which mutants are omega level??

It was never referred to as such until Grant Morrison afaik. Reprint constitutes a retcon. Feel free to show a scan of Starsquawk entering the "White Hot Room" referred to as such specifically. Still doesn't make Starsquawk an Omega. ermmhappy

Nonsense. Like a word being used in 1986, alluding to a meaning applied in 2001. Nonsense like that?

Now your just embarrassed by your lack of knowledge. And yes it was in Guardians referred to as well.

You really aren't showing off your comic knowledge, assuming you have some.

AFAIK = As far as I know = disclaimer not claiming absolute knowledge = you're a moron.

Alpha is nothing to be ashamed of... take into consideration that ppl like magneto, jacob, exodus, apocalypse, storm wanda(tho a case of omega could be made for her and storm) cable and stryfe are alphas and they are among the most powerful. in fact they are either just as or slightly more powerful than some who are confirmed, so strangely it's not so much a big deal to me

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
AFAIK = As far as I know = disclaimer not claiming absolute knowledge = you're a moron.

I will give you that on your first mistake , but on your second one you never said that, you just made a statement you had no real idea about off the top of your head. Kinda hurts your credibility.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
It was never referred to as such until Grant Morrison afaik.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
The White Hot Room wasn't around in the mid-90s afaik. ermmhappy

It's a Yip-Yap. Gotta Catch 'em All.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I think my credibility is fine Mr Law Student. ermmhappy

Last edited by xmarksthespot on Today at 10:57 PM

Anyone can edit their statements after being proven wrong, nice try though.

I added this:
Feel free to show a scan of Starsquawk entering the "White Hot Room" referred to as such specifically.
and this:
Nonsense. Like a word being used in 1986, alluding to a meaning applied in 2001. Nonsense like that?

😐

Originally posted by Starhawk
Last edited by xmarksthespot on Today at 10:57 PM

Anyone can edit their statements after being proven wrong, nice try though.

😐

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I added this:
Feel free to show a scan of Starsquawk entering the "White Hot Room" referred to as such specifically.
and this:
Nonsense. Like a word being used in 1986, alluding to a meaning applied in 2001. Nonsense like that?

😐

Sure, if thats what you need to believe, the fact is you've been proven wrong twice within the last 2 pages, not good.

Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
I quoted X long before that edit... and it still said afaik.

😐

Then where is that quote?

Does it matter???
Starhawk ain't no omega.

Iff he is proof it.

I am going to. And yes it does matter, one has made 2 mistakes while trying to sound like an expert and the other outright lied. I am not placing any credibility in either of them.

😐 Half the people here have you on ignore, the other half think you're a retard. Spunky didn't lie and both my "mistakes" were afaiks anyway.

The White Hot Room as it's currently known is a Morrison-X-Men derived concept afaik. GalacticStorm would know better since he follows all things Phoenix. If there's anything originally printed pre-New X-Men #154 that referred specifically to the "White Hot Room" I hadn't heard of it and will happily see.

Still doesn't make Starhawk an Omega. 😐

Well in that case, if you lack the knowledge stay out of the debate.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Then where is that quote?

Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
By the manner that X quoted them, I assumed you meant the one that I did quote... either way, thats hardly basis to be called a liar... someone seems a little edgy tonight. Do you always resort to insults once you start losing a debate? 🙂

He hasn't really provided evidence that people have asked him for so I don't think he's really been debating.

Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
By the manner that X quoted them, I assumed you meant the one that I did quote... either way, thats hardly basis to be called a liar... someone seems a little edgy tonight. Do you always resort to insults once you start losing a debate? 🙂

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
He hasn't really provided evidence that people have asked him for so I don't think he's really been debating.

Yeah your right, still waiting for that proof.

Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
By the manner that X quoted them, I assumed you meant the one that I did quote... either way, thats hardly basis to be called a liar... someone seems a little edgy tonight. Do you always resort to insults once you start losing a debate? 🙂

I'm not losing, my arguement is based on facts out of the comics, and X is hardly presenting a strong case after getting multiple facts wrong.