which mutants are omega level??

My side of this debate.

There are no sides, and there is no debate. There's you, and there's everyone else, who think you're functionally retarded.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
There are no sides, and there is no debate. There's you, and there's everyone else, who think you're functionally retarded.

Because I choose to trust what is printed rather then their unconfirmed opinions?

Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
wavey

Less than functionally retarded 😉

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Less than functionally retarded 😉

Originally posted by Starhawk
Because I choose to trust what is printed rather then their unconfirmed opinions?

you choose to fabricate "truth" by interpreting a nebulous reference in one way, and believing that that is the single, solitary way of interpreting it. yours is an unconfirmed opinion as well. if you cant see that, you must, absolutely must, be retarded. i wouldn't go so far as to say functionally retarded, as that implies you can actually function, which i have yet to see proof of.

you tell me where starhawk was confirmed an omega, and where he's manipulating the white hot room, and i'll pick up the issues before i get on the train tomorrow. give me issue numbers. i'll waste my money to prove you wrong. how's that?

Once again, when your backed into a corner, you just insult. It's kinda sad.

Originally posted by Disappear
you choose to fabricate "truth" by interpreting a nebulous reference in one way, and believing that that is the single, solitary way of interpreting it. yours is an unconfirmed opinion as well. if you cant see that, you must, absolutely must, be retarded. i wouldn't go so far as to say functionally retarded, as that implies you can actually function, which i have yet to see proof of.

you tell me where starhawk was confirmed an omega, and where he's manipulating the white hot room, and i'll pick up the issues before i get on the train tomorrow. give me issue numbers. i'll waste my money to prove you wrong. how's that?

It's the last 3 issues of the run. I am getting them scanned tomorrow.

Mine is confirmed, it's in print in the comics. That makes it fact until Marvel officially retcons it.

Also I think it's worthy to note that you guys have taken an issue over a comic personally, whereas I have not.

it's not my issue with the comic that keeps me posting in this back asswards thread. it's my vain attempt to pressure a little nugget on common sense, deductive reasoning and basic logic into that lumpy block sitting on your shoulders.

you can repeat that your opinion is rooted in fact as many times as you care to. that doesn't change the fact that it is an unsubstantiated opinion; something you've professed to be nonsense and irrelevant.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Once again, when your backed into a corner, you just insult. It's kinda sad.

also, look up the definition of corner. you've said the same dribbling nonsense for at least ten pages now, and you can't change the fact that it's not fact. i'd hardly consider smacking my head against a wall "being back into a corner;" and that's basically all i've been doing trying to make a point.

No it's in print, whereas yours is not.

yours is in print, but OUT OF context.

OJ wrote a book called "if i did it." the words "i did it" are right there in the title, but that doesn't constitute a confession. can you wrap your head around that concept?

Show on panel the word "omega" applied to Starsquawk in the context attributed to it in X-Men Forever in 2001. 313

Rhetorical question because despite all your yip yapping, Yip-Yap, I know you have none.

Originally posted by Disappear
yours is in print, but OUT OF context.

OJ wrote a book called "if i did it." the words "i did it" are right there in the title, but that doesn't constitute a confession. can you wrap your head around that concept?

Only Marvel can say if it is out of context, not you.

and only marvel can say its IN context, not you. and they haven't. either way. so we're forced to resort to common sense in the meantime. and i've got that by the assload, sherlock.

The fact that it's printed 15 years before the context you're trying to apply to it was established, and written by a different writer, makes it out of context. For ****'s sake, you must actually be retarded.

Originally posted by Disappear
and only marvel can say its IN context, not you. and they haven't. either way. so we're forced to resort to common sense in the meantime. and i've got that by the assload, sherlock.

Putting it in the comic and identifying her as an Omega is all the context required. Sorry your opinion is just not good enough in the face of facts.

What about Jaspers?

Jaspers, regardless of how powerful he was, isn't an Omega mutant. He's never been labelled one.

[sarcasm]While Omega Red is clearly an Omega mutant, because look they call him Omega Red.[/sarcasm]

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Jaspers, regardless of how powerful he was, isn't an Omega mutant. He's never been labelled one.

[sarcasm]While Omega Red is clearly an Omega mutant, because look they call him Omega Red.[/sarcasm]

Jaspers probably should be made Omega IMO since he has almost every aspect of an Omega already.