Originally posted by Alpha Centauriwhoever said that every single person who has every used Marijuana is going to suffer or die. Nobody.
Didn't say that did I? I said that there are people in this world and throughout history who have over-indulged pot to severe degrees and not died. The same cannot be said for cigarettes wholly.-AC
Everybody who has ever been choked hasn't died.
Everybody who has ever been mauled by a dog hasn't been killed.
Everybody who has ever been shot hasn't died.
Everybdoy who has ever been present during one of your "i'm right and everybody else is wrong" "discussions" hasn't went and gouged their eyeballs out as to free themselves of this torment.
Now, if we go by your statement, then people all over the world would be, for example, carrying around guns and we'd probably not even have gun control b/c "everybody who has ever been shot hasn't died" and therefore being shot is not dangerous.
Just b/c everybody hasn't been negatively affected by this DRUG doesn't mean that it isn't harmful.
IS IT COMPREHENSIBLE.....
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
whoever said that every single person who has every used Marijuana is going to suffer or die. Nobody.Everybody who has ever been choked hasn't died.
Everybody who has ever been mauled by a dog hasn't been killed.
Everybody who has ever been shot hasn't died.
Everybdoy who has ever been present during one of your "i'm right and everybody else is wrong" "discussions" hasn't went and gouged their eyeballs out as to free themselves of this torment.
Haha, yeah. Bring on the relevance...
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
Now, if we go by your statement, then people all over the world would be, for example, carrying around guns and we'd probably not even have gun control b/c "everybody who has ever been shot hasn't died" and therefore being shot is not dangerous.
Hmm, nnnno. Nope. Definitely NOT going by anything remotely close to being near what I said, at all.
However, to use that incredibly faulty statement: If you get shot and you don't die, it's still pretty bad and that's obvious. If you walk into a hospital with a gunshot would in the arm, you won't die but it's still quite obvious that getting shot is bad, isn't it? If someone smokes pot, eats pot or drinks it post-straining, there's no way to say "Oh my god! Pot is DANGEROUS AND BAD FOR YOU!" Because it's not. You are uneducated on the subject and that analogy is just pointless and stupid.
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
Just b/c everybody hasn't been negatively affected by this DRUG doesn't mean that it isn't harmful.IS IT COMPREHENSIBLE.....
No, it's not harmful because...well...it isn't harmful, that's why. Yes, it's that simple.
So answer my question, the one you keep dodging:
You said it's bad to do in ANY context (excessively or otherwise), why? "It's bad for you." No it's not, fact, established fact. So, one can only assume that it's legality, right?
I suggest either way, you educate yourself on the subject.
-AC
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
whoever said that every single person who has every used Marijuana is going to suffer or die. Nobody.1Everybody who has ever been choked hasn't died.
2Everybody who has ever been mauled by a dog hasn't been killed.
3Everybody who has ever been shot hasn't died.
4Everybdoy who has ever been present during one of your "i'm right and everybody else is wrong" "discussions" hasn't went and gouged their eyeballs out as to free themselves of this torment.Now, if we go by your statement, then people all over the world would be, for example, carrying around guns and we'd probably not even have gun control b/c "everybody who has ever been shot hasn't died" and therefore being shot is not dangerous.
Just b/c everybody hasn't been negatively affected by this DRUG doesn't mean that it isn't harmful.
IS IT COMPREHENSIBLE.....
I don't think I've ever seen a gun pick itself up and shoot someone. Usually, there is a person behind the action. And, again, the pot isn't smoking itself. Someone is smoking it. And if you want to debate possible health problems, then what about the hundreds of other things out there that people abuse that cause harm to themselves? Should cigarettes also be banned? Should alcohol? Thaty isn't the jo of teh government.
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
I'm just stating that it's harmful.
It's not though, you just refuse to believe that. You are just assuming that because it's an illegal drug, it's harmful.
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
get it got it good.is it comprehensible.....
Actually it's "Got it? Get it. Good." but you should heed those words anyway.
-AC
Yeah, but if you say that there are gun laws governing the buying and selling of guns as a measure of protecting people from themselves, then it's a reasonable assumption to assume you are saying the same about pot.
I'm only talking about pot too.
