If Masturbation Is Wrong, Why Does It Feels So Right?

I wouldnt be suprised ✅

Don't you know you could go blind!!!! 😱

Unless he purposely exposed to the kids, he did nothing wrong besides be careless. Pretty open and shut.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Pretty open and shut.-AC

So, this works just like the blinds? You can leave them open, or you can shut them, right?

I all honesty though AC; before you jump in my shit, you're right. I have been known to jerk off in some pretty random places. Bottom line, anyone could be watching these days.

" If Masturbation Is Wrong, Why Does It Feels So Right?"

I'm reminded of the movie Devil's Advocate. I hated the movie, but I loved the part where Al Pacino says"

"Look, but don't touch. Touch, but don't tast. Taste, but don't swallow."

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
So, this works just like the blinds? You can leave them open, or you can shut them, right?

I all honesty though AC; before you jump in my shit, you're right. I have been known to jerk off in some pretty random places. Bottom line, anyone could be watching these days.

Yeah, I take care in what I do. Sometimes I'm careless, like my reference to outdoor sex. Although that wasn't careless, I just wanted to.

Bottom line, this man was careless and it ended up bad. Blowing it out of proportion by calling the man a child predator and suing him.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Blowing it out of proportion by calling the man a child predator and suing him.-AC

is wrong.

just thought i'd finish your thought.

Yeah I drift in and out.

Gimme a break, I'm listening to Mr. Bungle, these things happen.

🙂.

-AC

He wasn't sued, he was charged by the police, crime against society here, not just the one kid.

This goes down to an understanding of law in my opinion. I personally agree with the decision, but that's because alot of different things are taken into affect from a law point of view.

Originally posted by silver_tears
He wasn't sued, he was charged by the police, crime against society here, not just the one kid.

This goes down to an understanding of law in my opinion. I personally agree with the decision, but that's because alot of different things are taken into affect from a law point of view.

A crime against society? Jerking off in his living room with the curtains open? Bit overdoing it there I think.

-AC

Indecent exposure is a crime against society yes ✅

"A crime against society? Jerking off in his living room with the curtains open? Bit overdoing it there I think."

Yep.

This is just one more thing that can be used to make fun of Canada, someone was arrested for masterbating in their own home.

Haha, that's so wonderful ✅

While a man is sent to prison for life in California because he stole a cookie 👆
Wonder which one is worse there.......

Originally posted by silver_tears
Indecent exposure is a crime against society yes ✅

Jerking off in your living room while leaving the curtains open carelessly but without intent to attract viewers isn't indecent exposure.

Unless of course you inforce law like a nazi.

-AC

Here's the thing, he knew they were open, he knew children walked there, he knew it was daylight, he was by the window, spells intent to me 👆

Here's the thing, he knew they were open, he knew children walked there, he knew it was daylight, he was by the window, spells intent to me

No, spells baseless, invalid assumption.

While a man is sent to prison for life in California because he stole a cookie

Cute, but exagerated to a laughable degree. The three strikes law only has to do with violent or serious crimes, stealing a cookie won't count as their third strike.

Originally posted by silver_tears
Here's the thing, he knew they were open, he knew children walked there, he knew it was daylight, he was by the window, spells intent to me 👆

When I did/do it with girls outside, I KNOW there are people or the possibility of. I know it's daylight (depending), and I know I'm in public.

It doesn't mean I do it with the mentality of "Let's go and let people watch us have sex."

Just like that man didn't purposefully open the curtains with the intent of having kids see him. If he did, then show me proof. Otherwise I'll put it down to carelessness.

-AC

Originally posted by BackFire
No, spells baseless, invalid assumption.

Cute, but exagerated to a laughable degree. The three strikes law only has to do with violent or serious crimes, stealing a cookie won't count as their third strike.

It's to do with "Mens Rea" and such, I'm too tired to argue. But yea, that's intent for you.

It's documented 🤨

No, unless he did it with the purpose of having little kids peer into his house and see him playing ding dong with his monkey, then no, his intent was not to have kids see. As AC says, it's carelessness, nothing more. From all the facts that has been said about this case, and not the assumption, that's all it is, carelessness.

What's documented?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
When I did/do it with girls outside, I KNOW there are people or the possibility of. I know it's daylight (depending), and I know I'm in public.

It doesn't mean I do it with the mentality of "Let's go and let people watch us have sex."

Just like that man didn't purposefully open the curtains with the intent of having kids see him. If he did, then show me proof. Otherwise I'll put it down to carelessness.

-AC

The more valid question, regardless of the curtains or whatnot, is why was he by the window to start with?