Originally posted by Kosta
Whats quite sad is that you cant just respect the fact that Julie may chose to live by the Bible and doesnt feel thats she has to justify her beliefs to you so that you can go on and on finding every possible thing that could be wrong with the way she thinks. THATS "quite sad"
Originally posted by finti
the sad part refered to the argument used not the person
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If Julie is going to cite The Bible as the reason things such as homosexuality and sex outside of marriage are wrong, she had better be able to defend The Bible.
Originally posted by A4E
*sighs* dumbness 🙄
there is NOTHING wrong with homosexuals being in church nor with them being priests
even though the bible states it's an abomination to God? Oh, yeah. Duh! After all, Catholics are always right, and have every right to change the bible to thier liking. God can't do anything abou it, right? Oh, right. There's that whole "judgement day" thing. 🙄
😐 am i making a point?
FAITH and BELIEF defends the Bible, regardless of what you guys say. Sound familiar? That's because atheists put these same principals into Evolution and The Big Bang. What a ka-winky-dink. the bible and evolution are both 'therories', except in the bible you have to be submissive to god, and [gasp] there's rules?! What an inhumane thing! 😐
i could type all night...
Originally posted by Frosty Beverage
FAITH and BELIEF defends the Bible, regardless of what you guys say. Sound familiar? That's because atheists put these same principals into Evolution and The Big Bang. What a ka-winky-dink. the bible and evolution are both 'therories', except in the bible you have to be submissive to god, and [gasp] there's rules?! What an inhumane thing! 😐i could type all night...
the advantage with this is (for those that have the half brain cell it takes to realise this) that science is not pinned down to stay with their story for over 2000 years while the bible is... and is shown as being so utterly wrong
Originally posted by yerssot
the problem is that science admits it's a theory and that the church states their creationism as the absolute undeniable truththe advantage with this is (for those that have the half brain cell it takes to realise this) that science is not pinned down to stay with their story for over 2000 years while the bible is... and is shown as being so utterly wrong
its like a scale, the bible and the theory of evolution are equal. he faith and belief tips it the bible's way...
THERE IS NO PROOF FOR THE BIBLE, OTHER THAN FEELING THE PRESENCE AND GUIDANCE OF GOD.
NOT ALL CHRISTIANS FEEL THAT PRESENCE, BECAUSENOT ALL CHRISTIANS ARE CHRISTIANS.
NO ONE HAS EVER DISPROOVED THE BIBLE, REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU SAY!
...damn, sorry, i didnt mean to have caps lock on.
that's your opinion, not all of the people who belive in evolution/are atheists/ etcthat the flood story in the bible is inspired by an older tale is not my opinion at all, look into those ancient mythological stories and you will see where the biblical story came from.
I never claimed that all evelutionists are atheist
god gave you the right to belive what you want.man got the brain to create whatever god they wanted
Originally posted by finti
that the flood story in the bible is inspired by an older tale is not my opinion at all, look into those ancient mythological stories and you will see where the biblical story came from.I never claimed that all evelutionists are atheist man got the brain to create whatever god they wanted
i didnt say all athiests bellived in evolution. that's why i put slashes (/) 🙂
god gave man the brain...
explain this:
if we came from monkeys or apes...whatever, then how come there are still monkeys and apes around?
if dogs became whales, then why are there still dogs?
etc etc
why is the sky blue? lol- dont answer that. i already know.
why is it that since history has been written dow, man has never seen a monkey turn into a human?
if we came from monkeys or apes...whatever, then how come there are still monkeys and apes around?because the primates evolved from a different branch, the evolution divided them so that some remained the apes we know today, other spiecies of the primates evolved into humans as we know them today.
if dogs became whales, then why are there still dogs?ehhh dogs became whales? the evolutionists tends to be more in the line of from sea to land not the other way around
why is it that since history has been written dow, man has never seen a monkey turn into a human?because they just share the same ancestors, the human that walks the earth today was superior to all its realtives thust the fact that the other died out. Look at where you find monkeys, you find them in areas that aint too suited for larger gropus of humans to live. Humans tend to need more space so they started drifting around all over the place, why because their numbers increased so that they needed more space