well lol i am speaking in hypothetics here, but the real issue is education. I was in my high school journalism class and i had to do research on sex for one of our issues and one of the things I found was that a teenage boy, if he was close to his mother, had a much higher possiblity of prolonging intercourse than a person who wasnt close with their mother...
in other words if a guy was close to his mother, he might not loss his virginity until the age of 19 instead of 16 or even quite possibly retain his virginity till marriage. It all has to do with communication in a household and education.
I really believe that everything stems from the family. If a family communicates well, then theres a higher chance that things could come out great for the kids.
Originally posted by Morbid4Daniel
Yeah..I agree. I mean comparing your's and a1's opinions, I wouldnt exactly disown..I mean Id probably go through a 6 week depression and raging mad fit but I may get through it. Its just the fact that Ill have another child to take care of, support, etc.
Alrighty, and yes, a1h's post actually makes sense, and I agree with it....mostly.
But, I was a Moma's boy, and I didn't retain my virginity....
at the age of 12, 13, 14 and 15 the girl isn't fully developed so the girl is causing more harm to her and it makes the girl have a bad reputation and it sets a bad image about her... so in essence she's actually does more bad to herself than good...Then she crys complains and whines about people calling her whore, tramp, hoe, and other bad names...Children or younger teenagers now days think it's kool to have sex at a young age without any knowledge onto what physical dieseases there are and that it may be hazardous to there health at such a young age....and parents need to be more invovled with their children and put them in programs to where the parent can be involve like martial arts that way the parent or parents know where the child is and what the child is doing.....Overall i think that children having sex at a young age isn't needed and children or teenagers need to be more supervised more carefully.....
😕
Yes....and I agree.
What I'm saying is, we can try, but kids don't listen nowadays, (I sure as hell didn't back in '90, and I almost got a girl pregnant), and I seriously think that if we are to try to change the fact of young kids having sex before they are either fully developed or of legal age, we would have to change the way society thinks as a whole.
unfortunately sex at that age is wrong in today's society... but then as humans we have to change our biological need to procreate at that age and it's hard to go against millions of years of evolution to perpetuate the group in order to survive in a once hostile world...still is in some ways
after all...we are still animals no matter the debate
only now we don't have large carnivorous predatory animals with extremely large teeth chasing down the young, old and sick... hence our need for sex once a girl becomes a woman: her menstrual cycle begins...
it's all in the past yes... yet in some societies there are girls literally married off at 13 to 15 years...
where's it's wrong in our morally conscious, religiously induced country, in others it's not... that's not to say it's all right
education can only do so much... if you want change, then rise up and speak up against all the media frenzy and sex saturated industry we come to know so well
other wise...let the party begin 😛
okay...i'm only joking on that part - sheesh 🙄