Now, if you think that pot should be banned because exsesive use is a health risk to the person smoking it, then I'm saying that isn't the responsability of a government or even a well meaning individual. If pot were a commonly used ingredient in foods and was dangerous in that form, or a threat to the environment, then that would be different.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Yeah, but if you say that there are gun laws governing the buying and selling of guns as a measure of protecting people from themselves, then it's a reasonable assumption to assume you are saying the same about pot.I'm only talking about pot too.
Now, if you think that pot should be banned because exsesive use is a health risk to the person smoking it, then I'm saying that isn't the responsability of a government or even a well meaning individual. If pot were a commonly used ingredient in foods and was dangerous in that form, or a threat to the environment, then that would be different.
Originally posted by Alpha CentauriActually it's "Got it? Get it. Good." but you should heed those words anyway.
-AC
I had it right the first time. I meant exactly what I said.
is it comprehensible.....
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
who said anything about banning. I didn't.I'm just stating that it's harmful.
And I don't really care about the other stuff you said, b/c right now I'm solely talking about Marijuana.
get it got it good.
is it comprehensible.....
❌ Ay Guey!!!
TO ALL YOU PINCHE PENDEJOS WHO THINK WEED IS HARMFUL: WEED IS ONLY, ONLY, ONLY DEADLY IF YOU PUT YOURSELF IN A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS SITUATION WHILE FADED. 😠
Here's a good example: You're a personal pilot, its one of your hobbies. One day you and some friends are flying over the countryside in your nice little Cessna, and you vatos decide to hotbox the cockpit. Well......chances are you'll probably crash, and you'll deserve it for being a complete dumbass.
Getting faded under MOST CIRCUMSTANCES in the safety of your own home is prefectly fine and very fun.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
❌ Ay Guey!!!TO ALL YOU PINCHE PENDEJOS WHO THINK WEED IS HARMFUL: WEED IS [B]ONLY, ONLY, ONLY
DEADLY IF YOU PUT YOURSELF IN A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS SITUATION WHILE FADED. 😠Here's a good example: You're a personal pilot, its one of your hobbies. One day you and some friends are flying over the countryside in your nice little Cessna, and you vatos decide to hotbox the cockpit. Well......chances are you'll probably crash, and you'll deserve it for being a complete dumbass.
Getting faded under MOST CIRCUMSTANCES in the safety of your own home is prefectly fine and very fun. [/B]
Me and you come from a whole different, b/c the way I see it, way less than that is needed to show how harmful Marijuana is.
Here's another comment by ME in this "heated" "debate". For the one who cared enough to PM me and threaten to report me for stating my own opinions that doesn't agree with theirs. (you know who you are).
is it comprehensible.....
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
Me and you come from a whole different, b/c the way I see it, way less than that is needed to show how harmful Marijuana is.Here's another comment by ME in this "heated" "debate". For the one who cared enough to PM me and threaten to report me for stating my own opinions that doesn't agree with theirs. (you know who you are).
is it comprehensible.....
I PMed you and told you to cut out butting in every other debate I have, waving the pom poms. I'm quite happy to have you in this one because it's funny.
You are missing the point, pot isn't harmful. You believe it is with zero reason to, zero amount of explaination, nothing. You're just saying "It's bad for you." "Why?" "Bad for you." "Why?". Then, when established that it's not, you decide to go all over the place whining and dodging.
I shall ask you again, your quote:
"It's bad to do."
My question: Why? If we've established, regardless of your idiocy, that it's harmless, then why is it bad to do?
-AC
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
AC you believe that pot is completely harmless??? say I smoke 3 smokes a day for 10 years it will have no effects on my health??? (Would you concider thats what the average smoker would smoke?)
As Capt said, pot doesn't smoke itself. The SMOKING is what does the damage. Eat pot in a cake, three times a day for ten years and the only harm you'll come to is being fat, just like any food. The drug itself? No.
If pot were legal and we grew up in a world where it was legal, these debates would never exist. Only because it's illegal are there debates about "harm".
If music was made illegal tomorrow, I doubt anyone would stop listening to it just because it was illegal. Illegal doesn't mean "wrong" or "bad". It means the government are deterring you from doing something. In this case; Growing a drug that they could make zero money off.
Making nature illegal: One of life's mysteries.
-AC
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I've read that recent studies have shown that Pot could cause psychosis, schizophrenia, or clinical depression.
What do you make of that??? More junk science???
I make this out of it: You read studies and took them to be true, apparantly.
Pot causes an altered state, people react differently to this said state. Therefore the third factor is the difference in people, not the drug.
-AC