Can You Change Reality?

Started by DigiMark0078 pages

Originally posted by debbiejo
Have you ever noticed that negative things happen to angry people. Have you ever noticed how terrible things happen to people who are fearful. Have you ever noticed that sick people were always worried about becoming sick?

Of course there are other factors involved, I never said it does not. Only that we do have some control on what we bring into our environment and into our lives. I for one have experienced these things and even before this, I had wondered why certain things happened to others with strong attitudes. Attitudes are strong thoughts.

I cannot say that this is the all in all, but it seems that it DOES contribute.

People think of themselves as "body" but what some sciences tell us that we are sub atomic particles that extends body into something much larger and effects everything around us that we see as invisible.

To an extent, sure. Like I said, a defeatist attitude won't get you as far as a confident one.

But as for the "have you ever..." questions, a lot of the time it is probably the reverse. A person who has had horrible stuff happen to them will tend to be angry. A person who is sick a lot (from natural causes) will naturally be preoccupied with sickness. But it's the environment effecting the person, not vice-versa. And implying that we can, with relative success, alter our environments via emotions is dangerously misleading people without anything even close to proper evidence.

It could also likely be a case where, say, an angry person pronounces their misfortune more obviously...to the point where it's impossible not to notice it. The anger seems to beget the bad events, when in fact good and bad things happen to everyone...the angry or sad person just perceives more happening to them, and thus their disposition.

...

It's not totally without merit. I just think you're overplaying the case for it a ton, and also taking it into paranormal realms where it has no business belonging.

....

Also, for anyone sceptical of this kind of phenomenon, please read my analysis on the last page, since I think it's important when it comes to this subject, and largely debunks it as a pseudo-scientific theory.

And you/we/everyone knows all aspects to what we call being human and the capabilities of what that is??

I understand that this is a truth, but maybe only one truth because there could never be an understanding of what is causing all things and to what effect. To not include paranormal is as bad as saying we know it all when infact we don't.

Originally posted by debbiejo
And you/we/everyone knows all aspects to what we call being human and the capabilities of what that is??

I understand that this is a truth, but maybe only one truth because there could never be an understand of what is causing all things and to what effect.

You're just implying a gap in scientific knowledge of causal effects for any one particular situation. Valid on the surface, because no one can tell you that you're wrong, and it would take an astronomically impossible calculation to actually figure out all the determining factors of an event or scenario.

But the problem is that you're taking that gap and instead of inserting something equally as valid, you're making the jump to a paranormal idea without any sort of logical backing.

I have no problem accepting that there are things about humans, nature, causality, etc. that I don't understnad, or that no one understands. But something shouldn't be taken as fact or even as a possible explanation if it has no evidence to support it other than intuition and perceived links between thoughts and effects, most of which I discussed back on page 3.

I hate to say this, but this reminds me a lot of the arguments ID advocates use when trying to debunk evolution. They're great at showing where evolution has holes of information (which do still exist, though many are quickly closing), but inserts an irrational Creator into those rather than offering another plausible explanation. It might have intuitive and/or emotional appeal for believers (as might the law of attraction), but it in no way serves as an empirical explanation that is testable.

I'm not a materialist, so I'm not denying paranormal phenomenon altogether. But I am denying those for which we have no good reason to believe in, until there is evidence to suggest otherwise that isn't so blatently subjective.

Well I will not submit myself into a box that others create. Even to say that evolution and creation (not the bible kind) cannot be somewhat blended is kind of staunch...don't you think? Do we know all the answers? OR could there also be another probability that just hasn't been discovered/proved yet. It's called scientific theory. It's just now coming to light. As for me, I take it as my life dictates it and that's all.

