Child pornography

Originally posted by Robtard
If by saying "so a chick had to have been there first" you mean the chicken came before the egg, I agree.

I you want to believe not allowing children to do whatever they want or certain things is nothing more than repression of freedoms; OK, I cannot convince you further with what I have already said.

I said 13 year olds are not mature enough to experience sex like an adult with an adult. Children and teenagers exploring sex with their peers is natural and a step in the maturing process, I am not against that.

If someone should be allowed to have sex just because their body functions, then I should have been allowed to have sex with adult women when I was 7 (maybe it was 8) by your logic, that's when I started masturbating. Some girls start their menstrual cycles as young as 9, in some cases younger and are technically ready for sex. I do not agree.

I made a mistake there, I meant an egg had to be there first. I mean, where else should the chicken have come from?

But why? they can **** with their peers but not with older people? Why can't they sleep with who they want to sleep with?

Well, I jsut meant the body is mature enough to have sex at that age, now it is a question of consent, and frankly, I believe 13 year olds are able to give their consent.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I made a mistake there, I meant an egg had to be there first. I mean, where else should the chicken have come from?

But why? they can **** with their peers but not with older people? Why can't they sleep with who they want to sleep with?

Well, I jsut meant the body is mature enough to have sex at that age, now it is a question of consent, and frankly, I believe 13 year olds are able to give their consent.

Let's just agree to disagree on the Chicken-Egg thing, OK?

Because ****ing their peers is part of growing up, in fact, people who do not have any sexual contact with their peers during adolescent generally lack social skills when they are older, in essence, they missed out on a step in maturity. But a child or teen does not need to skip that step and experience sex like an adult and with an adult, they have not developed the mental and emotional skills for it yet.

Alright, I know this of you; I disagree that 13 year olds are ready for sex like and adult and with an adult. Like I said, I am certain you could scourer the planet and find me a 13 year old that is and in turn find me a 50 year old that isn't. But generally speaking, it isn't so.

I cannot make you see my point and you cannot make me see yours, we have turned this thread into a copy of the pedohile thread. So let's just disagree and leave it at that.

Originally posted by Robtard
Let's just agree to disagree on the Chicken-Egg thing, OK?

Because ****ing their peers is part of growing up, in fact, people who do not have any sexual contact with their peers during adolescent generally lack social skills when they are older, in essence, they missed out on a step in maturity. But a child or teen does not need to skip that step and experience sex like an adult and with an adult, they have not developed the mental and emotional skills for it yet.

Alright, I know this of you; I disagree that 13 year olds are ready for sex like and adult and with an adult. Like I said, I am certain you could scourer the planet and find me one that is and in turn find me a 50 year old that isn't. But generally speaking, it isn't so.

I cannot make you see my point and you cannot make me see yours, we have turned this thread into a copy of the pedohile thread. So let's just disagree and leave it at that.

For the chicken egg thingy.....no, I wan to know where the chicken came from if not...from a chicken egg.

As for the rest, do you mind if I do not give an in depth reply, since I think we both covered our positions more than enough (for now) and I don't think repeating it for the next 10 pages would entertain me?

Originally posted by Bardock42
For the chicken egg thingy.....no, I wan to know where the chicken came from if not...from a chicken egg.

As for the rest, do you mind if I do not give an in depth reply, since I think we both covered our positions more than enough (for now) and I don't think repeating it for the next 10 pages would entertain me?

OK, if you believe in evolution/natural selection like I think you do. Logically thinking a 'egg' couldn't have just or even slowly evolved out of another living organism. Reasons would dictate that somewhere along a chickens evolutionary line these proto-chickens, for lack of a better word, developed or evolved the ability to reproduce via laying an egg and having the egg serve as an incubation device instead of the female parents womb as it is in mammals. So you are right in thinking a chicken came from an egg, because chickens do come from eggs; but the egg didn't just evolve first.

Agreed, that's why I said lets just agree to disagree. Some advice, take it how you will. But I wouldn't go out in public and state that you think 12 year olds are ready to have sex with adults.

Originally posted by Robtard
OK, if you believe in evolution/natural selection like I think you do. Logically thinking a 'egg' couldn't have just or even slowly evolved out of another living organism. Reasons would dictate that somewhere along a chickens evolutionary line these proto-chickens, for lack of a better word, developed or evolved the ability to reproduce via laying an egg and having the egg serve as an incubation device instead of the female parents womb as it is in mammals. So you are right in thinking a chicken came from an egg, because chickens do come from eggs; but the egg didn't just evolve first.

