yeah dean, i think its utter bullshit.
the very same people tried destroying the towers the first time like 10 years before. if it was a government conspiracy the job would have been done the first time around. plus, in the first attack, the terrorists attacked it from the base and wanted to topple one building sideways into another, which could have been faaaaaaaar more disasterous. the terrorists didnt care that it collapsed perfectly and were most likely a bit disappointed that they did.
if the government wanted to destroy the towers in 2001, then they wanted to in the first attack. so why would they care to have a controlled demolition in order to save surrounding property and people? why would they not just do the same style attack, pack 3 times more explosives, and be done with it.
it makes no sense. so yes, i call it bullshit
in times of government coverups, i believe the answer is not necessarily the official one or that of the conspiracy theorist...but the one that makes sense. this theory makes absolutely no sense.
Originally posted by dean7879
http://judicial-inc.biz/Madrid_skyscraper.htmthis building has the same kind of structure as the twin towers
it was on fire for two days and it was still standing
👆
Originally posted by PVS
yeah dean, i think its utter bullshit.
the very same people tried destroying the towers the first time like 10 years before. if it was a government conspiracy the job would have been done the first time around. plus, in the first attack, the terrorists attacked it from the base and wanted to topple one building sideways into another, which could have been faaaaaaaar more disasterous. the terrorists didnt care that it collapsed perfectly and were most likely a bit disappointed that they did.if the government wanted to destroy the towers in 2001, then they wanted to in the first attack. so why would they care to have a controlled demolition in order to save surrounding property and people? why would they not just do the same style attack, pack 3 times more explosives, and be done with it.
it makes no sense. so yes, i call it bullshit
in times of government coverups, i believe the answer is not necessarily the official one or that of the conspiracy theorist...but the one that makes sense. this theory makes absolutely no sense.
ya head ay bloody screwed on!
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2005/300305newrevelations.htm
Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia was a rescue worker at 9/11. He joined Alex to discuss how rescuers were prevented from doing their jobs properly, were not protected from harmful asbestos, and how explosives, possibly tactical nukes, brought down the towers..
I'm new, so this forum won't let me post a link. 🙁
There is overwhelming evidence that the official story is BS. Spend some time researching and you will be amazed.
Google terms like:
911 cell phone calls
911 Controlled Demolition
911 ananswered questions
Kean commision conflicts of interest
911 families who refused to take the US payoff
It takes a while, but the truth is important!
Originally posted by PVS
hey deano...i dont believe the official report.
never said i did. i just dont believe this either 😬bad deduction
u dont belive the official event..nor do u believe the conspiracy
whats the truth then? IYO?
i believe one of the two has to be the truth
i think the so called conspiracy theorys have some valid points..sue me