Originally posted by Ushgarak
No, the Doctor scolded them for killing ones that were developing as independent life forms. The Amy ganger was not that; it was just a remote-controlled shell.
Except the gangers before the lighting strike were only remote controlled shells as well. He scolded them before the lightening strike that made them "alive".
Originally posted by -K-M-
Except the gangers before the lighting strike were only remote controlled shells as well. He scolded them before the lightening strike that made them "alive".
No, the criticism was for not acknowledging that the flesh was alive and the consequences that came from that- like the pile of 'decommissioned' bodies that were left immobile but still sentient. The gangers were not sentient when they were being controlled; the problem was that the imprint was left behind afterwards.
Else the Doctor could have just killed 'Amy' ages ago. The whole point is that he had come to find a way to block the signal.
Originally posted by Ushgarak
No, the criticism was for not acknowledging that the flesh was alive and the consequences that came from that- like the pile of 'decommissioned' bodies that were left immobile but still sentient. The gangers were not sentient when they were being controlled; the problem was that the imprint was left behind afterwards.Else the Doctor could have just killed 'Amy' ages ago. The whole point is that he had come to find a way to block the signal.
Yeah, he said the flesh was alive that's my point. Amy was created from the flesh.
Also he didnt know about the decommisioned bodies till much later, and amy flesh would still have an imprint as well. Seems sketchy.
and as I said earlier as well, the gangers were the exact same way at the castle and Doctor said the flesh was alive even before the lightening blast giving them independent thought. Only one who cared about the ganger before they became sentient was the doctor, but then he did that. Doesn't seem right.
but lets leave it at that, as were going in circles.