Agreed, that's why I said lets just agree to disagree. Some advice, take it how you will. But I wouldn't go out in public and state that you think 12 year olds are ready to have sex with adults.

Yeah, but I think the thing that laid the first "chicken egg", was maybe close to a chicken but not yet a chicken. So the egg was their first, since the first chicken had to come out of the egg.

Haha, thank you, but I enjoy to be true to what I believe is right.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, but I think the thing that laid the first "chicken egg", was maybe close to a chicken but not yet a chicken. So the egg was their first, since the first chicken had to come out of the egg.

Haha, thank you, but I enjoy to be true to what I believe is right.

I think evolution works far slower than that, especially with a complex organism like a chicken. Possible the chicken as we know it developed in sync with the egg as we know it. I'm sure far smarter people with far greater education and study into the subject have better and more sensible answers. It's questions like this that make some people just say, "What? I don't get it, therefore God must have 'poof'd' the chicken into existence."

Originally posted by Robtard
I think evolution works far slower than that, especially with a complex organism like a chicken. Possible the chicken as we know it developed in sync with the egg as we know it. I'm sure far smarter people with far greater education and study into the subject have better and more sensible answers. It's questions like this that make some people just say, "What? I don't get it, therefore God must have 'poof'd' the chicken into existence."

Yeah, of course Evolution works much slower than that, but I think it is of no matter to the subject...if we take evolution as being accurate and from what we know f chicken it seems to be the answer that the first chicken must have come from a chicken egg...

Moving on...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, of course Evolution works much slower than that, but I think it is of no matter to the subject...if we take evolution as being accurate and from what we know f chicken it seems to be the answer that the first chicken must have come from a chicken egg...

Then the question would be, how different from a chicken was the creature that first laided the chicken egg. Considering the snails pace that evolution is, I would say that the difference would be minuscule and very hard to differentiate between the chickens we eat today and that proto-chicken of long ago.

Originally posted by Robtard
Then the question would be, how different from a chicken was the creature that first laided the chicken egg. Considering the snails pace that evolution is, I would say that the difference would be minuscule and very hard to differentiate between the chickens we eat today and that proto-chicken of long ago.

Yeah, probably really, really small, but the first thing that we would consider a chicken nowadays had to have come from a chicken egg...I'm not saying that eggs came before any kind of animal, just before the chicken, since to be a chicken you have to be born from a chicken egg.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Moving on...

Don't be scared away by the mystery of the Chicken-Egg conundrum.

Originally posted by Robtard
Let's just agree to disagree on the Chicken-Egg thing, OK?

Because ****ing their peers is part of growing up, in fact, people who do not have any sexual contact with their peers during adolescent generally lack social skills when they are older, in essence, they missed out on a step in maturity. But a child or teen does not need to skip that step and experience sex like an adult and with an adult, they have not developed the mental and emotional skills for it yet.

Tell me what is the difference between having sex with another 14 year old and having sex with an adult.

Originally posted by Robtard
Alright, I know this of you; I disagree that 13 year olds are ready for sex like and adult and with an adult. Like I said, I am certain you could scourer the planet and find me a 13 year old that is and in turn find me a 50 year old that isn't. But generally speaking, it isn't so.

How can a 13 year old be ready for sex with another 13 year old, but now with an adult ? You're either ready to have sex, or you're not.

Originally posted by Robtard
I cannot make you see my point and you cannot make me see yours, we have turned this thread into a copy of the pedohile thread. So let's just disagree and leave it at that.

Give up already ? 🙁

Jesus Chriiiist

is it me or is this topic getting odder and more unerving then before

Originally posted by Maple Sugar
is it me or is this topic getting odder and more unerving then before

It's you and the conditioning you have been exposed to.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Jesus Chriiiist

Know him. What about him?

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Jesus Chriiiist

He's my Savior 🙂

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Tell me what is the difference between having sex with another 14 year old and having sex with an adult.

How can a 13 year old be ready for sex with another 13 year old, but now with an adult ? You're either ready to have sex, or you're not.

Give up already ? 🙁

Well, lets see... 1) Maturity 2) Physical aspects 3) mental aspect 4) emotional aspect. Are you telling me that at 14 you were ready to face life like and adult? And stop with your magical number 14, you only say 14 and not 13, 12 or whatever because that is when you were willingly molested by a 24 year old. If you had been 11 at the time, you'd be saying 'Tell me what is the difference between having sex with another 11 year old and having sex with an adult .'