I do know that the fundamental beliefs of many scientist such as Astronaut Edgar Mitchell was on to something and from that others branched off. He did experiments from space with NASA not knowing. I gave the link earlier. Now he's not some dumb ass you know. He founded a whole organization of studies about this kind of phenomenon. I'll go with that and other studies, but not just that, because I am sceptical. I keep journals and my own experiments on things....I guess to say to each their own. I can say that we just will NEVER understand all things. And to say we do is us being pompous, ignorant just like every other century.

*Throws Galileo in jail*

Originally posted by debbiejo
I can say that we just will NEVER understand all things. And to say we do is us being pompous, ignorant just like every other century.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
I have no problem accepting that there are things about humans, nature, causality, etc. that I don't understnad, or that no one understands.

Meh.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
But something shouldn't be taken as fact or even as a possible explanation if it has no evidence to support it other than intuition and perceived links between thoughts and effects, most of which I discussed back on page 3.

...

In any case, we seem to have reached an impasse. I'll read the stuff from the link you posted. I honestly doubt I'll find further evidence, but I certainly won't close myself to the possibility....I didn't come into this inherently biased against it and unknowledgeable. It just seems like my refutations, both in my reading and in this thread, were only met by subjective anecdotal evidence, so I felt obligated to refute it until something more concrete presents itself (if it does, let me know, and I'd be interested).

We seem to have both gotten a touch more snippy in the last couple posts, so my apologies for that dj.

No, I don't mean to be snippy there Digi. 😊

I've always respected your posts, ....that's why you are on my buddy list! Yeah, you have been from a long time ago....lol

I enjoy the dialogue, Mr. mod.....lol

Good good. I'm glad we're ok.

...you're still wrong though.

😛

No, you! 🙄

Re: Can You Change Reality?

Originally posted by debbiejo
Can you change your reality???

Have you ever noticed that when you are in a great mood, that everything seems to go your way? You get great parking spots, or things just seem to fall into your lap.

And when you're in a crappy mood, depressed, angry, resentful, unforgiving, that things only get worse?

It's called the "Law of Attraction." You attract what you put out with your thoughts, and then it becomes a reality. It's also referred to as "Holographic Time. or Quantum Thinking."

I've noticed this principle...Have you?

No. ...can only change your "own" reality. i.e. environment around you...people you choose to associate with, where you choose to work, who you choose to love, etc, etc.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Subjective reality doesn't mean we can actively influence it remotely via thoughts and emotions. All it means is that we create our inward perception of it. The meaning that we ascribe to it is our own, but not the actual machinations of it.

I'll be honest deb: I know you probably end up a lot happier because of this idea, and also probably do a fair amount of good as a result, but the idea itself is dangerous when taken to such extremes.

As evidence, I'll be paraphrasing Ingrid Hansen Smythe's scathing review of "The Secret", a "power of attraction" book that sounds a lot like what you're espousing....as well as inserting my own thoughts.

[b]Limits of Attraction:

Imagine a scenario where a young girl is raped, chopped to pieces, thrown into a trashbag in those pieces, burned, then cast aside. Brutal, no? And the obvious question is: Did she attract that to herself via her thoughts and feelings?

No. Of course not. I doubt you'd say so, and no rational person would. But let's get more nuanced. The everyday occurences that happen to people, good, bad, or even neutral. Are those attracted? Possibly, under the theory. But where draw the line? There isn't one. And does a person only attract things (positive or negative) if they are conscious that they should attract it?

And even in the brutal example of the girl, why throw it out so casually as a refutation? If I can influence a bee via positive thoughts, or a person can bring woe upon themselves by thinking negatively, how is it that we can discard the example of the girl? The answer is, we can't. Saying that she didn't deserve it or that her thoughts had nothing to do with it seems like a monkey wrench in the theory, which has no testable basis on rational grounds anyway.

Coincidences:

We all have at least 1 (probably more) stories of coincidences. This is extremely common. Hundreds of thousands of coincidences happen on a daily basis, made into a rather bland fact by the sheer power of probability, the number of people on the planet, and the staggering number of tasks we complete each day and thoughts that race through our head...each of which is a potential for a coincidence, possibly a very large one. And we are programmed by evolution to be pattern-seeking individuals. We find the coincidences.

