Thing vs Hulk

Originally posted by Jonathanos
They are not even in strength. When they were trapped deep underground and the Hulk and Thing were holding up the cave-in, Thing looked to be straining for all he was worth while Hulk had a smile on his face.

What's the term? Backpedaling? 💃

Originally posted by snoopdogg
😆 Boy you sure are a entertaining person. You should look both ways before crossing the street son.

What's the term? Backpedaling? 💃

Show me where I'm backpedalling.

Originally posted by Jonathanos
Show me where I'm backpedalling.

Originally posted by S.G
Um didn't Hulk come before Grundy 🙄

Um.... actually, no. Solomon Grundy premiered in 1944 as one of Alan Scott's villains. Hulk premiered in 1962. So yeah, Hulk is a Grundy ripoff. 😬

Originally posted by batdude123
Um.... actually, no. Solomon Grundy premiered in 1944 as one of Alan Scott's villains. Hulk premiered in 1962. So yeah, Hulk is a Grundy ripoff. 😬

Originally posted by batdude123
Um.... actually, no. Solomon Grundy premiered in 1944 as one of Alan Scott's villains. Hulk premiered in 1962. So yeah, Hulk is a Grundy ripoff. 😬

Ugh, im not going to waste my time arguing with a hulk fanboy. It isnt worth it

Everybody knows that Grundy came first. Although I do believe it has more to do with coincidence than consciously ripping him off.

Originally posted by Grimm22
Ugh, im not going to waste my time arguing with a hulk fanboy. It isnt worth it

Originally posted by Ricodrayz
Omg, because thing can't win the majority we are Hulk fanboys fear

First, im not talking to you.

Second, Prof. Hulk is very overrated ✅

Originally posted by snoopdogg
If I actually give a sh!t I would. But you know what I am talking about. Let's just leave it at that.

Originally posted by batdude123
Um.... actually, no. Solomon Grundy premiered in 1944 as one of Alan Scott's villains. Hulk premiered in 1962. So yeah, Hulk is a Grundy ripoff. 😬

Originally posted by Grimm22
First, im not talking to you.

Second, Prof. Hulk is very overrated ✅

Originally posted by Accel
It's not really overrating him to say he beats Thing.

once again im talking to that fanboy I was arguing with before.

Still though there is no evidince to say that Current Ben would lose to Prof. Hulk

Originally posted by Grimm22
once again im talking to that fanboy I was arguing with before.

Originally posted by Grimm22
Still though there is no evidince to say that Current Ben would lose to Prof. Hulk

Originally posted by Accel
Jon? He seems to be pretty well informed. It's not like he's made any thing up.

I would say just about every one of their confrontations is a good indication, like this one...

Originally posted by Accel
Jon? He seems to be pretty well informed. It's not like he's made any thing up.

I would say just about every one of their confrontations is a good indication, like this one...

Current Ben is stronger than he was then 😐

Second, thats a crap showing, Ben NEVER gives up.

Hulk wins Thing does not even survive this attack.

Originally posted by snoopdogg
If I actually give a sh!t I would. But you know what I am talking about. Let's just leave it at that.

Now THAT was backpedalling. 😆

Originally posted by Grimm22
Ugh, im not going to waste my time arguing with a hulk fanboy. It isnt worth it

Translation:

You cannot prove that Thing is stronger than his spiky version.

You cannot prove that Thing is more durable than Hulk.

You cannot prove that the Hulk survives nukes because he absorbs them.

You pretty much cannot support anything you're claiming so you adopt a superior attitude, call the opposition fanboys, and hope it covers your tracks.

It doesn't.