Because both 13 year olds are are comparable in mental, emotional and maturity levels. Exploring sex with your peers is part of growing up.

Give up? I might as well try to rationalize with the Grand F#cking Wizard of the KKK circa 1950 that African Americans really aren't a lower race of people than convince yourself, Bardock or PVS who jumped on my views without backing or taking a stance on his, go figure with that logic. Besides, we are all sounding like parrots, so what is the point in continuing, let's just agree to disagree.

Originally posted by Cosmic_Beings
I was just surfing the web for porn, and I accidentally came upon a site full of child pornography. Should I report it to the fbi?

i love how you just admit to surfin porn

Originally posted by Robtard
Well, lets see... 1) Maturity 2) Physical aspects 3) mental aspect 4) emotional aspect. Are you telling me that at 14 you were ready to face life like and adult?

Life ? No..

Sex? Yeah....

So I assume you beleive that all 14 year olds have the same maturity level, have the same physical/mental/emotional aspects ?

Originally posted by Robtard
And stop with your magical number 14, you only say 14 and not 13, 12 or whatever because that is when you were willingly molested by a 24 year old.

Molestation is fun then....I don't see the harm in it. Nothing bad came about it. ❌

Originally posted by Robtard
If you had been 11 at the time, you'd be saying 'Tell me what is the difference between having sex with another 11 year old and having sex with an adult .'

WRONG I was 15 when I had sex with a 24 year old...

Originally posted by Robtard
Because both 13 year olds are are comparable in mental, emotional and maturity levels. Exploring sex with your peers is part of growing up.

How do you know both 13 year olds are comparable ? All 13 year olds are the same ?

Exploring sex with your peers is part of growing up, but having sex with an adult is somehow evil..... 🤨

What's the real difference? You never addressed that..yeah you keep telling me the obvious differences, but you don't explain how its "wrong" when there's mutual Consent involved.

Originally posted by Robtard
Give up? I might as well try to rationalize with the Grand F#cking Wizard of the KKK circa 1950 that African Americans really aren't a lower race of people than convince yourself, Bardock or PVS who jumped on my views without backing or taking a stance on his, go figure with that logic. Besides, we are all sounding like parrots, so what is the point in continuing, let's just agree to disagree.

I'll let it go when you explain to me why its wrong for an adult and 14 yaer old to have sex. All you keep doing is making poor irrelevant analogies, giving me a bunch of Conservative like bias, and telling me how different a teenager and adult is...

So what....what does the difference matter ?

Can you please just get to the point ? Why is it wrong ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Life ? No..

Sex? Yeah....

So I assume you beleive that all 14 year olds have the same maturity level, have the same physical/mental/emotional aspects ?

Molestation is fun then....I don't see the harm in it. Nothing bad came about it. ❌

[b]WRONG I was 15 when I had sex with a 24 year old...

How do you know both 13 year olds are comparable ? All 13 year olds are the same ?

Exploring sex with your peers is part of growing up, but having sex with an adult is somehow evil..... 🤨

What's the real difference? You never addressed that..yeah you keep telling me the obvious differences, but you don't explain how its "wrong" when there's mutual Consent involved.

I'll let it go when you explain to me why its wrong for an adult and 14 year old to have sex. All you keep doing is making poor irrelevant analogies, giving me a bunch of Conservative like bias, and telling me how different a teenager and adult is...

So what....what does the difference matter ?

Can you please just get to the point ? Why is it wrong ? [/B]

Sex is a large part of life, without sex we all wouldn't be here.

You said 14, if you're saying 15 now, then whatever. You lied, you made an error, I made an error; either way I do not care.

No, I not say everyone is exactly alike, as I told Bardock, I am sure you could find me a 13 year old that is mentally and emotionally better equipped than a 50 year old, but that isn't the norm.

Yes, exploring sex with your peers and having sex with like individuals is part of the maturity process. Having sex like and adult and with an adult isn't.

I have explained and given examples repeatedly, I no longer wish to repeat them over and over.

Let it go or don't let it go, doesn't matter to me, we will just not see eye to eye... It seems to me that anything you disagree with is labeled "Conservative"; go ahead, think I am Rush Limbaugh.

The difference is what matters Nabokov, the difference exist.

And I have repeatedly...