Originally posted by PVS
the exact point i bring up over and over.
not to mention everyone's failure to answer my question:
what did the baby do to deserve being shocked with 50000 volts?
"its the mother's fault" they say...but when did she point the taser at herself and pull the trigger? never.
the mother chose to shock her baby when she resisted arrest.
Originally posted by Lana
Anyone could be carrying a concealed weapon....
True..but I seriously doubt the cop thought she was carrying a concealed weapon..or else he would have pulled out his..and well..that would have been the end of the story. The whole scenario just reeks of "Macho Cop" BS...meaning the police think they can essentially do whatever they want because..well..they're the police...
Originally posted by Napalm
What not funny bout a pregnat lady geting tasered
are you bu1shitting me??? are you seriously like f(_)cking retarded or something???
you need to grow the f(_)ck up. seriously.
oh yeah and by the way, there is absolutely NOTHING funny about a pregnant woman being tazered. EVER.
I wonder if YOUR mother was tazered while she was pregnant with YOU. at least brain damage would be a valid explanation for your posts.
Originally posted by Curl_Up&Dye
are you bu1shitting me??? are you seriously like f(_)cking retarded or something???you need to grow the f(_)ck up. seriously.
oh yeah and by the way, there is absolutely NOTHING funny about a pregnant woman being tazered. EVER.
I wonder if YOUR mother was tazered while she was pregnant with YOU. at least brain damage would be a valid explanation for your posts.
Originally posted by FeceMan
That's exactly the reaction that he wanted. Good job for positively reinforcing him.
well excuse me for being pissed off at the fact that he thinks the whole thing is funny.
I guess i'll keep my rage to myself the next time someone crosses the line with me.
but i'll keep my opinions to myself next time if you promise to do the same.
smartass
Keep your PMS in check.
Feceman was simply pointed out that Napalm said what he said in order to get attention of some kind, by you getting pissy at him over his post, you gave him what he wanted, as such, he'll continue to say shit like that merely for shock value in hopes of continuing to get humerous reactions from people who are upset over what he said.
Originally posted by BackFire
Keep your PMS in check.Feceman was simply pointed out that Napalm said what he said in order to get attention of some kind, by you getting pissy at him over his post, you gave him what he wanted, as such, he'll continue to say shit like that merely for shock value in hopes of continuing to get humerous reactions from people who are upset over what he said.
which begs 2 questions
1-wouldnt that classify him as a 'troll'?
2-if so, why is this allowed?
Originally posted by BackFire
Why? It's his opinion, what do you care?
i thought we established before that he was just saying it to get a reaction.
and what i said to him in my original post is MY opinion. So if youre going to go that route, then no one should complain that my opinion in reply to his is encouraging him.
Difference is, in your post you were insulting towards him, calling him retarded and what not for posting his opinion on something that had no direct corrilation to you, he never insulted anyone, you did.
He was saying it to get a reaction, and he has a right to do so as long as his post isn't breaking any rules, you, on the other hand, don't have the right to put someone down for posting an opinion that you don't like.
Originally posted by BackFire
Difference is, in your post you were insulting towards him, calling him retarded and what not for posting his opinion on something that had no direct corrilation to you, he never insulted anyone, you did.He was saying it to get a reaction, and he has a right to do so as long as his post isn't breaking any rules, you, on the other hand, don't have the right to put someone down for posting an opinion that you don't like.
First of all....you dont know whether or not it has a direct correlation to me. for all you know, I could be pregnant, or know someone who was affected by violence towards a pregnant woman. So dont assume that what he said has nothing to do with me.
Second of all, obviously if he is posting complete crap to get a reaction, then he is doing it purposely to offend people, which is against the forum rules to begin with.
I have a right to express my opinion as well. Which in my opinion he is a complete ass for posting what he did. And if he's going around posting that he thinks its funny when pregnant women get tazered, then I doubt that 'retarded' is the worst thing he's been called.
First of all....you dont know whether or not it has a direct correlation to me. for all you know, I could be pregnant, or know someone who was affected by violence towards a pregnant woman. So dont assume that what he said has nothing to do with me.
Irrelevant, he didn't make his comment with you in mind, and he didn't intentionally aim his comment at you in particular, nor did he insult you personally. Just because you MAY be pregnant doesn't mean he had you in mind when making a comment about a newstory.
Second of all, obviously if he is posting complete crap to get a reaction, then he is doing it purposely to offend people, which is against the forum rules to begin with.
You are wrong, posting something that may be taken as offensive by some people is NOT against the rules, unless it's sole purpose is to be offensive to everyone by using foul language or insults. Now, if he had posted something with an insult to another member (like you did) that IS against the rules. He didn't, he made a statement pertaining to the topic, which may or may not have had teh intention of offending, just because he wanted to get a reaction doens't mean he doesn't believe what he said, nor does it mean he wanted to offend people. Doing something for a reaction and purposely offending people is not the same thing.
I have a right to express my opinion as well. Which in my opinion he is a complete ass for posting what he did. And if he's going around posting that he thinks its funny when pregnant women get tazered, then I doubt that 'retarded' is the worst thing he's been called.
Not if your opinion involves name calling and insults because he made a vague comment that you didn't like. THAT is against the rules, my dear. Find a way to express yourself without insulting someone.
Vague, smartass comments aimed at poking fun at a topic is not against the rules.