the proof stands logan will heal from having his head cut off. also by the way beast is the leading expert on mutantions. he also demenstarted what logans healing factor was able to due.. what he showed was that logan is able to heal from a drop of blood. yes it true im not makning it up thats what THE LEADING EXPERT OF MUTANTS SAID and showed
You do realise no matter how many times you post that he can be decapitated and heal, it doesn't transmute unsupported logical fallacy into truth?
There are several experts on mutant genetics, Mr. Sinister, the late Moira MacTaggert, Charles Xavier, Dr. Kavita Rao from Astonishing and Beast, among them. How do you derive that Beast is the leading expert on mutants, when a) Xavier, MacTaggert and MacTaggert began their work a decade or more before Beast, and in the case of Sinister over a century before; and b) I recall it being stated that Xavier is the foremost authority on mutation and mutants.
you can't make hearsay into proof. ask anybody who's heard of logic.
logan can heal from a single drop of blood? beast determined that? beast, an expert scientist in biology and genetics said, on panel, that logan's genetics are strong enough that a drop of blood could completely recreate the varied tissues, systems and electrical functions of a living body? beast said this? got an issue or a scan? got anything besides something you read on the internet, conveniently putting beast's opinion in where it doesn't exist, and leaving out the fact that his entire body was regenerated by some strange alien technology/crystal/somethin'-or-other? got anything besides (paola forgive me) obsessive fanboyism screwing with your thought processes?
When he healed from a single drop of blood there was a major plot device involved, the drop of blood landed on a crystal that superenergized that cell enabling it to regenerate himself. It was the crystal that reenergized him, not under his own power though otherwise we really WOULD have an infinite number of wolverine's running around due to the exponential rate at which they would multiply. Each time he is cut and the blood seperates would be a new wolverine.
And as for the aids thing, Wolverine probably would not get aids in the first place as I feel his Healing factor could get through the protein shell of the HIV virus.
( x-men unlimited) jean grey says I quote "he was DEAD, scott. his vital sighns were nonexistent...He was CLINICALLY and MEDICALLY dead.." yes she is talken about wolverine. also ( x-men liberfitors #2) wolverine dies from a death factor the doctor state that he is dead and then throw him in the snow. he comes back from it.
Originally posted by wolverine8888I thought he horribly slaughtered that word. . .
(x-men liberfitors #2)
http://cgi.benl.ebay.be/Marvel-Comic-X-Men-Liberfitors-2_W0QQitemZ6572594554QQcategoryZ17085QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting
Turns out there is an x-men liberfitors #2. . .
Though I would like to know what the hell a liberfitor is. . .
Is it german for liberators?
Wolverine sucks... end of.
They put Wolvy in every book/ guest star. They increase sales they say... when only a frigging infant would be so dumb as to buy them just because Wolverine is on the cover.... Marvel then have said their comics aren't aimed for kids, but "some" are appropirate for kids' age.... SO really all Marvel are doing is putting Wolverine on the cover or writing him in the book to sell them to kids.... when Writers specifically say "I don't write for the fans" "I write for myself" (and to both statements I say "**** YOU {insert writer's name}"😉
its obvious that writers are being pressured by Mr. EIC to include wolvey or even Spiderman for that matter purely because he only cares about the money. Not about the fans benefit/enjoyment... he just uses the fans to make the money. MARVEL have lost their way.