Originally posted by Kento
Depends on ur definition of better. As a character Batman is way better, and smarter.Batman can manage a win but not without a lil help from a whole lot of gadgets, and a little bit of info on Logan. But this is a one on one no belt, and no gadgets helping him out.
well, my definition of " better" is that wolverine is a complicated character, too many mysteries and events that you can add up in his life, from wwII, to weaponx, alha fight, samuria, depertment H, xmen etc, his character has so much story, which makes him more interesting, as for the fighting, i can still see wolverine beating batman with or without his healing factor, yeah!!!, he can still take him down!!!, the main reason behind my jugdement is that what is the point of having a healing factor if you don't get injured, character like batman, spiderman, deardevil don't have healing factor, that is why they usually don't get hit more oftun than wolverine does. if wolverine never had healing factor, then the writer would make him more coursoius of himself and how he can manage not geting hit all the time, the more the healing factor, the more pain and the more he gets ****ed up, same thing goes with invernurablity, but less healing power, less injury. so wolverine is a pain eater, batman is just a butter boy/human/ordinary, he can't take 1/10th of the amount of pain that wolverine as sustained., buttom line is that wolverine would win batman depending on the following conditions;
writer
fans
popularity
acelerated healing factor/regenarative capability
experience/age
fighting skills
ferocity
speed
strength
claws/snikt
berserker rage
attitude
animal keen senses
and most of all wolverine never gives up in a fight, mo fo struggling all the time. "he is the best there is at what he does" and thats kicking ass!!!!