General Kaliero
F = ma, beeyotches.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
True, but some people just tend to give the exclusive point so much meaning as if multiplatforms don't even exist. It's like "hey, your platform doesn't have game X, ergo it sucks so much lolz."
Well the main reason for that, I think, is that multiplatform games are pretty much always developed for 360 first and then ported to the PS3, and comparisons have shown time and time again that graphical differences between the systems on those games are negligible to the point of being almost nonexistent. So for someone who thinks that graphics are the only determinant of game quality, they have to rely on their consoles exclusives to show apparent "superiority."
Originally posted by quanchi112
It is more successful overall but I enjoy the ps3. More powerful and I favor those exclusives by far. I do like the fable series though. Like I said though even with ports like castle why need two discs when the ps3 does it on one. I don't like fps games but they do well due to them being team type things and not solo quests.
Why is having multiple discs a bad thing? It doesn't increase the cost of the game for the buyer, it makes players feel like they received more game for their buck, and if the game is done well switching the disc happens right after a dramatic story event. Tales of Symphonia on the Gamecube, Lost Odyssey, and sometimes even the PS1 era FFs used dramatic disc swaps to great effect.