And we remember the hits, but not the misses. If a person dreamed of an old friend, woke up the next morning and found out he was dead, it would be hard to convince him that something paranormal didn't occur. Nobody recounts the billions of deaths that went unnoticed in dreams, even of close friends and relatives. But if it happens to one person, say in England next week, my guess is that the newspapers or tv stations will pick it up on a slow day, and a good chunk of the population of England will hear about it (if only as a flippant paragraph or two deep within a newspaper), thus reinforcing the general belief. Then we have media outlets (Chicken Soup for the New Age Soul?) dedicated to perpetuating ideas like this. The odds of such a thing happening are actually very possible, but we only realize it if we take the time to think about it.

Now, combine all that with a person who buys into this system of attraction. Now, more than ever, the person is acutely cognizant of the patterns around them, of the relationships between one action and a subsequent consequence, of the power they have over their lives. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, not simply a reasonable assessment of the world.

"Quantum Thinking":

You alluded to it in your opening post, so my guess is that you're referring to observer-based occurences within quantum mechanics. The idea is actually rather silly. The myth is that reality cannot exist without mind, that we aren't just observing reality but influencing it by the very act of observation. This has remained urban myth among laypeople with a cursory understanding of the theory.

The more elegant reality of the situation is simply that quantum states are notoriously hard to maintain, and that any influence is liable to collapse it. Basically, in any situation where an observer CAN observe a quantum state (say, shedding light on the interaction so as to record it), the quantum state is compromised (in the case of the light, the photons would disrupt the system).

Concessions:
I'm not attacking debbie (who I like as a forum member and respect). I simply felt obligated to talk about something that I see as little more than pseudo-science that panders to our sense of wonder, without taking into account a more logical approach to the idea.

Self-fulfilling prophecies occur. If you are convinced you won't do something, chances are you won't (and yours odds improve with a similarly positive outlook). But be very, very careful how far you take it, and also what kinds of justifications you use to support it.

...

P.S. I play my best golf when I'm angry as hell. The kind of anger that turns into rage, and it hones it into a focus...but at that point I can't even feel happy for the good shots. Whatever I'm angry about transcends it. I suppose I shouldn't try that though when it's raining...I might call down lightning on myself ( 🙄 ) [/B]

You have very good points. But there seems to be aspects of the Law of Attraction that you do not understand.

1) You can't change someone else's reality, only your own. Another person's experiences are thier own responsibility.

2) The Law of Attraction doesn't give people what they deserve. It's not about good or evil, or judgement, or anything like that. It's pure cause and effect.

According to the Law, you attract to you what goes through your mind. The things you fear, love, hate, focus on, are the things you bring into your life through your actions and interactions with the environment and other people.

The girl who got chopped up....what was her life like before that ? How has her mentality always been ? Has she ever had a concentrated fear of being killed ?

Did she demand attention ? Did she commonly find herself in all the wrong places ? Where was she the time she got kidnapped ? Killed ? Who does she hang out with ?

Whenever a person is raped or murdered, others will say They were at the wrong place at the wrong time. As if it was something that happened out of no where, with no causes, just something that happened that no one had any control over.

If I walk down a dark street at midnight and am attacked, ofcourse it's not my fault I was attacked. However, why am I walking down this street at midnight ?

Or let's just say someone gets hit by a car walking in broad crowded day light...well....one can say that it was a total accident, it happened by CHANCE, that its something unfortunate that no one has any control over.

Well....I chose to cross that street, at that time. My choice to walk that street at that time is the result of a series of choices I made before. Cause and Effect.

The driver chose to drive in that street and not drive carefully.

Two people are responsible for this accident. They both committed the actions, they both created this experience.

