Originally posted by Darth Jello
yeah, that's been around since the Talmud. However, that actually has the most liberal judeo-christian perspective on sex, since everything you do is perfectly moral as long as you are in the vagina when you ejaculate, in fact, sex is sinful if the woman doesn't orgasm.
Then a lot of men are sinning and should take better care.
Yep.
In fact, by todays standards - who would get into heaven these days?
You must have no genitalia, be mentally retarded and a vegetarian, prayed every day, and died by saving a school bus of orphans.
Seems like anything resembling human nature is a sin. I'm not allowed to talk to you, I'm performing a sin just by socialising and not getting on with some hard labour - someone get a nun to crack my knuckles with a ruler!
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The man was masturbating in his living room for crying out loud. He was careless, a kid looked into his house and caught him doing something on his property he had a right to be doing. That's ALL it was.-AC
With that I don't agree, it was willful blindness once again. He didn't think of the consequences, he knew that something like that could happen in said area of children yet he was reckless and did it anyway.
That's like saying, I'm gonna shot a gun off in my front lawn, if someone happens to walk by, step on my lawn, and get shot and die, I hold no responsibility because I didn't intend to shoot them, it's their own fault for being there and being nosy 🤨
"That's like saying, I'm gonna shot a gun off in my front lawn, if someone happens to walk by, step on my lawn, and get shot and die, I hold no responsibility because I didn't intend to shoot them, it's their own fault for being there and being nosy What the f**k?"
No, it's nothing like that analogy.
1. The kid can't get physically harmed by seeing someone stroking their junk in their living room.
2. Playing with your weewee and shooting a gun, which is an object made soley for harm, is not comparable in the least (unless the guy is REALLY well hung). The intent of both is completely different.
The kid shouldn't be looking into peoples windows.
Originally posted by silver_tears
With that I don't agree, it was willful blindness once again. He didn't think of the consequences, he knew that something like that could happen in said area of children yet he was reckless and did it anyway.That's like saying, I'm gonna shot a gun off in my front lawn, if someone happens to walk by, step on my lawn, and get shot and die, I hold no responsibility because I didn't intend to shoot them, it's their own fault for being there and being nosy 🤨
That doesn't compare, at all.
Firing off a machine that is intended to kill people is the complete opposite to firing off an organ that is intended to create people.
Originally posted by BackFire
"That's like saying, I'm gonna shot a gun off in my front lawn, if someone happens to walk by, step on my lawn, and get shot and die, I hold no responsibility because I didn't intend to shoot them, it's their own fault for being there and being nosy What the f**k?"No, it's nothing like that analogy.
1. The kid can't get physically harmed by seeing someone stroking their junk in their living room.
2. Playing with your weewee and shooting a gun, which is an object made soley for harm, is not comparable in the least (unless the guy is REALLY well hung). The intent of both is completely different.
The kid shouldn't be looking into peoples windows.
So if the guy was in his front lawn and the kid looked same deal?
Let me guess, the kid shouldn't be looking on someone's property right? 🙄
Originally posted by Red Superfly
That doesn't compare, at all.Firing off a machine that is intended to kill people is the complete opposite to firing off an organ that is intended to create people.
Yea, but you aren't intending to kill someone at that point, what if it was a BB gun? That doesn't kill, or a paintball gun?