Child pornography

Started by Lord Urizen21 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
How is it hiding up Bardocks ass and occasional poking your head out to rant and rave?

😆

He also likes to tell people how to debate 😉

Instead of just attacking your point directly 😉

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You never answered the question. If there is Consent, then how is it wrong ?It's not rape.

1) You finally admitted that a 14 year old CAN give Consent to an adult. So for that I applaud you.

2) Now all I want to know is how is it wrong ? How is it "sick" or "evil" or "twisted" the way you imply that it is ?

Just answer the question, and please...no more bad analogies, no more dancing around the point, no more saying how irresponsible teenagers are these days....

[b]If a 14 year old and an adult have consentual sex, neither of them catch STD's, no one gets pregnant, and they both go on thier merry ways, then WHAT is the problem >??? [/B]

Fruit cake... We have covered this for 20+ pages in total now. I am not going to keep on repeating. Go f#ck a "constenting" 14 year old if you like or be totally against it, I do not care anymore.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
😆

He also likes to tell people how to debate 😉

Instead of just attacking your point directly 😉

see, although great minds can disagree, they can also come together for the common good of trolling and third-person bashing. i love when nutswingers cry "nutswinger". makes me want to have sex with a 12 year old and call everyone paedophile. hypocrisy for the win

Originally posted by PVS
its kinda cramped in here, and its difficult because i have to squeeze to the side to allow the occasional turd to pass through. btw, how is your irrelevant ranting and insulting going? good i hope

Again, you call my debating "irrelevant ranting", yet you have no opinion or ideas of you own on said subject. And you are no one to cry about being insulted, you hypocrite.

Originally posted by PVS
see, although great minds can disagree, they can also come together for the common good of trolling and third-person bashing. i love when nutswingers cry "nutswinger". makes me want to have sex with a 12 year old and call everyone paedophile. hypocrisy for the win

This is funny, you hide behind Bardock and attack me yet now you cry like a baby.

Originally posted by Robtard
This is funny, you hide behind Bardock and attack me yet now you cry like a baby.

is this your new theme? the old 'group think' copout. yet you still refuse to admit your blatant failed logic in dictating what is evolution and what is not, as pure fact, when really you just kinda made it up as you went along, didnt you?

i know i know. "step up." "have balls." whatever dude. wanna see who's prick is bigger? whip it out.

Originally posted by Robtard
Again, you call my debating "irrelevant ranting", yet you have no opinion or ideas of you own on said subject. And you are no one to cry about being insulted, you hypocrite.

there you go again. poor leap in logic. just because i point out childish insults doesnt mean that i felt insulted. i just point out idiocy in a "matter of fact" way, just to give you a hint. btw, do you think you're annoying me? i know im annoying you, with all this pesky logic and deduction as per common debate...but do you think your attempt at emasculation is working? you do, dont you? how cute 😍

Testicles.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Testicles.

what? you got beef? my testicles are so frikin huge a punk like you could live in one of em. HUH??? WHAT??? i thought so *flexes*

Having hollow testicles is a medical condition that ought to be...

a) studied.
b) fixed.
c) exploited.

Originally posted by FeceMan

c) exploited.

im a star im a star im a big bright shining star!!!!!!

On the plus side, Lord Urizen has brought new life to the Religion forum.

On the down side, said 'life' is a Lovecraftian-Frankenstein nightmare of undeath and raw sewage passed off as actual thoughts.

Originally posted by PVS
is this your new theme? the old 'group think' copout. yet you still refuse to admit your blatant failed logic in dictating what is evolution and what is not, as pure fact, when really you just kinda made it up as you went along, didnt you?

i know i know. "step up." "have balls." whatever dude. wanna see who's prick is bigger? whip it out.

My new theme? Pointing out that you call someone elses points flawed yet do not support your own views or opinions? Sure then.