***********************************************************

Think about it for a second:

Have you ever spoken to a devout Christian who swears that he or she has seen miracles ? Who swears by the power of God ? Even to the Death?

Well...there's a reason for that.

Good things have come into thier life. Thier beleif in God became so powerful, that they expected good things to happen. They may have not sorted out what they wanted, but they expected pleasure and peace to come from thier prayer and Faith.

They attracted good things through thier beleif, then attribute it to thier God. They then beleive even more, and in turn, more good things start to happen, reinforcing their beleif even further.

Buddhists, Muslims, and Hindus will ALSO claim good things have happened to them and thier loved ones because of thier beleifs.

It all comes down to this: Reality is different for everyone. My reality is simply the series of thoughts, emotions, and experiences I have. If a person I don't know dies, it has no bearing on my reality. It's not part of it, because I am not even aware of it, therefore my choices, actions, thoughts, and feelings are not affected.

My reality is different from yours. Anything bad that happens to me today, or any other day, is the result of my thoughts, emotions, and actions of the past.

Sick people who dwell on thier sickness make themself sicker.

If you google carefully, you will see that there are people ALL OVER THE WORLD who have cured themselves of diseases such as Cancer and even HIV !

Through beleif, through meditation, through healthy habits, through different mentality in conjuction with thier medications and treatments. Sometimes, even without.

Your brain has authority over every cell in your body. Remember that.

The only way to control your life is to control your mind first. You learn to control your mind through meditation and practice. Once you take full control of your mind, the rest of your life follows.

Noted SoD, and your counter-points seem fairly conservative compared to some of the more outlandish claims of the Law of Attraction, so I don't object to it in full.

But basically what you are describing is simply causal determinism. Yes, everything has a prior cause, or many prior causes. Saying that our thoughts help shape our life is nearly an "a priori" (sic?) argument. Of course they do, because our actions flow from them. So yes, a person who, through whatever machinations, is in certain situations is likely to feel the consequences of those situations (positive or negative).

My argument has always been that we're not somehow attracting positive events via our thoughts in a paranormal manner. If I think negatively about a bee escaping my room, and he doesn't, then do the opposite and he does, it's merely a fairly probable coincidence....not a supernatural influence.

On a more mundane level, confidence begets success, trepidation begets failure. Positive thoughts will lead to a better outlook on life, and probably the general feeling that life is better as a result of the outlook...but it is simply our perceptions and meanings that make it better, not a direct causal influence from feelings to events in the world.

...

Also, my example with the girl was a neutral setting meant to imply that it happened seemingly at random. She didn't "think negatively" nor was she in a place designed to attract bad situations. For the sake of the argument, she could've been at home watching Barney while eating ice cream and laughing. It was merely to say that she didn't attract the brutality through any paranormal means. It was merely an unfortunate thing that happened to her. Then, by comparison, show why that implies that NO events are attracted in such a manner.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Noted SoD, and your counter-points seem fairly conservative compared to some of the more outlandish claims of the Law of Attraction, so I don't object to it in full.

I do beleive in The Law of Attraction very much so. It makes a lot of sense in many of the areas of my life, which I can apply it to. If I told you several of the things that happened to me, that I experienced, I'd bet you wouldn't beleive me.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
But basically what you are describing is simply causal determinism. Yes, everything has a prior cause, or many prior causes. Saying that our thoughts help shape our life is nearly an "a priori" (sic?) argument. Of course they do, because our actions flow from them. So yes, a person who, through whatever machinations, is in certain situations is likely to feel the consequences of those situations (positive or negative).

Thoughts and emotions shape our actions. Everyone understands that.

But to go even further, thoughts and emotions also shape our experiences. And that's all Reality is.

When we say Reality we aren't talking about the Universe. There is no way the entire Universe will be changed because of one mind. Reality is not the objective Universe. We can't even truly comprehend the objective Universe.

There are hundreds of colors that exist that we cannot see. There are sounds and frequencies we cannot hear, and there are energies we cannot feel.

