any apparent evidence that shows the US could not do it.
Ush at what point did I say the U.S. could not be victorious over Iran? I said that it will be more difficult than they think it will be. Funny thing is that a while ago I sauid that sure the U.S. will initially clobber the Iraqi forces, but then they'll have to deal with the worst gueruilla warfare that they've had to deal with in 30 years. Iranians will not run like Iraqis did because the Iraqis really didn't give a crap about dying for Sadam. This would be a different war, same sort of venue, but a different cast of characters.
As for apparent evidence, there is not alot of that to be found anywhere.
And I also said that this war would add onto already existing financial and diplomatic stresses the U.S. is experiencing. Do you actually think any country has unlimited amounts of money and goodwill?
well, lets just hope if we do go to war with iran,
You kill me!
Originally posted by finti
then tell me why they do the death toll keep rising if they have such a bloody control of the situationUS cant do it alone, they need suport and those few who still suported the Iraqi war will not support a new war in the region. Why? because of the stability of the middle east aint stable at all and two many sparks might engulf the entire region into war.
America is just a bully towrds land who hasnt got a great military defence
What would the goals of invading Iran be? Everyone should probably discuss that a little further.
America's goals when invading Iraq were to a. Remove Saddam Hussein from power b. prove he had weapons of mass destruction.
The death toll keeps rising because America is sticking around to reestablish their preference of government in a country that is otherwise left with no government at all. If America stayed in Iran afterwards to establish a democracy...then yes, Iran has the potential to be much worst.
Also, I said that if an invasion happened between the two.....America would have to resort to a draft. In that case....I still stand by my statement that Iran would create little resistance.
America most certainly CAN do it all alone (they have the resources), but they WON'T. As clumsy and stupid as Bush seems, he's really not that stupid. He didn't get the coalition that he wanted, but he got just enough support to spread the blame around. I agree that no one will follow America to another war, and that is one of the main reasons why I don't believe a war will take place.
I hesistate to agree with that last comment, only because the vendetta in Iraq was personal....it was a coincidence that Iraq's military sucked. If they attack Iran...then YES, they are nothing but pathetic bullies....and that will be the day I'm ashamed to be an American. 🙁
Originally posted by WindDancer
There won't be any member bashing here! If I catch anyone bashing another member this thread is getting close. And warnings will be issue.And NO this is not your typical American that sensors other peoples opinions! No bashing means NO bashing!
chill out
i was joking 🙂