Exactly, grow a pair, if you think pedophilia is wrong then state why as I have, if you think pedophile should be allowed then state why as Bardock and Urizen have. But do not take cheap shots while hiding behind the "I do not know or I will not say" safety wall.

Originally posted by Robtard
My new theme? Pointing out that you call someone elses points flawed yet do not support your own views or opinions? Sure then.

Exactly, grow a pair, if you think pedophilia is wrong then state why as I have, if you think pedophile should be allowed then state why as Bardock and Urizen have. But do not take cheap shots while hiding behind the "I do not know or I will not say" safety wall.

you make no sense at all. and probably have insecurity for undersized genetalia with all your cock and balls references.

Originally posted by PVS
there you go again. poor leap in logic. just because i point out childish insults doesnt mean that i felt insulted. i just point out idiocy in a "matter of fact" way, just to give you a hint. btw, do you think you're annoying me? i know im annoying you, with all this pesky logic and deduction as per common debate...but do you think your attempt at emasculation is working? you do, dont you? how cute 😍

So you will try and make me look bad by saying I use childish insults even though those said insults do not bother you and you do the same exact thing yourself? OK....

Think whatever you like, and in case you didn't realize, saying "grow a penis" was not literal, I meant don't hide your views yet insult others for theirs. It's possible to me masculine and be a coward as you have demonstrated.

Originally posted by PVS
BE A MAN!!!! STEP UP YO!!! BLINDLY DECLARE YOUR SOLID STANCE AND PROVE TO BE AS OBTUSE AS ME!!!!! YOU'RE EITHER WITH ME OR AGAINST ME!!!!

No, nothing like... More like do not attack my ideas and opinion and then refuse to state your ideas and opinions. That's debate, we exchange ideas and opinions. What you did is nothing more than what you chastised someone (forget name) for declaring that pedophilia is wrong and then refusing to give reason, ideas and opinions why.

Originally posted by PVS
you make no sense at all. and probably have insecurity for undersized genetalia with all your cock and balls references.

That must be it...

Originally posted by Robtard
So you will try and make me look bad by saying I use childish insults even though those said insults do not bother you and you do the same exact thing yourself? OK....

if i throw out any unwarranted jabs, feel free to point them out, and i will make an effort to correct myself. if my entire argument consists of nothing but childish jabs, like yours, shoot me dead and call it a mercy killing.

Originally posted by Robtard
Think whatever you like, and in case you didn't realize, saying "grow a penis" was not literal, I meant don't hide your views yet insult others for theirs. It's possible to me masculine and be a coward as you have demonstrated.

still pumping your chest up and flexing nuts? your cute.
but anyway, i already stated that i refuse to DECLARE and ENFORCE an imaginary line when i know for a fact that its imaginary and forever changing. thats because i'm not a frikin idiot.

Originally posted by PVS
if i throw out any unwarranted jabs, feel free to point them out, and i will make an effort to correct myself. if my entire argument consists of nothing but childish jabs, like yours, shoot me dead and call it a mercy killing.

still pumping your chest up and flexing nuts? your cute.
but anyway, i already stated that i refuse to DECLARE and ENFORCE an imaginary line when i know for a fact that its imaginary and forever changing. thats because i'm not a frikin idiot.

Let's see.. I was debating with Bardock and Urizen, you jumped in, supported Bardock yet refused to give your own ideas and opinions why mine were wrong or even support his ideas and opinions. Yea, I am the one that started with the jabs, I did nothing but take cheap shots at Bardock and Urizen for 15+ pages and then I jumped on you like a callous @ss when you came in with your idea-less and opinion-less philosophical quasi-intellectual "What is?" ramblings.

Ok, no reason to debate with you since you are obviously right, yet you haven't giving any opinions and reasons why. 'It' just is I guess...

thats funny, because i began posting in this thread 3 months before you even registered here. just letting you know...since you seem to think i flew in here just to blow bardock and disagree with you. WOW you are so frikin self-important its obnoxious