Our perception and experience with the rest of the Universe is our Reality.

Reality is nothing more than the duration of your experiences. Like I said before, if someone in another country dies, and I don't hear about it, It will never be part of my reality. My reality is what happens to me, and your reality is what happens to you.

So yes, simply put, you can change your reality.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
My argument has always been that we're not somehow attracting positive events via our thoughts in a paranormal manner. If I think negatively about a bee escaping my room, and he doesn't, then do the opposite and he does, it's merely a fairly probable coincidence....not a supernatural influence.

You can't control another life form with your mind. I can't command a bee or fly to leave my room. You can only command yourself. If the bee is there, it's drawn there because of you. You left the window open, you ate a certain food which gives off a scent, etc. What the Bee does afterwards is its choice, and what you do afterwards is your choice.

Think about this: I will tell you something personal, something that occured this year.

Because of my experiences, throughout the year I thought about Heartbreak. Don't really know why, went through a horrible one in the summer of 2004, then another one in 2006, so I kept thinking about other guys hurting my feelings.

This summer I had hook ups with 15 different guys. Two of them I liked very much. Both of them broke my heart. One of them was this guy who said he wanted to get to know me afterward, but when I called him he asked "who is this ?"- mind you, we exchanged numbers before. The other guy was someone I was dating, but because he was so afraid of his parents finding out he was Gay, he couldn't spend enough time with me freely, so I ended that as well.

I basically met the same kind of guys over and over.

I began to beleive that Life is unfair, and that I can't trust guys at all. I told myself that no matter how hard I try to make things work, it always goes wrong, and that guys, for whatever reason, take advantage of me and never meet up to my standards.

What I realized is that, I'm the one who drew those guys to my life. Through my thoughts, emotions, and actions.

I always thought that each guy I was with may hurt me in some way...and they did. I kept feeling sorry for myself, and in doing so, gave myself more reason to feel sorry.

My actions reinforced these experiences. Every single date I went on (few dates, btw) I had sex the first date. Then I expected the guy to stay with me afterward. I felt that in doing so, I would have the guy hooked, and show that I'm willing to do anything to show the guy how much I like him.

I didn't realize that I was giving myself to easily, and drawing those kind of guys who want the easy way.

Now, knowing what happened, whose fault would you say it was ? Whose responsible ? Did I just happen to meet all the wrong guys by coincidense, or did I somehow bring this upon myself ?

Be Honest.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
On a more mundane level, confidence begets success, trepidation begets failure. Positive thoughts will lead to a better outlook on life, and probably the general feeling that life is better as a result of the outlook...but it is simply our perceptions and meanings that make it better, not a direct causal influence from feelings to events in the world.

All Reality is - are you experiences. Your experiences are shaped by your outlook, thoughts, emotions, choices, and actions. You are fully responsible for your own happiness, and your experiences.

...

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Also, my example with the girl was a neutral setting meant to imply that it happened seemingly at random. She didn't "think negatively" nor was she in a place designed to attract bad situations. For the sake of the argument, she could've been at home watching Barney while eating ice cream and laughing. It was merely to say that she didn't attract the brutality through any paranormal means. It was merely an unfortunate thing that happened to her. Then, by comparison, show why that implies that NO events are attracted in such a manner.

There's nothing paranormal about it.

How old is the girl ? I don't yet quite beleive that a young child who has not much experience can take control of her entire life.

At the same time, many adults have no control of thier own lives either. But that's because they don't take it.

If the girl is a teenager, then the experience is different. How many of us think about violence ? or think about bad things ? We all do. Yet, we can repel those things as well.

I beleive, that when it comes to children, parents are responsible, not the child. The mind of a child is loose and undeveloped, therefore there is no way they can take control of thier experiences.

Also, the Law of Attraction works both ways. The child may have no attracted the serial killer to her, but the serial killer certainly attracted him or herself to the child.

