Originally posted by Lightsnake
They killed two Leviathans, creatures much stronger than a Sith Wyrm.And a Sith Wyrm is capable of using powers to a Jedi level. Yep.
oh are you referring to Kyp Durron when he did something with lightning? And since when is a leviathan is more powerful than a sith wyrm? Or are you making more stuff up?
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Since a Leviathan is the most powerful of all Sithspawn?
I'm referring to the Padawans running circles around the Leviathan, btw
Prove a leviathan is more powerful than a sith wyrm.
And how many padawans did it take to defeat a leviathan?
And finally, a blast that destroys a sith wyrm or a Massassi temple will most definitely take out a Jedi.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
Sure: a Leviathan is outright called the strongest of Sithspawn.And it took around 6 Padawans to stop a Sith Wyrm.
And finally, a Jedi is capable of defending himself.
1. Source?
2. Wow, 6 padawans. While Kun did it with 1 amulet blast. Thanks for proving my point.
3. Sorry, but a Massassi Temple and Sith Wyrm are both more powerful than a Jedi. Unless of course you think Jedi have superman bodies.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
1. Dark side sourcebook, I believe.
2. Six padawans= the mighty ancient Sith's weapons and the Dark Lord of the Sith?
3. Prove it. A massassi temple is just stone and Sith Wyrm is a giant monster that most Jedi would kill easily. See, JEdi can use the force and defend themselves. Wow
1. You believe, that works. Or not.
2. Since when is a sith wyrm=DLOTS=ancient sith? They're just creations. Since when did the ancient sith create anything equal to them? NIIIIIICE argument lightsnake.
3. Stone>Jedi body... Sith Wyrm>Jedi body.
Most jedi will kill easily? Right. Thanks for the speculation.
1. Why don't you get off your ass and read a bit then?
And you haven't answered: Six padawans equal the Dark Lord of the Sith?
Stone can't use the force. Neither can a Sith wyrm, what part of this are you not getting?
Umm, yeah. Most Jedi would kill a Sith wyrm with ease. a few acrobatics, get on it's head, stab with saber. fight over.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
1. Why don't you get off your ass and read a bit then?
And you haven't answered: Six padawans equal the Dark Lord of the Sith?
Stone can't use the force. Neither can a Sith wyrm, what part of this are you not getting?
Umm, yeah. Most Jedi would kill a Sith wyrm with ease. a few acrobatics, get on it's head, stab with saber. fight over.
1. Why don't you provide real sources, not what you think, since the burden of proof is on you.
And you still don't get it. Unless a sith wyrm=DLOTS, then your argument fails again. I don't even understand your ridiculous comparison as it makes no sense.
Force lightning burns people amulet blast(blast of energy), makes holes in anything it hits. What part are YOU not getting. How do jedi block something that increases with rage?
About your speculation of killing a sith wyrm, I'll let you figure that out yourself, no point even to respond to it.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
I gave you the source: Dark Side sourcebook.
Once again: Kun is being crushed until he gets the amulet. Seems self explanatory.
Prove it's unblockable, please.
And in Kun had his saber and the force at that point, he'd have killed the Wyrm. Easily
1. You said "you believe", so you could be sending me out on a search that will waste precious time. The burden of proof is on you as usual, so provide the quote or shut up.
2. Kun isn't a DLOTS, nor has he learned anything prior to being crushed by the sith wyrm, case destroyed.
2. Prove it's unblockable? LOL.. "Prove that it can't be blocked". Which logical fallacy is that lightsnake, i'll let you figure it out, especially since you seem to claim that it CAN be blocked.
More speculation. Yet another piss poor argument.
1. Because that's where I believe it is. The quote, btw, is "They created the Leviathans, the mightiest of all Sithspawn.' In the 100 Years war.
2. He's not? Huh. Odd. Someone better tell KJA
3. Nope, sorry. Prove it's unblockable. Saying 'prove it cannot be blocked' is negative proof, but unblockable is rather neutral. Whoops.
Originally posted by Lightsnake
1. Because that's where I believe it is. The quote, btw, is "They created the Leviathans, the mightiest of all Sithspawn.' In the 100 Years war.
2. He's not? Huh. Odd. Someone better tell KJA
3. Nope, sorry. Prove it's unblockable. Saying 'prove it cannot be blocked' is negative proof, but unblockable is rather neutral. Whoops.
1. Assuming the best case scenario for you, since it's written chronologically, wouldn't that mean that other creations created later could have been more powerful? Hmmm..
2. Yea, he's not the DLOTS when he first arrives on Yavin. He becomes DLOTS afterwards. But good try.
3. Prove it cannot be blocked=prove it is unblockable. Maybe someone should teach you the concept of word games. So you say it's blockable, prove it. Ahhhh the rules of debate.
Yeah, back on the thread's topic. Mace crushes Malak. He's much stronger, a much better swordsman (wielding a form that is considered to be the most difficult and the most deadly, that works outrageously well against dark siders, and something that Malak has zero familiarity with), and a more powerful Force user.
Originally posted by Gideon
Yeah, back on the thread's topic. Mace crushes Malak. He's much stronger, a much better swordsman (wielding a form that is considered to be the most difficult and the most deadly, that works outrageously well against dark siders, and something that Malak has zero familiarity with), and a more powerful Force user.
This is obvious, just got into the whole Vaapad nonsense.