Finally, tangible PROOF of MACRO-EVOLUTION

Originally posted by Nellinator
Ok, lets say you are in an auditorium with people randomly dispersed and the roof collapses. However, three people near the door are not killed by falling debris and live to reproduce. Nothing about there genetics contributed to their survival, it was purely chance. That is a bottlenecking effect.

That's true, but that is not a population bottleneck.

If there was only enough food to feed 1/4 of the people in the auditorium, only the strongest and smartest will survive. That would be a bottleneck.

I never said it was a population bottleneck, this is different. Still called a bottleneck sometimes though, the actual name escapes me right now.

EDIT: I looked it up and it is called the bottleneck effect and can be a cause of the founder effect.

Originally posted by Nellinator
I never said it was a population bottleneck, this is different. Still called a bottleneck sometimes though, the actual name escapes me right now.

Ok, when you said bottleneck, I assumed population bottleneck. 😉

Originally posted by Nellinator
Ok, lets say you are in an auditorium with people randomly dispersed and the roof collapses. However, three people near the door are not killed by falling debris and live to reproduce. Nothing about there genetics contributed to their survival, it was purely chance. That is a bottlenecking effect.

Yes, but its not natural selection.

NS requires reproduction. Any sort of cataclysm like this is not actually evolution, however, evolution is drastically altered thereafter.

Originally posted by Alliance
Yes, but its not natural selection.

NS requires reproduction. Any sort of cataclysm like this is not actually evolution, however, evolution is drastically altered thereafter.

I'm so confused...but OK 😛

and psych still sucks 😛

Originally posted by Alliance

and psych still sucks 😛

😠

Sounds like someone is being defensive 😛

Maybe the survivors got really horny because of the adrenaline rush.

Originally posted by Alliance
I'm so confused...but OK 😛

and psych still sucks 😛

Yup. Thems are.

But now you have a friend to attempt to justify physchology with you.

Hehe, psychology is too fun to ignore you know. It affects everything, you can't escape it fear

Or you just percieve that you can't escape it.

😆 are you saying that you are an emotionless robot?

Maybe 😈

Originally posted by Alliance
Or you just percieve that you can't escape it.

hold on...

you say this and you DON'T like psychology

Originally posted by inimalist
hold on...

you say this and you DON'T like psychology

Originally posted by Nellinator
He'll realize it soon enough. He'll convert soon or later...

Hurray for cognitive dissonance!

come to the dark side.....

Originally posted by inimalist
Hurray for cognitive dissonance!

come to the dark side.....

I'm quite comfrotable in real science thank you 😛

Originally posted by inimalist
hold on...

you say this and you DON'T like psychology

🙂

To say that the first cause of creation is a being even more complex than any of its creations is even harder to believe. Did this complexity create itself?