Victims will attract victimizers. Victimizers will attract victims. This is not about being good or evil, or about getting what you deserve. This has nothing to do with that.

This is about attraction. The serial killer thinks about his or her prey how often ? ALL THE TIME. The more he or she thinks about the victim, the closer his or her pull to the victim becomes.

The child cannot be held responsible, as a child's mind is virgin in nature, and has very little power (over life experience).

The serial killer is responsible, because he or she attracted the child into his or her life. Understand ?

SoD, you're trying to skirt around the point I'm trying to make. I get the idea of subjective reality (which is what you described), as well as causality, and agree wholeheartedly.

In your example of the guys, nothing supernatural was occuring. Yes, I agree with your point of view, but only in so far as your thoughts and actions helped to determine the situations in life (in that case, the guys you ended up with). There's nothing mystical in that....it's just cause and effect.

But in calling it the "Law..." instead of more coherent ideas like causality and subjective reality, which have their basis in logical footing, it opens the door to those who actually think you CAN do things such as, say, get a new bike just by thinking about it really hard, then waiting for the universe to align to get one for you...or mystically influence the bee like in the scenario that was brought up earlier.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
SoD, you're trying to skirt around the point I'm trying to make. I get the idea of subjective reality (which is what you described), as well as causality, and agree wholeheartedly.

Okay.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
In your example of the guys, nothing supernatural was occuring. Yes, I agree with your point of view, but only in so far as your thoughts and actions helped to determine the situations in life (in that case, the guys you ended up with). There's nothing mystical in that....it's just cause and effect.

I never said it was anything supernatural. The Law of Attraction is not supernatural, the same way Gravity and Magnetism are not supernatural.

And that's exactly what I am saying. Cause and Effect. I'm not attaching any magic or occult to my point. I never said the Law of Attraction was mystical.

I feel as though you haven't actually been reading what I've been writing.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
But in calling it the "Law..." instead of more coherent ideas like causality and subjective reality, which have their basis in logical footing, it opens the door to those who actually think you CAN do things such as, say, get a new bike just by thinking about it really hard, then waiting for the universe to align to get one for you...or mystically influence the bee like in the scenario that was brought up earlier.

You obviously don't understand that Law of Attraction. It's not about a magic trick or some kind of mutant ability to levitate objects or control the mind of another.

You didn't read what I posted before. If you had, you would have seen how I put down the Bee scenario, because the Law of Attraction doesn't give you the power to hypnotize or influence a Bee. If the bee was in your room, it's because you opened the window. Your actions (as well as your thoughts and emotions) draw things to you. You can't tell the bee to leave. What it does next is its own choice.

As for the Bike...it's not about thinking really hard. If all you think about is a new bike, you will eventually get it. Your actions will lead you to get that bike.

It's like with Bodybuilding. Ask any professional Bodybuilder, they will tell you 90% of bodybuilding is mental.

Ask any entrepenuer, or any motivated businessman or woman, they will tell you that the secret to gaining so much financial wealth is to ALWAYS think about money. Have you ever read any of those books?

They all say the same thing. Step ONE is to always think about money, LOVE IT, TREASURE IT, Treat it like GOLD. Respect it, and focus on money, make yourself and your mind in sync with money.

Beggars have gotten themselves out of poverty. In NY there are so many people I have spoken to, some were once poor beggars, and there were days when they acquired $100.00 or even more, and put that money to use, simply by focusing on money, instead of on focusing on thier pain and self pity.

There are testimonies of people all over the world who have cured themselves of Cancer and HIV, through meditation, practice, healthy habits-which includes medical responsibility, and focus. Look online, see for yourself. Even Men's Health magazine has confirmed with interviews.

I do not understand the Law of Attraction to a full science, but one day I will. As of now, it makes perfect sense to me.

Not to get Off Topic but in regard to the Law of Attraction, and Positive Thinking combatting diseases such as HIV, this link is a link to a skeptical website which questions the role of positive mentality in the treatment of disease, yet even admits how much of an effect positive thinking has on the body and immune system as well as symptons:

http://www.lifepositive.com/Body/body-holistic/AIDS/treatment-of-hiv.asp

Originally posted by DigiMark007
...But in calling it the "Law..." instead of more coherent ideas like causality and subjective reality, which have their basis in logical footing, it opens the door to those who actually think you CAN do things such as, say, get a new bike just by thinking about it really hard, then waiting for the universe to align to get one for you...or mystically influence the bee like in the scenario that was brought up earlier.

However, "rightful thinking leads to rightful actions, and wrongful thinking leads to wrongful thinking". Even though this quote is a little off your point, it still shows the connection between thought and actions. Therefore, if you think about getting a new bike, a new bike will not magically appear, but your thoughts will guide your actions and you may go down to the store and buy a new bike. In that sense, thinking about a new bike does lead to a new bike.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
However, "rightful thinking leads to rightful actions, and wrongful thinking leads to wrongful thinking". Even though this quote is a little off your point, it still shows the connection between thought and actions. Therefore, if you think about getting a new bike, a new bike will not magically appear, but your thoughts will guide your actions and you may go down to the store and buy a new bike. In that sense, thinking about a new bike does lead to a new bike.

He doesn't understand the Law. The Law essentially states that thoughts/emotions and actions are what shape experience.

It's not magic or mysticism. The thought is energy and has its own frequency. Long ago, I told you that my thoughts meant nothing, because my thoughts have little to no power over my initiative actions. I was wrong. They totally have power over my actions and experience.

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
He doesn't understand the Law. The Law essentially states that thoughts/emotions and actions are what shape experience.

It's not magic or mysticism. The [b]thought is energy and has its own frequency. Long ago, I told you that my thoughts meant nothing, because my thoughts have little to no power over my initiative actions. I was wrong. They totally have power over my actions and experience. [/B]

If I remember correctly, we had quite an argument over that. I'm glad you have come around. However, the Law of Attraction should not be confused with the Mystic Law. The Law of Attraction is a western attempt to explain a phenomenon of nature that the Buddhists have known about for a long time.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If I remember correctly, we had quite an argument over that. I'm glad you have come around. However, the Law of Attraction should not be confused with the Mystic Law. The Law of Attraction is a western attempt to explain a phenomenon of nature that the Buddhists have known about for a long time.

Mystic Law says that the true nature of the Universe cannot be known to us, because of the limitation our senses.

As far as I understand, thoughts/emotions/actions and interactions with the external influences are all we have of our reality. Our life and our reality is basically our series of experiences.

Law of Attraction claims that we are like magnets. We attract like frequencies through our thoughts, emotions, and actions. Likewise, actions and interactions influence our thoughts and emotions, which perpetuates a cycle of experience. We have the power to control our life through taking control of our mind first.

There are many similiarities.

In the end, I beleive Quality of Life is all that really matters. Why live a miserable truth when you can live a beautiful lie ?

Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
[b]Mystic Law says that the true nature of the Universe cannot be known to us, because of the limitation our senses.

As far as I understand, thoughts/emotions/actions and interactions with the external influences are all we have of our reality. Our life and our reality is basically our series of experiences.

Law of Attraction claims that we are like magnets. We attract like frequencies through our thoughts, emotions, and actions. Likewise, actions and interactions influence our thoughts and emotions, which perpetuates a cycle of experience. We have the power to control our life through taking control of our mind first.

There are many similiarities.

In the end, I beleive Quality of Life is all that really matters. Why live a miserable truth when you can live a beautiful lie ? [/B]

The main difference is that the Mystic Law is inward flowing and the Law of Attraction is outward flowing.

Inward flowing = realizing that all of your reality is from within.

Outward flowing = looks outside of yourself.